Hi,
Can you please review this site? Site language
is not English.
http://yuzgen.com/
Thanks in advance,
--
Boke Yuzgen
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free!
http://my.yahoo.com
Hi all!
I'd like you to review my personal site. All pages validate (I think)
except the weblog section, under PMachine engine.
http://www.torresburriel.com
Thanks in advance!
--
/* Daniel Torres Burriel - www.torresburriel.com
/* Web design - Usability consulting - IT Press
/* More info bio:
[UTF-8] it will be stored correctly and rendered as expected, as long
as you remember to put a meta http-equiv=content-type
content=text/html; charset=utf-8 in your page's head.
Actually, what you should be doing is getting the server to send the
right content-type header. Meta elements are
- Nice, clean layout. Align the dotted line
to the top photo or blue rectangle on the
homepage?
- IMO there is a contrast problem, which makes
reading harder. Black instead of gray?
- Too small font on 1600x1200 resolution.
- Your pages jump when I click a link to the
left or right about 5 or
Please change
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=en lang=en
to
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml; xml:lang=tr lang=tr
Have you considered using UTF-8, rather than charset=iso-8859-9 ?
Hope that helps,
RI
Richard Ishida
W3C
contact info:
Idid it first, but my pages won't validate
if I use UTF-8.
--- Richard Ishida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please change
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
xml:lang=en lang=en
to
html xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
xml:lang=tr lang=tr
Have you considered using UTF-8,
Interesting. Which validator are you using?
By rights, it shouldn't validate as is, since XML requires an XML
declaration (ie. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=iso-8859-9?) when not using
utf-8.
Did you note the comment about lang attributes?
RI
Richard Ishida
W3C
contact info:
Hello Julin,
At the W3C we wrote some material to answer your questions. Please see:
http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-char-enc/
and
http://www.w3.org/International/geo/html-tech/tech-character.html (still early
draft!)
Please take a look (and let me know if there is any
Manuel Gonzlez Noriega wrote:
[UTF-8] it will be stored correctly and rendered as expected, as long
as you remember to put a meta http-equiv="content-type"
content="text/html; charset=utf-8" in your page's head.
Actually, what you should be doing is getting the
Hola Manuel, Dejan,
There are pros and cons to using the HTTP header to declare the encoding.
At the W3C we recommend that you always declare encoding inside the
document, whether or not you use the HTTP header. Unlike something like
language declaration, the meta statement for character
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:51:24 -, Richard Ishida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola Manuel, Dejan,
There are pros and cons to using the HTTP header to declare the encoding.
At the W3C we recommend that you always declare encoding inside the
document, whether or not you use the HTTP header.
Very well done Senior Burriel!!! Excellent color scheme, layout, use of
white space and navigation!
My compliments,
Mario S. Cisneros
Hi all,
I'd like you to review my personal site. All pages validate (I think)
except the weblog section, under PMachine engine.
Daniel Torres Burriel wrote:
Hi all!
I'd like you to review my personal site. All pages validate (I think)
except the weblog section, under PMachine engine.
http://www.torresburriel.com
Look out for the top section and those images...
Absolute positioning there makes the page unreadable upon
Here's my situation:
I have 2 divs on a page. top and topprint. In my screen style,
#topprint is set to display:none; #top is styled and appears normal.
In my print sheet, #top is set to display:none; and #topprint
should... well... print.
My problem is with Safari. In Safari, when I print a
Oops. No subject! So sorry!...
Here's my situation:
I have 2 divs on a page. top and topprint. In my screen style,
#topprint is set to display:none; #top is styled and appears normal.
In my print sheet, #top is set to display:none; and #topprint
should... well... print.
My problem is with
I visited your site. I understand it is a work in progress. There are too many comments I could make. I limited myself to those that need most attention first:
1. Why is there a doorway or front page? Such pages make me want to leave - not enter. It is downright unfriendly to expect me to waste
Hi all,
I am putting a few small images into a body of text, and am defining a very
simple declaration for them, according to whether I want them flush left or
right:
e.g. .imgleft{ float : left; margin : 20px;}
Doing this enables me to have the body of the text flowing around the image,
with
enter the ever popular definition list
dl class=image
dtimg.../dt
ddcaption/dd
/dl
This gives you lots of flexibility and keeps it semantic.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: designer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 12:55 PM
To: webstandards group
Subject: [WSG]
Lang attributes:
Fixed.
