I'm encountering a situation where the_excerpt somehow returns empty
excerpts for. I first encountered this in a custom post type where I had an
excerpt but then emptied the excerpt field and updated the post. Afterwards
the excerpt on index pages was empty. I tried replicating this with a
regular
I had the same problem and thought it was a plugin. I disabled all my
plugins and nothing worked. So tried a clean install and still had the
same problem.
I gave up trying to fix it, as no one else seem to have the problem on
the forums. So I worked around it with...
?php $excerpt =
if the
string length of the excerpt is 55 or less then don't display. Anyway,
hoped this helped.
- Original Message -
From: Krusty Ruffle krustyruf...@rustykruffle.com
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 8:55 AM
Subject: [wp-testers] WordPress 3.0: problem
Okay, I start a post, fill in excerpt, save draft, delete excerpt, then
publish post, look at category archives and the post has an excerpt...
Apparently this only effects posts that have been published then had the
excerpt removed.
I'll give Darren's code a try after a bit, I had some vague
, 2010 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] WordPress 3.0: problem with empty
excerptsbeingreturned by the_excerpt()
Okay, I start a post, fill in excerpt, save draft, delete excerpt, then
publish post, look at category archives and the post has an excerpt...
Apparently this only effects posts
.
- Original Message - From: Krusty Ruffle
krustyruf...@rustykruffle.com
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] WordPress 3.0: problem with empty
excerptsbeingreturned by the_excerpt()
Okay, I start a post, fill in excerpt, save draft
Okay, here is what's happening:
I'm testing stuff so I'm inserting text with a firefox lipsum extension, it
leaves trailing newlines after inserting text. If you select the text in the
excerpt input on the edit post page and miss the newline it will cause empty
strings to be returned in pages
Hi,
I just solved it by installing the plugin, excerpts editor. I have a PHP
programmer friend take a look at it couldn't solve the problem.
Kathy
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Krusty Ruffle
krustyruf...@rustykruffle.com wrote:
Okay, here is what's happening:
I'm testing stuff so
It took me a little bit but I figured out that it can be solved in
/wp-includes/formatting.php
change line 1825 from:
if( '' == $text ) {
to:
if ( '' == trim ( $text ) ) {
Editing core files is not something I like to do though...
Looking at that plugin, it does a lot more than what I need
I honestly don't know if this is the right list, but on
http://wordpress.org/download/, it says 2.2 MB for .zip and 2.0 MB for
.tar.gz. That's quite inaccurate since the zip is 3 MB and tar is 2.7
MB. Anyone know how to get the WP team to change it?
--
Tech163
http://fusionswift.com/
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:38 AM, ovadia moshe 4bizr...@gmail.com wrote:
while using single site everything work great!! while enable multisite and
administrating in the sub site trying to work with menu ( with the same
theme ) it say The current theme does not natively support menus but this
solve the problem , change to default theme (2010) and changing back to the
theme again and the menu start working.
2010/6/15 Andrew Nacin w...@andrewnacin.com
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:38 AM, ovadia moshe 4bizr...@gmail.com wrote:
while using single site everything work great!! while
Thanks, will give that a test
- ben
On 12 May 2010 00:59, Andrew Nacin w...@andrewnacin.com wrote:
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/14574
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/14574You'll see it in tomorrow's
nightly build.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Ben Huson
When adding custom classes to menu items, if I add multiple classes
separated by a space, the spaces are removed.
I presume this is how you are supposed to add multiple classes?
- Ben
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
If I had to guess, we're using sanitize_html_class, which sanitizes
one class only. I'll take care of it.
On 5/11/10, Ben Huson b...@thewhiteroom.net wrote:
When adding custom classes to menu items, if I add multiple classes
separated by a space, the spaces are removed.
I presume this is how
Thanks, just thought I'd let you know
- Ben
On 11 May 2010 23:25, Andrew Nacin w...@andrewnacin.com wrote:
If I had to guess, we're using sanitize_html_class, which sanitizes
one class only. I'll take care of it.
On 5/11/10, Ben Huson b...@thewhiteroom.net wrote:
When adding custom classes
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/14574
http://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/14574You'll see it in tomorrow's
nightly build.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Ben Huson b...@thewhiteroom.net wrote:
Thanks, just thought I'd let you know
- Ben
On 11 May 2010 23:25, Andrew Nacin
Just noticed that if you create a custom post type, when you edit a
custom post of that type the yellow message feedback box says Post
updated. View post.
It should say [My Custom Post Type] updated. View [My Custom Post Type]
- Ben
___
wp-testers
We're currently working on a lot of these issues. Most likely, we will not
be offering these strings during the register_post_type process, but instead
will allow plugins to filter the giant $messages array that appears in
edit-form-advanced.php. See also
Hi All
My first post here so please let me know if you need anything more. I
have downloaded the Beta 2 and been testing some of the features. When
trying to setup permalinks in this version it is forcing me to have
index.php prefix the URL:
/index.php/%category%/%postname%/
I am using this on
This is a known bug, There is a trac ticket for this, I've got a
half-finished patch for it, But havnt had the time to finalise it.
Ok, The part that you cant remove index.php is part of the bug, The fact its
not detecting mod_rewrite is a seperate issue which triggers the first.
What are the
The sites that are working are all 2.9.x. The server details are:
PHP Version 5.2.12
MySQL 5.1.43
Linux
Modules:
ore mod_authn_file mod_authn_default mod_authz_host
mod_authz_groupfile mod_authz_user mod_authz_default mod_auth_basic
mod_include mod_filter mod_deflate mod_log_config mod_logio
Hey,
thanks for the beta, but I have a little problem using MU. One RewriteRule
seems to be damaged.
Statement from my logfiles:
[Sat Apr 03 12:37:02 2010] [alert] [client xx]
/xxx/wordpress/.htaccess: RewriteRule: bad argument line
'^([_0-9a-zA-Z-]+/)?files/(.+)'
Another point is:
Hey,
no I'm using Apache2, but yes the vhosts - rules work fine, thanks.
Christian
Am 03.04.2010 um 12:55 schrieb Andrew Nacin:
One RewriteRule seems to be damaged.
Statement from my logfiles:
[Sat Apr 03 12:37:02 2010] [alert] [client xx]
/xxx/wordpress/.htaccess: RewriteRule:
Hey,
small addon:
WordPress: 3.0-beta1
PHP: 5.2.6-1+lenny8
MySQL: 5.0.51a-24+lenny3-log
WebServer: Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) mod_fastcgi/2.4.6 PHP/5.2.6-1+lenny8 with
Suhosin-Patch mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0
Am 03.04.2010 um 12:58 schrieb Christian Jantz:
Hey,
no I'm using Apache2, but yes
In the past, when a new beta has been released, I have been able to get
it via auto-update on my alpha install (running bleeding edge nightlies).
I have updated my alpha install via auto-update this AM, and the
dashboard is still saying 3.0-alpha.
Anyone else having this issue?
Kim
Anyone else having this issue?
Kim
Yep, same thing on my blog http://www.duechiacchiere.it
From version.php
$wp_version = '3.0-alpha';
$wp_db_version = 13802;
Well, it's not a big deal, just curious...
___
wp-testers mailing list
Same here. I'm using the WP-Beta-Tester plugin set at Bleeding edge in
order to keep updated with the latest nightlies. After updating this
morning I'm still seeing WordPress 3.0-alpha in the admin footer. is
beta 1 not pushed via the trunk or was there just an oversight in
updating the admin
I would say that the version number just hasn't been changed as when
you go into the menu editor it warns you that this is currently a beta
the interface will change soon.
My 2 cents (or pennies in my case, lol) any way.
Paul.
On 3 April 2010 15:57, due chiacchiere i...@duechiacchiere.it
Excellent news! Not getting the beta via the WP-Beta-Tester plugin
though. Admin footer text still states; WordPress 3.0-alpha. Just FYI. :-)
On 04/02/2010 11:21 PM, Jane Wells wrote:
Hey beta testers! Beta 1 is out! Here's some info to get you started and
a link to the zip file.
Hi Paul,
I stated that yesterday as well before the beta was released. Or maybe
the beta actually was released with yesterday's build and not announced
until today? I know it takes a day or so to push new builds to the
official download server.
On 04/03/2010 11:00 AM, Paul Robinson wrote:
Word from Jane Wells Matt Martz on Twitter is that the nightly build
was generated before the Beta 1 zip. We should get Beta 1 in tonight's
nightly.
Kim
Kirk M wrote:
Hi Paul,
I stated that yesterday as well before
Ahh, ok. Thanks Kim. :)
On 3 April 2010 18:04, Kim Parsell kparsell...@kpdesign.net wrote:
Word from Jane Wells Matt Martz on Twitter is that the nightly build was
generated before the Beta 1 zip. We should get Beta 1 in tonight's nightly.
Kim
The nightly was packaged a few hours before we bumped the version. You'll
see beta1 in your footer tomorrow.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Kirk M kmb4...@gmail.com wrote:
Excellent news! Not getting the beta via the WP-Beta-Tester plugin
though. Admin footer text still states; WordPress
Hey beta testers! Beta 1 is out! Here's some info to get you started
and a link to the zip file.
http://wp.me/p4Ez4-l1
Jane
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
The blog ayudawordpress.com had noticed that WordPress 3.0 Alpha was
released to beta testers, but don't informed the download link..
Anybody knows if its true and where i can download it ?
Thanks !
Guga Alves
www.TudoParaWordPress.com.br
___
Thanks Peter, plugin installed ! :D
Guga Alves
www.TudoParaWordPress.com.br
2009/12/23 Peter Westwood peter.westw...@ftwr.co.uk
On 23 Dec 2009, at 12:13, Guga Alves wrote:
The blog ayudawordpress.com had noticed that WordPress 3.0 Alpha was
released to beta testers, but don't informed
I've seen rumblings across the WordPress community about whether or not
WordPress 2.7 should really be branded as WordPress 3.0 due in large
part to the changes that have taken place both on the feature and UI
front. I was wondering if I could get an official word from Ryan Boren
or Matt if
Hear hear to that, its an overhaul not an upgrade!
On Nov 18, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Jeff Chandler wrote:
I've seen rumblings across the WordPress community about whether or
not WordPress 2.7 should really be branded as WordPress 3.0 due in
large part to the changes that have taken place both
+1 on this :-)
Adam Hunter ha scritto:
I've seen rumblings across the WordPress community about whether or
not WordPress 2.7 should really be branded as WordPress 3.0 due in
large part to the changes that have taken place both on the feature
and UI front. I was wondering if I could get an
I offer the one vote of dissent. Let's keep the version numbering as it is,
please.
That is all.
-Pat
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jeff Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I've seen rumblings across the WordPress community about whether or not
WordPress 2.7 should really be branded as
For WP 3.0: +1
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
I really don't have an issue with the version number. Seems like many
other people do.
Paleo Pat wrote:
I offer the one vote of dissent. Let's keep the version numbering as it is,
please.
That is all.
-Pat
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jeff Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I've
On 11/18/08 11:07 AM, Paleo Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I offer the one vote of dissent. Let's keep the version numbering as it is,
please.
That is all.
-Pat
Apple has rather a peculiar numbering technique, where major upgrades to its
operating system get a .1 revision, so 10.4
I can't see it being a big deal, if I'm honest. Keeping the versioning as it
is will prevent anyone becoming confused, as it has already been announced
to the world as 2.7. Why change it now, so close to it's release date?
