We have encountered alignment issues
between our target browsers.
The code example below only works within
IE, all other browsers default to standard left alignment.
#datatable col.dt_currency {
/* Use for columns containing currency values only. */
text-align:
right;
}
table
Smells like Flash but isn't:
http://www.scottschiller.com/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
Friday, November 12, 2004, 1:46:31 AM, Philippe wrote:
But putting it in the same league as NN4 is unfair, to say the least.
I meant in terms of numbers, not of ability!
--
Iain
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Friday, November 12, 2004, 12:04:59 AM, Natalie wrote:
Normally, I wouldn't care about it, because it works fine in Safari,
but the client whom I am developing this for uses IE5 on the mac at
work.
Yes, the client's browser is the most important of all ;-)
Also, their target market may
Actually no, in Australia actually. It's not a matter of popularity,
but rather industry-specific quirkiness. Most
designers/advertising/media/publishing types use it here.
And I'd kill for a nice little powerbox and a g5 for home :)
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:57:54 +, Iain Harrison [EMAIL
On 11/12/04 12:57 AM Iain Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Here in the UK, the Mac was never
specially popular.
What's the data that supports that statement? Especially given that the Mac
holds the major proportion of designers' platform of choice!
(oops - this is off-topic for this
Friday, November 12, 2004, 9:12:15 AM, Rick wrote:
What's the data that supports that statement?
Sales figures. Market share. Web stats. Globally, the Mac is under
2.5% on web stats. In the UK, our web logs show less than 1% Macs.
--
Iain
On 11/12/04 1:21 AM Iain Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Sales figures. Market share. Web stats. Globally, the Mac is under
2.5% on web stats.
Gee, I wish *I* owned 2.5% of *any* global market! :-)
Rick Faaberg
**
The discussion
you know, that site is good (even though personally i don't like the
look)... but i must say... how practical is the technology used given
today's market? just a thought.
snaps for the guy's effort though.
scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
From: Scott Villarosa
you know, that site is good (even though personally i don't like the
look)... but i must say... how practical is the technology used given
today's market? just a thought.
As it's completely inaccessible when javascript is disabled/unavailable,
I'd say the market is
Ahhh thanks Philippe!
Yes!
line-height: normal;
Fixed it perfectly!
Thank you very much!
BOOKMARKED!
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On 12 Nov 2004, at 3:23 pm, Chris Stratford wrote:
www.neester.com/beta/
The navigation menu has extra pixels in the margin after: JOURNAL,
CALENDAR and UNIVERSITY...
As I understand it the technology is entirely practical. It is XHTML, DHTML
and java script driven, IMHO a huge step forward from Flash.
If you are in any doubt about this man's dedication have a look at
http://www.schillmania.com
it is an eyeopener.
Giles
-Original Message-
From:
Oh -- I see now it DOES work in MSIE 6...
I thought it was supposed to crash it?
--
Chris Hughes
http://www.epicure.demon.co.uk
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
yeah i think that came out a bit wrong, sorry bout that
was more in a funny kinda smirky way
like i said dont get me wrong i use some dhtml but in this case i think its a
bit over board
the site i am working on right now at 430 am had to be done in 3 days since the
original web designer did
I'm a Mac/Linux-on-occasion/PC-only-when-I-have-to user so I could be
wrong but:
!-- SCOTTSCHILLER V4.04: Now with more funk. --
!-- --
!-- This code may contain questionable ECMA- --
!-- script practices. Particularly in terms --
!-- of object-oriented,
i assume he's using win32 to describe the platform that win95+ applications
run on.
scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Lo
Sent: Friday, 12 November 2004 10:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Web Standards Eye Candy:
Title: Message
I
have
Adobe
Creative Suite
Dreamweaver
Homesite
Flash
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
12 November 2004 21:34To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: digest for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi peoples
I'm desperate for
Title: Message
Hmm...wonderful non-sequitur...
Oh...I
like bread by the way.
Patrick
-Original Message-From: Laurie Keith
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: 12 November 2004
12:04To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [WSG] RE:
digest for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
have
Adobe
Hope I'm # 10,000 :o) sorry, had to do it.
On 11/12/2004 7:58:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a good turn-out to Sydney's WSG meeting last night - with
over 24
people braving the pounding rain.
Scott Parsons did a great presentation on CSS Diagnosis - a detailed
breakdown into CSS
Hi,
If any of you busy people have a spare 15 minutes, can you give me an honest
evaluation on our new corporate web site.
http://www.createwith.com
I have my own opinions, but I would like to go back to the decision makers
with some independent comments from other professionals.
Regards,
On 12 Nov 2004, at 4:17 pm, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
IE 6 surprises me :/
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_j/head2.html
A solution:
ul {_display:inline-block}
And IE 6 is beaten into submission.
Philippe
---/---
Philippe Wittenbergh
now live : http://emps.l-c-n.com/
code | design | web projects :
If any of you busy people have a spare 15 minutes, can you give me an honest
evaluation on our new corporate web site.
My first attempt was a total bust. My main browser (FF) I do't
install anything - I use out of the box so that I see what users who
don't install see. So no Flash.
russ - maxdesign wrote:
OK, we have decided to give the person who did the 10,000th post a prize
(thanks to Core member David McDonald for the idea).
Re: Web Standards Eye Candy: http://www.scottschiller.com/
By Nick Lo - Fri 12 Nov 2004 at 10:33 PM
So, what does Nick win? One free copy of Apache
I concur with Susan.
Why goto the bother of doing it all in flash?