UTF-8 instead of ISO:
Here's the validator's message:
Sorry, I am unable to validate this document
because on lines 7-9, 11, 79, 84, 86-87, 89-92,
101, 104-107, 114 it contained one or more bytes
that I cannot interpret as utf-8 (in other words,
the bytes found are not
greetings,
e.g. .imgleft{ float : left; margin : 20px;}
Doing this enables me to have the body of the text flowing around the image,
with a nice 20px gap around it. However, I would like to add a small
caption to the image, underneath it. One or more of you will have already
done this I'm
If you are doing a web site and you only have sporadic use of turkish
characters, can't you wrap that text in a div and assign it a language? I
haven't done this before so I'm asking not suggesting. But I thought that I
have seen that as a semantic way to show that there will be languages other
Hi group.
I'm wondering if there's some easy (and free) way to convert text from a
WORD document into clean XHTML that retains the formatting.
Thanks.
--
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
I do not know of a program you can download to work on your computer.
But Dean Allen of Textism fame has this online.
http://textism.com/wordcleaner/
Tim Hill
Computer Associates
Graphic Artist
tel: +612 9937 0792
fax: +612 9937 0546
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
There is a tool in Dreamweaver that can auto generate but I must admit I
have never used it ... a plugin that works in [ free xcellent ]
HTML-Kit - http://www.chami.com/html-kit/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of john
Sent: Tuesday, 23
XStandard will do this on-the-fly. It's a WYSIWYG editor plugin for
CMSs, not a stand-alone product.
http://www.xstandard.com/
Paul Hempsall
Web Developer
Lake Macquarie City Council
Tel: (02) 4921 0713
Fax: (02) 4958 7257
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.lakemac.com.au
Wybrow, Mark wrote:
I'm wondering if there's some easy (and free) way to convert text from a
WORD document into clean XHTML that retains the formatting.
I have been using this from MS
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enFamilyID=209adbee-3fbd-482c-83b0-96fb79b74ded
It
john wrote:
I'm wondering if there's some easy (and free) way to convert text from a
WORD document into clean XHTML that retains the formatting.
If you have Dreamweaver, try using the 'Clean Up Word HTML Tool'. Then
'Convert to XHTML'. Any gunk left over after that is easily cleaned out
using a
I've always found that you still need to eyeball the code because Word
does some very strange things to lists, and headings in particular. Also
a lot of Word documents are not styled properly to begin with (e.g.
bold+font-size, instead of headings) which leads to added complexity to
resolve.
I like the design.
You're getting a couple of CSS validation errors. Also, I think you
should be consistent in the positioning of your main menu. If you
need the left column for sub-navigation inside the site, then use the
horizontal style on the home page as well.
Damian
Hi everyone
Would
Hi Lyn,
I really like the color scheme and navigation! Excellent use of white space.
My only suggestions would be to export what appears to be a backgound
image as a jpg because it's a gradient and if you look close enough you'll
notice that it's producing a banding effect (ripples), which
Once again, the everpopular dl list to the rescue
div id=right
dl
dtJANUARY/dt
dd class=nomeetingNo meeting this month. First meeting for the year will be
Tuesday
15 February./dd
dd
Our speaker will be member and
well-known local amateur botanist
strongPeg Foreman/strong/dd
/div
This would be
I've just a cool firefox extension: Fangs: The Firefox Screen Reader
Emulator at standards-schmandards. The developer has released it so
the they can get feedback and suggestions.
http://www.standards-schmandards.com/index.php?2004/11/22/8-fangs-release-05
Lyn,
It may be worth your taking a look at the site with a reasonably high
resolution set...some of the background images don't work so well (IMO) at
high resolutions (eg 1280 x 1024)
Cheers
Steve
Hi everyone
Would very much appreciate feedback as to any problems or mistakes.