George Pearce
http://www.fused.org.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/11/18 Jeff
For WordPress 3.0!: +1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis
Morhardt
Sent: Martes, 18 de Noviembre de 2008 16:10
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] WordPress 3.0?
For WP 3.0: +1
I disagree with changing it to 3.0. Although the differences are
significant, skipping the 2.4 release was confusing enough. Plus, the
community is already used to 2.7.
I think changing it to 3.0 would be completely unnecessary, and would be
nothing more than a marketing ploy.
On 11/18/08,
@lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] WordPress 3.0?
For WP 3.0: +1
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-testers
___
wp
On 11/18/08 11:17 AM, Nathan Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree with changing it to 3.0. Although the differences are
significant, skipping the 2.4 release was confusing enough. Plus, the
community is already used to 2.7.
I think changing it to 3.0 would be completely
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jeff Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen rumblings across the WordPress community about whether or not
WordPress 2.7 should really be branded as WordPress 3.0 due in large part to
the changes that have taken place both on the feature and UI front. I was
I'd say, leave the version count(s) alone. It's 2.7 now, it won't really
be that long until it reaches 3.0 anyway. 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 ...
Well, it might seem to take long, but really it won't be. :P
___
wp-testers mailing list
Hi.
I would keep the straight versioning.
Instead, I would like to see a new branch left as legacy!
I mean, since the 2.1 legacy branch a lot of things and features had
changed, and to this moment there's no another more updated legacy branch.
Why would be needed a legacy branch? Why Ubuntu is
Agreed -1
Tony Scott
http://tonyscott.org.uk | http://uk.wordcamp.org
- Original Message
From: mrmist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
Sent: Tuesday, 18 November, 2008 18:37:12
Subject: Re: [wp-testers] WordPress 3.0?
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Idled Soul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say, leave the version count(s) alone. It's 2.7 now, it won't really be
that long until it reaches 3.0 anyway. 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 ... Well, it
might seem to take long, but really it won't be. :P
Version numbers aren't
It would seem that sentiment is pretty strong in the user community as
well in support of a version 3.0.
http://technosailor.com/2008/11/18/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-wordpress-27/
On 11/18/08, Gene Steinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/18/08 11:17 AM, Nathan Rice [EMAIL
Hey Dan,
You any relation to Ann Coulter?
Just wondering... :)
-Pat
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Dan Coulter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Idled Soul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say, leave the version count(s) alone. It's 2.7 now, it won't really
be
Dan Coulter wrote:
Version numbers aren't decimal. If you add 0.1 onto 2.9, you get 2.10.
Just look at version 2.0.11.
Ah ha! My bad... I still think it should be left as 2.7 though, like
someone else has stated earlier, it's been introduced as that and would
cause confusion if changed now.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Paleo Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You any relation to Ann Coulter?
I hope not.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Idled Soul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Coulter wrote:
Version numbers aren't decimal. If you add 0.1 onto 2.9, you get 2.10.
Just look at
But i'll really like if it turns into Wordpress 3.0
3.0 +1
2008/11/18, Dan Coulter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Paleo Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You any relation to Ann Coulter?
I hope not.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Idled Soul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt has made this perfectly clear several times before. It's not
going to happen.
WordPress 2.7 is a major release. Next will be 2.8, followed by 2.9,
and then 3.0. So sayeth the word from up-on-high.
So, Wordpress's first two version numbers are decimal. Get used to it.
You any relation to Ann Coulter?
I hope not.
ROFLMAO! Thank you. Best good laugh I've had in a while now. :-)))
-Paleo Pat
http://www.politicalbyline.com
___
wp-testers mailing list
wp-testers@lists.automattic.com
On Nov 18, 2008, at 1:59 PM, Otto wrote:
WordPress 2.7 is a major release. Next will be 2.8, followed by 2.9,
and then 3.0. So sayeth the word from up-on-high.
So, Wordpress's first two version numbers are decimal. Get used to it.
No disrespect intended to Matt, but... it's goofy! First
62 matches
Mail list logo
