Christopher Painter wrote:
Either way, I disagree with your `well supported story` theory as
there is nothing in MSI or the SDK that discusses this story.
That's like saying C doesn't support linked lists because the ISO
standard doesn't document them.
--
sig://boB
http://joyofsetup.com/
Christopher Painter wrote:
I'm afraid you lost me there. Just about everything inside the MSI
engine can be one outside of MSI.
We were discussing simple property persistence. MSI has an equally
simple declarative pattern: Write it to the registry during
installation, read it back via
I don't agree that installation and configuration are automatically distinct
nor do I agree that configuration is generally per-user. In fact, 12 years of
development, setup authoring and enterprise engineering has convinced me that
it's generally per-machine. Even Windows Installer TAO seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bob Arnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: WiX Users wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] How do I preserve properties betweenINSTALL/UNINSTALL?
I don't agree that installation and configuration are automatically distinct
nor
@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] How do I preserve properties betweenINSTALL/UNINSTALL?
I don't agree that installation and configuration are automatically distinct
nor do I agree that configuration is generally per-user. In fact, 12 years
Richard wrote:
Haven't you ever worked on a project where some enhancements are
postponed in favor of working on More Important Things?
More importantly, there's an easy pattern to do the same thing without
custom actions. I'd rather the MSI team do the things in the engine that
can't be
I'm afraid you lost me there. Just about everything inside the MSI engine can
be one outside of MSI.
The reason I think this should be a built-in pattern of MSI isn't because I'm
lazy or something, it's because I've spent a lot of time in the field working
on this and I know it would be
Christopher Painter wrote:
I never understood why MSI doesn't have this automatic state saver
pattern built in.
Me either. Does anyone inside MS know why there isn't a mechanism to
accomplish this?
Regards
Richard
* C O N F I D E N T I A L I T Y N O T I C E *
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Me either. Does anyone inside MS know why there isn't a mechanism to
accomplish this?
Haven't you ever worked on a project where some enhancements are
postponed in favor of working on More Important Things?
I tire of the endless
Tell me Rich, in a declarative programming language where custom actions are
`evil` just who AM I supposed to complain to when I'm forced to color outside
the lines for something that is obviously missing even after 9 years of
production release?
I don't buy `configuration data is a
10 matches
Mail list logo