Re: [WSG] Programmer's Challenge [Virus checkedAU]

And for extra points, the ability to specify an x-y screen coordinate to place the cursor at, initiating a mouseover event before taking the screenshot?? Then you could say place the mouse at 210,452 (or whatever) and see the mouseover effect (:hover) of an element on your page to make sure that

RE: [WSG] Programmer's Challenge [Virus checkedAU]

Sounds like another job for Google's pigeons... http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html Cheers Mark -- Mark Stanton Technical Director Gruden Pty Ltd Tel: 9956 6388 Mob: 0410 458 201 Fax: 9956 8433 http://www.gruden.com

Re: [WSG] Going Mad with pleasing the browsers

I'm trying to avoid using hacks if possible. Now what I need to find out is what are the causes of the problems. Feeling so dazed by all these. Best Wishes Jaime ---Original Message--- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 02/03/04 12:05:22 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WSG]

Re: [WSG] Flowchart using CSS

I find this problem to be intriguing. My main client asked the very same thing about a year. Thankfully, the onus was on his internal staff making the diagrams, and for me to develop a template of sorts (or some sort of start-off tutorial for them). My initial idea was to tutor them the basics

Re: [WSG] Going Mad with pleasing the browsers

That's the thing though - you'll have to use hacks. Now, hacks are commonplace in order to maintain browser compatibility in CSS. We can all entend a big poop-covered handshake over to our Microsoft boys for placing us in this position. Understand that it is the fault of the browsers and not

[WSG] [OT] Is MT bad?

An amusing article about blogging: Why your Movable Type blog must die http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/2/2/171117/8823 I hope this is not too offtopic. Tonico -- Tonico Strasser ?:-) http://Tonico.FreeZope.org Contact_Tonico at Yahoo dot de Check out http://www.WebProducer.at

RE: [WSG] Browser / OS combo irregularity

It seems there is an incorrect use of alt tags here - correct tagging would assist use of image mapping See this article http://diveintoaccessibility.org/day_24_providing_text_equivalents_for_image_maps.html WP Wendy Phillips Job Ready (Learning Development) Customer Sales Service

Re: [WSG] Browser / OS combo irregularity

Veine, Ryan's mentioned a few good arguments against image maps - maintenance and load time. I think there is a far bigger issue that was touched on but not explored - accessibility. start long rave Many people assume that accessibility means blind users with screen readers. However,

Re: [WSG] Some more links...

Not being that Mac savy, I assume it's possible to have both v1.0 and v1.2 installed on the same machine? Safari 1.2 is out for mac-heads: http://www.apple.com/safari/ * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

[WSG] reply to Safari question

Hi people, this is my first mail, I am very glad to become part of this site, as It has raised my awareness of compatabilities heaps! Safari V 1.2 Actually takes over the old safari which expires. they are still having a few javascripting issues where some scripts still wont work. I am

[WSG] DOM scripting

Hi, I just updated my blog at: http://andreasson.org/, using some DOM scripting à la Flash. Please give me some feedback, I've never done this kind of stuff before (and haven't tested it a lot yet). cheers, /Anton - got to get some sleep now.. -- What your body lacks, your head compensates.

Re: [WSG] reply to Safari question

Now THAT's a smart idea - old browsers that expire. If only IE and NN did that! Peter Safari V 1.2 Actually takes over the old safari which expires. they are still having a few javascripting issues where some scripts still wont work. * The

[WSG] Image floating question

Hi all, With two images, one floated left and the right, is there any way to force the page scroll horizontally instead of the right image dropping underneath the left when the width of the browser window becomes less than the combined widths of the images? eg .logo1 { float:left;

Re: [WSG] reply to Safari question

thanks for clarifying that justin. I thought about my comment realized that it is with os update that it happens, so thanks for correcting me... * The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Re: [WSG] Image floating question

Well, it's always going to float to the right of whatever's containing it, so if the container is only set to the browser width (100%) it'll collapse. -- Cameron W: www.themaninblue.com __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!

Re: [WSG] Image floating question

If the page is to be set 100% of the viewport, which is 600px, the combined 800px of the two logos would definitely cause the second to fall below the first logo. You'll need to encase the two logos in a container that is at least 800px wide for the two to sit side by side. Lucian On Feb 4,

Re: [WSG] reply to Safari question

Justin, Perhaps Safari needs a developer edition Nice idea. What I guess happens at present is that the web kit that drives Safari, Mail (and iTunes?) is the important part of the update, and this is something that is available system-wide. So there would have to be a way of running different

Re: [WSG] Image floating question

Umm, I dont think so, but I am not really sure what that is - guessing IE iFrame thingy? If so then probably not :-) Thanks James On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 17:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi james, you don't want to use an Inline frame?, that would fix your problem , but then again, goes