Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-24 Thread Tomer Cohen
:48 AM To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Cc: Alex Abugov Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch Still having the same problem. Tried different stuff: Changing the AssemblyFileVersion of my compiled assemblies - didn't help

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-19 Thread Tomer Cohen
Installer XML toolset.' Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch ...and to exapand on that, look for your files in the log. There should be a FileCopy that will say something like Won't Overwrite;Won't patch; and give you a reason

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-19 Thread Phil Wilson
toolset. Cc: Alex Abugov Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch Still having the same problem. Tried different stuff: Changing the AssemblyFileVersion of my compiled assemblies - didn't help. Not adding new files in the patch - didn’t help

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-14 Thread Tomer Cohen
. -Original Message- From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com] Sent: יום ד 13 מרץ 2013 17:06 To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch What does the verbose log file

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-13 Thread Tomer Cohen
: tome...@qualisystems.com Web: www.qualisystems.com -Original Message- From: Brian_Covington [mailto:briancoving...@yahoo.com] Sent: יום ד 13 מרץ 2013 06:02 To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch Sorry

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-13 Thread David Watson
: tome...@qualisystems.com Web: www.qualisystems.com -Original Message- From: Brian_Covington [mailto:briancoving...@yahoo.com] Sent: יום ד 13 מרץ 2013 06:02 To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch Sorry

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-13 Thread Tomer Cohen
: יום ד 13 מרץ 2013 16:04 To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch Did you increase the assemblyfileversion of those dlls? -Original Message- From: Tomer Cohen [mailto:tome

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-13 Thread Tomer Cohen
email] Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch Same results with versions 10.00.35.0004, 10.00.36.0004 (HF1), and 10.00.37.0004 (HF2). I am changing the bundle version as well as the version of the msi, but still the second patch for the bundle

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-13 Thread Rob Mensching
Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch Did you increase the assemblyfileversion of those dlls? -Original Message- From: Tomer Cohen [mailto:tome...@qualisystems.com] Sent: 13 March 2013 13:28 To: General

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-13 Thread Tomer Cohen
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch What does the verbose log file in the patch say the action states for the Components that you expect to be installed? Also, look at the File install log

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-13 Thread Rob Mensching
...@robmensching.com] Sent: יום ד 13 מרץ 2013 17:06 To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch What does the verbose log file in the patch say the action states for the Components

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-13 Thread Phil Wilson
components not supported. Phil -Original Message- From: Rob Mensching [mailto:r...@robmensching.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:24 AM To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-13 Thread Phil Wilson
: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch No... there is nothing in the documentation about that... Won't it make the .NET stop working, the assemblies are signed... if some are not in the same version, it won't find them... Thanks for the fast reply

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-12 Thread Tomer Cohen
. -Original Message- From: Brian_Covington [mailto:briancoving...@yahoo.com] Sent: יום ה 15 נובמבר 2012 00:41 To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch Same results with versions 10.00.35.0004

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2013-03-12 Thread Brian_Covington
- Second Patch does not supersede first Patch Same results with versions 10.00.35.0004, 10.00.36.0004 (HF1), and 10.00.37.0004 (HF2). I am changing the bundle version as well as the version of the msi, but still the second patch for the bundle appears alongside the first one, not replacing

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2012-11-14 Thread Brian_Covington
Same results with versions 10.00.35.0004, 10.00.36.0004 (HF1), and 10.00.37.0004 (HF2). I am changing the bundle version as well as the version of the msi, but still the second patch for the bundle appears alongside the first one, not replacing it as I would expect. Do I need to do something to

[WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2012-11-06 Thread Brian_Covington
Hi all, I have created a managed bootstrapper to install my 2 product msis. I have peared down the source of this bootstrapper to create a patch bootstrapper, to install the msp files for these products. Everything works as expected until I try to install the second patch. It installs along

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2012-11-06 Thread Rob Mensching
Is the second bundle version higher? If not, then it doesn't upgrade the old bundle. On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Brian_Covington briancoving...@yahoo.comwrote: Hi all, I have created a managed bootstrapper to install my 2 product msis. I have peared down the source of this

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2012-11-06 Thread Goran
I am guessing that you have intentionally do that, in order to allow two parallel installations of the same application on one PC? In cases where only one application can exist on one PC, is it possible to deny existence of parallel applications, so it will always upgrade? -- View this message

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2012-11-06 Thread Brian C
. From: Rob Mensching r...@robmensching.com To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 10:27 AM Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

Re: [WiX-users] Managed Bootstrapper - Second Patch does not supersede first Patch

2012-11-06 Thread Brian_Covington
Forgive me, but, I do not quite understand what you are asking. The first application is dependant upon the second and cannot exist in singular (i.e. it is built on top of the others' dlls). -- View this message in context: