Kevin,
I used to do all my FTP task in a shell session. Transmit surely beats
that when it comes to synchronising ;)
I'm quite a command line junky like Paul. It gives you enormous
power if you know to push the right buttons.
So, in conclusion. One of the best tools available on mac these
Hi,
I've been working on a redesign of a site for sportsclubs here in
Belgium.
Up till now I've always used the old fashioned table layout but I
wanted to make
a change.
Now, this is the template : http://www.nsworx.be/_template.php
and this is the CSS behind it :
in:
#footer {
position: relative;
float: left;
width: 752px;
}
#footer p {
text-align: center;
color: #FFF;
text-size: 85%;
padding-top: 15px;
padding-bottom: 15px;
background: url(../_images/bg_h5.png);
there's probably only 10 ASP.NET developers on list that this might
apply to and probably 9 that have already read this -
but just in case you're the one that missed out this (updated) article
might be of some help
A C# class to make your ASP.NET pages XHTML valid
Hi All,
I've been working on a site which needs a background graphic centred in the
viewport but with two different colours on the right left...
I managed to get most of it working by setting a background image colour
for the body which efectively give one colour one side and another the
Sorry for wasting folks time.
After looking at it for ages, I attacked it from a completely differnt angle
and it's working ok now (I get some extra height on IE mac but that is
bearable).
Tania
- Original Message -
From: Tania Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On 10/11/04 12:43 AM Tania Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
The designer wanted the background image to show on larger screens if
possible, and while it involved some tweaking to get the various browsers to
accept the 100% height, and it's working on win 6 Moz, IE Mac 5.2 etc, but
I'm
Hi all,
Just though I should share this nice open source HTML text editor that
produces valid XHTML.
http://www.fckeditor.net/
Enjoy!
Kind Regards
Jacobus van Niekerk
Creative Consultant
web: http://www.catics.com/ | http://www.freelancecontractors.com
tel: +
It's nice, and valid, but in this case valid doesn't mean clean.
This is what I just came up with when playing with it:
---
Thspan style=font-family: times new roman;is i/spans span
style=background-color: rgb(255, 102, 0);sospan style=font-family:
comic sans ms;m/spane/span strongsspan
Interesting how this comes up around the same time .NET and the
frustrations of validation appears in the Web Standards Project Buzz
for October 2004 at http://webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2004_10.html
Barry Beattie wrote:
there's probably only 10 ASP.NET developers on list that this might
I'm that developer, as I didn't know about it, very interesting!!!
In fact with our cms we make sites html 4.01 compliant but with the transitional
schema because of dot.net viewstate and things like that...but with it we can
reconsider an XHML approach for new clients!!
Cheers Barry!
Nothing wrong with using WYSIWYGs - so long as they are standards-compliant. I tell
you what - if you can get our WYSIWYG to create non-standards compliant markup, we'll
get you a Firefox t-shirt. Use the link below, this version will run in Firefox PR1:
http://xstandard.com/misc/beta/x-pro.exe
Hi Jacobus,
The editor in question uses the MSHTML control built into IE. It's an HTML 4 editor
based on a 5 year old version of FrontPage. This control is no longer updated and as
far as I know, it is impossible to get it to create standards-compliant markup.
Jacobus, I am one of the
If anyone is interested, I have done the same thing using another
method. Instead of relying on text search and replace, you can just
create your own HTMLTextWriter. I use XHTMLTextWriter when I want to
write XHTML, and the standard when I don't. It's a wee bit more robust
that way, perhaps even
Me three, er...i mean... I like DWMX04 as well.
The pop-up code help is great.
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
mlinc.com
Get FireFox http://spreadfirefox.com/community/?q=affiliatesid=0t=1
On Oct 10, 2004, at 8:38 PM, John Oxton wrote:
I would second
I´ve been using DMX2004 too. Also Contribute to tempate pages and Check in /
check out to colaborative developement. It´s pretty good!
Genau Lopes Júnior
WebDesigner
¬¬¬
http://www.meucarronovo.com.br
- Original Message -
From: Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
XStandard rocks! It took me a few minutes to get it working in our CMS. Their approach
to styles and CSS is very flexible and simple. I have not seen anything even close to
their accessibility support.
The free version is certainly usable is a customer solution.
Licensing is very competitive
After solved some problems in my local machine I uploaded my page model to
my blog.
Well, know it ignores layout settings !!! :(
I've tried to access css file in the same way my page did and I can, so...
I'm very blind about the problem. May be two fresh eyes could see what I'm
losing to see.
Hey Javier,
Little mistake in the end in the style bit.
style type=text/css media=all@import
url(skins/javier/markup.css);/style --
Ditch the two -- marks and it'll work ;)
.K
On 11 Oct 2004, at 21:43, Javier wrote:
After solved some problems in my local machine I uploaded my page
model to
I was actually hunting around for something like this just yesterday!
It's not perfect - but it's not the worst thing I've seen either. Thanks for
the link.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jacobus van Niekerk
Sent: Monday, 11
On 11/10/2004 at 22:11 Kristof Rutten wrote:
Hey Javier,
Little mistake in the end in the style bit.
style type=text/css media=all@import
url(skins/javier/markup.css);/style --
Ditch the two -- marks and it'll work ;)
Thanks for your reply.
When I saw my page didn't work, I've
After a bit of searching, I found a site that explains how to get fixed
positioning in IE. This is great news for me, since I really would like
such a thing on the design of one of my sites. Trouble is, I'm having a
difficult time incorporating it into my existing CSS, and I'm wondering
if
On 11/10/2004 at 22:11 Kristof Rutten wrote:
Hey Javier,
Little mistake in the end in the style bit.
style type=text/css media=all@import
url(skins/javier/markup.css);/style --
Ditch the two -- marks and it'll work ;)
Ignore my previous mail.
I've decided to upload to my blog the
Hi all,
I have been noticing more CSS questions coming onto the list. This is all
cool. One of our main aims is to help developers move towards web
standards/best practice.
However, if you are just getting into CSS it might be worth your time
reading a few CSS classic articles:
Position is
john wrote:
The page with the CSS code for fixed positioning in IE is at
http://limpid.nl/lab/css/fixed/header
Interesting...although I wonder why Anne didn't actually construct
proper html documents with a html, head and body...because it seems to
work in that situation as well?
Patrick H.
Hi,
Actually CSS is the main reason I joined here. Since I am teaching
myself how to do all of this, I try to join where the information is
reported to be excellent.
Here is another excellent link for css information.
http://westciv.com/
[cssaddict] aka Debbie
On Windows I use Crimson Editor (sorry, can't provide a link right now, but
I'm sure Google can), which shares many of the same features as SubEthaEdit,
such as syntax colouring for multiple languages. In fact, in Crimson this is
extensible through syntax modules, so in theory it could support ANY
Thanks, Russ - yes, there are some great articles
around and I have printed out so many and bookmarked so many it is
hard to keep track. I find that as a beginner to CSS the main problem
is actually recognising just what each problem is. Sometimes when
something doesn't work as one expects it
I almost thought a problem that had been plaguing me for ages (apart from Howard) had
been solved by this until I tried to view it in Mac/IE5.0. No scrollbar appears until
a link is clicked (fixed positioning). In the time it takes to load the next page a
scrollbar appears on the first page.
In
Here are all my resources I use so far...
http://www.trovster.com/resources.html
Still with a lot to sort out...!!
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:13:40 +0800, Lyn Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Russ - yes, there are some great articles around and I have
printed out so many and
Hi all
As per Russ' request this thread is now closed. There is a category for
development and design tools on the WSG website which as WSG members you
are all welcome to use and update.
This thread is being closed because it has been discussed at least three
times already in pretty lengthy
These links have now been added to the Resources section of the Web
Standards Group website, under 'CSS Browser Bugs and Problems' at:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/resources/#cat23
There are many more CSS resources here as well:
CSS General Resources:
i use jEdit, which is a Java-based (thus nicely cross-platform), free,
open source, well featured programmers' text editor. it has lots of
tasty features including syntax highlighting for pretty much anything
you can think of, folding, etc etc a very active developer
community, and lots of
Hi
I'm getting a little confused with when to use the following hack:
width:760px;
\width:770px;
w\idth:760px
Is it something that should be used on every container/wrapper? What
happens if I don't use it? I've seen some CSS on sites that use it
everwhere and then others that don't...
Thanks
I've solved the Mac scrollbar problem.
http://www.homebass.info/fixedPosTest/
Now the only issue left (besides that it uses CSS hacks) is that the back to top link
only takes you to the top of the content div minus the height of the header.
Grant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Is it something that should be used on every container/wrapper? What
happens if I don't use it? I've seen some CSS on sites that use it
everwhere and then others that don't...
What happens if you don't use it? Depending on the way you lay out your
pages, earlier versions of IE (and the
I would also add
D. Longevity of design - if the site is only going to be live for 9
weeks you can be pretty sure that future browsers will not have time to
choke on any hacks.
E. Tight design timelines - If your boss comes to you on wednesday
telling you that this new site needs to be
On 12 Oct 2004, at 1:27 PM, Focas, Grant wrote:
I've solved the Mac scrollbar problem.
http://www.homebass.info/fixedPosTest/
Now the only issue left (besides that it uses CSS hacks) is that the
back to top link only takes you to the top of the content div minus
the height of the header.
Grant
Using a body id will not work because the top of the page is alsways in
view. It is the top of the content div which is hidden. But the DOCTYPE
was wrong and its now fixed, thanks.
Grant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Nick Gleitzman
Sent:
On 12 Oct 2004, at 2:55 PM, Focas, Grant wrote:
Using a body id will not work because the top of the page is alsways in
view. It is the top of the content div which is hidden.
Well, in that case I've misunderstood what you're trying to do with the
link. In all my Mac browsers (IE5.2, Safari 1.2,
For me it goes to the top but not quite.
Safari 1.02 does make it go higher than Netscape 7.2 or IE5.2 but it
still doesn't go right to the top.
For instance, in Netscape 7.2 on Mac the back to top takes me back to
'Adapted from fixed positioning' not to 'Fixed header and footer'.
This isn't too
41 matches
Mail list logo