Thank
On 23/11/04 9:19 AM, Wybrow, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a tool in Dreamweaver that can auto generate but I must admit I
have never used it ...
I've found that the Clean Word HTML command in Dreamweaver helps but still
leaves too much junk I don't want.
If you use Mac OS, cut and
Textism have a word cleaner that works quite well:
http://textism.com/wordcleaner/
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:45:30 +1100, Hope A. Stewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/11/04 9:19 AM, Wybrow, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a tool in Dreamweaver that can auto generate but I must admit I
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] Web Standards Eye Candy:
document http://www.scottschiller.com/
:
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] Web Standards Eye Candy:
document http://www.scottschiller.com/
:
john wrote:
I'm wondering if there's some easy (and free) way to convert text from a
WORD document into clean XHTML that retains the formatting.
Another addition: I just remembered that recent versions of Word allow
you to save as HTML, Filtered. This is MS-speak for removing all Office
To whom it may concern,
I joined this web group as part of the research i'm undertaking for my
masters at uts and i've enjoyed
the communication very much. i wish there was someway i could maintain
my connection with this group for future reference
without receiving daily posts, if there is a
Hi all,
This is my first time posting to this forum, so...hi there!
Question: Is it acceptable to use fieldset tag outside of the form element?
The official word from the W3C states:
"The FIELDSET element allows authors to group thematically related controls and labels. Grouping controls makes it
On 23 Nov 2004, at 12:12 PM, Jonathan T. Sage wrote:
If someone on IE5/Mac could shoot me a screenshot of this, I would be
forever grateful. trying to create a IE5/Mac safe layout. Only about
1.5% of my audience base seems to use IE5/Mac, but I know the current
stylesheet makes it a bit unhappy.
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Something to do with the @import syntax?
I don't have Mac IE handy, but Mac IE doesn't like single quotes in the
import, it wants double.
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://holloway.co.nz/
**
The discussion list for
I asked much the same question a little while back and what I got
together was:
First have the doc saved as HTML (Filtered) if it's coming from Word
2003 (earlier versions can get the filtered thingy someone else
mentioned).
Then in my case I wrote a filter for the content management system I
On 23/11/2004, at 2:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every example I've come across so far (and I've seen *a lot* of
examples) has used it within this context. Is it just that grouping
input is the most logical and common used example? Or can it be used
in other contexts?
It's only intended to
Please don't send these requests to the list. To unsubscribe, please go to
http://webstandardsgroup.org/ log in and select Unsubscribe.
There is a password retrieval system on the login screen in case you have
forgotten your password.
If you have trouble or want to comment on the running of the
Hi Brad
Welcome to the list.
According to the HTML 4.01 DTD, Fieldset can live outside a form
block. But it you find yourself putting outside one you're probably
due for a sanity check. Are you using it for semantic purposes or just
for presentational purposes?
If you're using it for semantic
Sorry missed one part of your post:
For example, can it be uses to group a number of related links together?
I'd suggest that Fieldset in this context is meaningless - its not
ArchorSet, its FieldSet - its for form fields. Use a list (ul or ol)
for links.
--
Mark Stanton
Gruden Pty Ltd
Hi guys,
Many thanks for your advice on the subject. I guesskind of got caught up in the part that said"the proper use of this element makes documents more accessible."
I've never actually sat down and properly read through these documents "cover to cover" and so I've started pickinga different
On 22 nov 2004, at 23.00, Ted Drake wrote:
If you are doing a web site and you only have sporadic use of turkish
characters, can't you wrap that text in a div and assign it a
language? I haven't done this before so I'm asking not suggesting. But
I thought that I have seen that as a semantic way
Hi all..
Just saw the following page which I thought looked interesting:
XML Workshop, Brisbane - 14 January 2005
DSTC and the Australian W3C Office is pleased to present an intensive
one day workshop on W3C's XML activities by the international experts
creating XML Recommendations. The
50 matches
Mail list logo