Because of the pure lack of content, you could have knocked that whole site
out in plain old html in less than an hour...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Susan R. Grossman
Well...,
Where to start
Load time, even on DSL it loads really slow, this site is not intended for
modem users at all (still the largest population of internet users) but on
the other hand, by looking at your branding work, seems like you don't
really cater to small clients, so you may not
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On 12 Nov 2004, at 4:17 pm, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
IE 6 surprises me :/
http://dev.l-c-n.com/_j/head2.html
A solution: ul {_display:inline-block}
And IE 6 is beaten into submission.
- Reading e-mail...
- milking the cows...
- feeding the herd...
- killing an
Laurie Keith wrote:
If any of you busy people have a spare 15 minutes, can you give me an honest
evaluation on our new corporate web site.
http://www.createwith.com
I have my own opinions, but I would like to go back to the decision makers
with some independent comments from other
Friday, November 12, 2004, 12:33:39 PM, Laurie wrote:
If any of you busy people have a spare 15 minutes, can you give me an honest
evaluation on our new corporate web site.
It appears not to be a web site: just a container for a slow,
bloated, inaccessible flash application, which is dull,
On 12 Nov 2004, at 12:33, Laurie Keith wrote:
If any of you busy people have a spare 15 minutes, can you give me an
honest
evaluation on our new corporate web site.
15 minutes spent so here goes:
http://www.createwith.com
http://with.shunuk.co.uk
It is just a simple mock-up but I wanted to show
Laurie Keith wrote:
If any of you busy people have a spare 15 minutes, can you give me an honest
evaluation on our new corporate web site.
http://www.createwith.com
Opera 7.54 on modem (44kb)...
- I would have left after 30 seconds (while downloading) if this had
been for real.
- Looks like a
#datatable col.dt_currency { /* Use for columns containing currency values
only. */
text-align: right;
}
text-align for other then text only works on IE, (which it really
shouldn't - it's not text)
setting your margin-right attribute instead is the way to go. Since I
can't see
Laurie Keith wrote:
Hi,
If any of you busy people have a spare 15 minutes, can you give me an honest
evaluation on our new corporate web site.
http://www.createwith.com
I have my own opinions, but I would like to go back to the decision makers
with some independent comments from other
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 17:22:15 +, Paul Connolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 12 Nov 2004, at 12:33, Laurie Keith wrote:
If any of you busy people have a spare 15 minutes, can you give me an
honest evaluation on our new corporate web site.
http://www.createwith.com
Well, my first
We have encountered alignment issues between our target browsers.
The code example below only works within IE, all other browsers
default to standard left alignment.
#datatable col.dt_currency { /* Use for columns containing currency
values only. */
text-align: right;
}
Could be
i wasnt starting saying anything about what you wrote
i was mearly commenting on the opinion that the user posted about dhtml being a
better technology than flash
-- Original Message --
From: Nick Lo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
And here's to the addition of a grammar checker ...
;-)
Lee
Thank you to everyone who has
contributed to the 10,000 posts - hears to the
next 10,000.
Russ and Peter
Just to add my 2c to the weight of opinion, I'm on a broadband
connection and I had to wait too long. I'm glad I'm not on dial-up.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 12:58:32 -0800, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've not read the entire thread, someone has probably mentioned this.
The
Jeroen Visser [ vizi ] wrote:
russ - maxdesign wrote:
OK, we have decided to give the person who did the 10,000th post a prize
(thanks to Core member David McDonald for the idea).
Re: Web Standards Eye Candy: http://www.scottschiller.com/
By Nick Lo - Fri 12 Nov 2004 at 10:33 PM
So, what does Nick
Friday, November 12, 2004, 7:23:40 PM, Ben wrote:
Could be wrong here, or just showing my age, but I recall standards in
1999 saying that underscores were forbidden in class and id names.
I think they were always legal in css as long as they weren't at the
beginning of the name.
However, I'm
Iain Harrison wrote:
Friday, November 12, 2004, 7:23:40 PM, Ben wrote:
Could be wrong here, or just showing my age, but I recall standards in
1999 saying that underscores were forbidden in class and id names.
I think they were always legal in css as long as they weren't at the
beginning of the
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] Web Standards Eye Candy:
document http://www.scottschiller.com/
:
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] Web Standards Eye Candy:
document http://www.scottschiller.com/
:
You might recall that some time ago I offered the
opportunity to starting-designers to have a go at designing a radio station web
site. I said there was no money involved but wed try to pay with
advertising and promotion etc for the designer. Well heres
progress on whats happened.
On 11/12/04 9:21 PM Bennie Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent
this out:
I'm playing around with css scrolling and would like to know if there is
a way to stop the scrolling
list from resetting to the top of the list in IE 6 or just jumping
back up the list in FF.
Unrelated, but after
Rick,
Would you check the site again? I removed the css scrolling,
hope that was the problem.
On 11/13/2004 12:39:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/12/04 9:21 PM Bennie Shepherd sent
this out:
I'm playing around with css scrolling and would like to know if
there is
a way to
Hey Michael,
Looks great!
One thing I would say is that the menu structure may be confusing -
maybe not.
But whenever the menu drops down - eg: for ABOUT.
I didnt think there would or should be differnt links for the two menu
items called about...
it looks like this:
ABOUT
ABOUT
GEEKY STUFF
A side note.
There is a lot of redundant CSS code in your stylesheet - especially
with the links.
Your not using the nature of CSS to its advantage where styles cascade
down...
Bennie Shepherd wrote:
I'm playing around with css scrolling and would like to know if there
is a way to stop the
G'day Chris
Thanks for pointing that menu thing out. Somewhere along the line I've
changed a setting somewhere because that other 'About' is supposed to say
'About the web site'.
And yes, it's me. My show is a specialty bluegrass music show from 2am -
dawn every Friday to about 3000 people
48 matches
Mail list logo
