Stop this messages pls
You have subscribed to this mailing list in the first place
To unsubscrribe please go to
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
Chee Meng Au Yong
http://auyong.homeunix.net
Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or
No the plugin doesn't use the results. The aim of the plugin is just to get
the ID of all the posts from the current pages $posts array run a DB query
to grab the first image assosiated with each post. The one it picks is
determined by the menu order so that I can choose which image is shown.
Quick questions (and hopefully quick answers :) ) about this subject:
Let's say a user has been using SECRET_KEY since v2.5, and has not
changed that when 2.6 came. So, he doesn't have AUTH_KEY,
SECURE_AUTH_KEY nor LOGGED_IN_KEY in his wp-config.php, but he does
have SECRET_KEY. Does WP fallback
The existing cookies will become invalid, so the user will have to re-login.
Thanks a lot for those clear answers, they validate what I understood
already, but I wanted to be sure (writing a book can make you nitpicky
:) ).
If so, how can they be best avoided (apart from
hi all,
one of the worst nightmares is autosave.
would you guys, gifted programmers, be so kind to design a button to
switch autosave off?
i will be thankful all my live :-)
researcher
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Hey,
Just wondering. Is the WP 2.6.5 security flaw fixed in the most recent
update of 2.7?
Thanks.
Paul.
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
From: researchfirst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
one of the worst nightmares is autosave.
would you guys, gifted programmers, be so kind to design a button to
switch autosave off?
You can ameliorate your nightmares with a plugin [1] until it's part of
core.
[1]
I don't think so mate.
--
From: Paul Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:41 PM
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Subject: [wp-testers] Just wondering
Hey,
Just wondering. Is the WP 2.6.5 security flaw fixed in the
Yes. Has been for a week.
See here:
http://trac.wordpress.org/changeset/9769
http://trac.wordpress.org/changeset/9753
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Paul Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Just wondering. Is the WP 2.6.5 security flaw fixed in the most recent
update of 2.7?
Thanks.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Xavier Borderie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's more of a how to prevent/avoid such breakage, but I wasn't sure
login issues was the only problem that could pop up with these keys.
Ahh. Well, prevention of one known and minor potential problem could
be
The version info banner in the newly-released 2.6.5 version seems to be
saying that you are using a development version and is linking off to
the svn. Is this right?
--
mrmist
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
No, that's not right, 2.6.5 is a branch release not a trunk
(development) release and should update from the branch not SVN. Someone
other than I should be addressing this though. Anyone?
On 11/25/2008 5:08 PM, mrmist wrote:
The version info banner in the newly-released 2.6.5 version seems to
This also could be the reason that the WordPress Automatic Upgrades
plugin isn't showing an alert about a new version being available (I'm
checking a client's 2.6.3 site at the moment). WAUP never fails to show
an alert. I'm surprised someone more in the know isn't coming back on
this.
On
Ahh good. Thanks Otto. :-)
2008/11/25 Otto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. Has been for a week.
See here:
http://trac.wordpress.org/changeset/9769
http://trac.wordpress.org/changeset/9753
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Paul Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey,
Just wondering. Is the WP
Hmm, this is weird (or perhaps not). I downloaded the changed files from
svn, uploaded them to my remote site and the remote install Dashboard says
development Version. Then copied the same files to my local install and
the local Dashboard doesn't say Development Version. Just to be clear, I
only
I had an alert via the FF plugin...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirk M
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:57 PM
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] 2.6.5 version banner showing development version
This also
I see the DB Schema was changed again with the latest trunk build. I thought
that beta 3 meant that a RC1 release was close.
Looking forward to the final build :-)
Philip
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Why is there an active Delete link next to the admin account on the
Users page?
Kim
ps/ I haven't clicked it as I don't want to deal with what would happen
if it actually does delete the only account in this install.
___
wp-testers mailing list
The DB changes were just setting default options, Sometimes people forget
to add the add_option() to the DB schema when they add options to core.. :)
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:23:33 +1100, Philip Reschke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I see the DB Schema was changed again with the latest trunk
I got a half a good mind to just take beta 3, edit the version file to make
it say RC 1 and send it to people who ask, just to mess with 'em, and then
sit back and laugh when the real RC1 comes out. ;-P
-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:43 PM, DD32 [EMAIL
I get this PHP error loading the plugins page in WP 2.7:
[25-Nov-2008 21:32:52] PHP Warning: Illegal offset type in isset or
empty in .../public_html/wp/wp-admin/includes/update.php on line 150
that would be here:
function wp_plugin_update_row( $file, $plugin_data ) {
$current =
Have noticed two issues with image uploading in beta 3. Not earthshaking,
but regressions from the way uploading was handled in earlier WP versions:
1) After having uploaded an image, clicking the None button does not clear
the Link URL field. Instead, I have to delete the link in that field
YES! I've noticed this issue as well and it is really annoying. I
thought thats how it worked!
Philip Barron wrote:
2) No matter where the insertion point (the cursor) is in the entry text,
the image code always ends up placed at the very end of the entry. As a
result, I have to cut and paste
I'm not getting these problems in FF 3.0.4, on Windows Vista, r9896, but
I'm getting another issue. When uploading an image with the flash
uploader the image is uploaded but image properties doesn't show. In
other words I have to click on the gallery tab to insert the image to
the post. Works
24 matches
Mail list logo
