[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Solaris-10-SPARC

2009-04-10 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Solaris-10-SPARC on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Solaris-10-SPARC/builds/1440 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: solaris-10-sparc Build

Re: [Wireshark-dev] UAT access from within the registration functions

2009-04-10 Thread Abhik Sarkar
Thank you, thank you, thank you, Luis! It never occurred to me that I could load it manually. This worked! Also, it turns out that my original approach did not work because UAT preferences is one of the only preference types which, if changed, doesn't lead to the calling of the apply_cb passed in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] UAT access from within the registration functions

2009-04-10 Thread Luis EG Ontanon
You welcome, I made uat_load() idempotent to do exactly what you needed, It is used in oids.c to set the path and list the MIBS to be loaded, as such I needed it to be loaded at protocol registration and no later. To avoid it being loaded twice uat_load marks the uat as loaded. \Lego On Fri,

[Wireshark-dev] Scripting / writing a macro for wireshark

2009-04-10 Thread Samuel Cheung
Hi, I currently have a separate logger which logs WLAN packets at the same time as wireshark. I have been able to correlate the two logs so that one packet in the other log will correspond to one packet in the wireshark log. I am currently attempting to script my program so that selecting a

[Wireshark-dev] Re : Re : Modifying the ETH dissector

2009-04-10 Thread yvanmmailbox-web
Actually, I did what you explained me, and I obtained...what I wanted! Indeed, Ethernet information is available in the pinfo structure, but I don't have Ethernet tree, even it is called (I can see in frame.protocols I have eth:afdx:ip:udp);it is replaced by my own tree. My problem in this case

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTCP Frame length check: Wrong

2009-04-10 Thread Guy Harris
(This is actually a wireshark-users question, not a wireshark-dev question; I'm redirecting this to wireshark-users.) On Apr 9, 2009, at 3:09 AM, shivani matta wrote: one option is to type RTCP in filter and it will show the packet. No, it doesn't - not in my version of Wireshark, not even

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2009-04-10 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/5978 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build