G'day
I would like to be able to give a different style to *part* of an option field
within a form.
I cannot seem to find any reference to whether the following is possible:
option value=somethingName span(with photo)/span/option
Ideally the words within the span tags would be styled differently
On 28 Mar 2005 at 11:16, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
Hi all
I would like to be able to give a different style to *part* of an option
field within a form.
I cannot seem to find any reference to whether the following is possible:
form
select
option value=somethingName span(with
Hi Juergen
Thanks for your reply. I am not familiar with this specification. Can you point
me to a link or
other info on this?
you would need an own specification
!ELEMENT option (#PCDATA | span)*
then this would work. But not with the official things.
Instead you may use some
Hi Sarah,
ehm ... such a specification
!ELEMENT option (#PCDATA | span)*
would be private - no browser would accept this.
Its possible to use the XHtml1.1-specification (or every other spec)
and add own additional definitions.
Reading your sentence in your first mail
I cannot seem to find
Theres probably a recommended way for creating a drop shadow on your wrapper
divs and i would like to know it.
Are there any good links for tutorials on this topic?
Ive done a drop shadow on an absoulutly positioned layout using divs inside
the wrapper div with negative positioning values.
I hope this helps.
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/cssdrop2/
- Original Message -
From: Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:37 PM
Subject: [WSG] wrapper drop shadows-?
Theres probably a recommended way for creating a drop
wow thanks
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
**
designer wrote:
I've taken your code and added a menu to the top of it, and it works
after a fashion. It doesn't work in IE5.5 and I don't know what to do
with it, esp as I don't fully understand what the IE expression is
doing.
I saw a reference to styling optgroup within an option list on one of the
resources. Try a google search for optgroup css.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sarah Peeke (XERT)
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 5:17 PM
To: WSG
Subject: [WSG]
--this list is my only hope---
I've been rebuilding the html of this page over and over and cant find why
the container div dosnt resize{height} to accomodate all the content in
firefox.
Below is a link to the css and page.
http://mcmonagle.biz/TESTSITE/
please help if you have time
thanks
-for what its worth-
regarding a link from the light reading list sent earlier.
this method for rounding corners without images, which is great-- dosn't
work at all in ie5mac, this isn't mentioned on the page.
Nifty Corners: rounded corners without images:
http://mcmonagle.biz/TESTSITE/
Not contained in Mac Opera 8pr1 either... sorry
--
-
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
You could try a div before the welcome1.gif and close it after back
to top of page. this may work.
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:29:50 +0100, Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--this list is my only hope---
I've been rebuilding the html of this page over and over and cant find why
the container
Kvnmcwebn wrote:
--this list is my only hope---
I've been rebuilding the html of this page over and over and cant find why
the container div dosnt resize{height} to accomodate all the content in
firefox.
Below is a link to the css and page.
http://mcmonagle.biz/TESTSITE/
Hi,
*Technically*
http://www.sql-und-xml.de/unicode-database/miscellaneous-symbols.html
All symbols of version 2.1 are shown in standard-browsers.
Actually, while when I loaded this up (in FireFox), I was happily surprised
that all symbols showed, I noticed that IE6 showed WAY less than half of
them... perhaps
In fact, IE5 (on another computer) renders even less than the few that IE6
displayed; Opera and Netscape 7.2 also performed very poorly... And when I
tried this on another machine here with FireFox, it performed very poorly in
comparison with my machine... so must be affected by what fonts or
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:29:50 +0100, Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--this list is my only hope---
I've been rebuilding the html of this page over and over and cant find why
the container div dosnt resize{height} to accomodate all the content in
firefox.
Below is a link to the css and
Hay, Siggy
Thanks for this email . it is usefull
Best regards
CAI
www.studiocai.com
creative director web designer
- Original Message -
From: Sigurd Magnusson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Style part of form
At 09:43 PM 3/28/2005 +0200, you wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:29:50 +0100, Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--this list is my only hope---
I've been rebuilding the html of this page over and over and cant find why
the container div dosnt resize{height} to accomodate all the content in
Hi Siggy,
thanks for your informations.
Mhmm ... FireFox comes with an built-in font and shows Unicode 2.1
and 3.0, the 'West Syriac Cross' and the East (#x2670 and 2671, both
3.0) are shown in FireFox correctly. The Microsoft Arial Unicode
Font, which is part of Office 2000 and higher, but
thanks for the help and feedback,
Nils and Micheal you have both inadvertantly solved my problem.
I was obliviouse to the fact that firefox wont enclose floats with stated
dimensions, now it makes sense why it dosnt.
But i have to come clean- The height of the content container dosnt even
need to
Hi Ted
I saw a reference to styling optgroup within an option list on one of the
resources. Try a google search for optgroup css.
Thanks for this, but it's not exactly what I was looking for. The optgroup
tag defines a group of
options in a selectable list
Untitled DocumentHi all,
A little off-topic, but after a look around the internet I've come up blank:
I'm trying to lump the popularity of websites into groups based on the total
number of page views per month, and also learn the peak rate of page views
per hour.
E.g. a standard banking website
on 3/28/05 9:38 PM, Veine K Vikberg at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:43 PM 3/28/2005 +0200, you wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:29:50 +0100, Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--this list is my only hope---
I've been rebuilding the html of this page over and over and cant find why
the
Way off topic... Please reply to Siggy off list.
Listdad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sigurd Magnusson
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 8:38 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: SPAM: [WSG] Page views per month, peak rates in
thats a bit over my head but maybe do a google search for internet mapping
or internet geography and tie in a keyword with what you looking for.
not sure
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Dear freinds and colleagues,
How much css -in the head of the html doc-can be used for html email layouts
such as newsletters and the like? I assume that to much if any would be
risky.
-Kevin McMonagle
**
The discussion list for
Kvnmcwebn wrote:
How much css -in the head of the html doc-can be used for html email layouts
such as newsletters and the like? I assume that to much if any would be
risky.
This article may be worth a read
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/cssemail/
--
Patrick H. Lauke
Hi all,
Just wondering if there is a compatibility chart out there for CSS
properties in HTML emails.
We've got charts for the browsers, but what about email clients?
Additionally, what about CSS support in mobile phone browsers?
What browsers are used in which mobile phones?
If anyone has
I can't say as I've ever come across any problems with embedding style
directives in emails, even with quite extensive style guides. The main
consideration seems to be the overall size of the email, and obviously the
larger your style declaration is, the larger the email will be. That said,
the
Richard
http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/04/12/index4a.html and
http://www.htmldog.com/ptg/archives/55.php are useful articles about
mobile phone browsers
a useful post to the WSG from a while back by Kenneth Feldman is quoted
below:
--
Neerav Bhatt
http://www.bhatt.id.au
Web
Let me get it off my chest - I use frames sometimes!
You're not alone, although admittedly I didn't get to make the decision :)
However, what I want to know is, which browsers don't support frames?
As far as I know all of the common browsers support frames, but you're
forgetting that it's
Ok, so this is driving me crazy!
http://cpanz.signify.co.nz/test/national-pod-template.html
I have an unordered list being used for navigation. The bottom item on
the list needs to have a rounded corner. I figure:
- make the last li position: relative
- add a span inside the last li the exact
Your message could not be delivered. The User is out of space. Please try to
send your message again at a later time.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
Well if you put a border on the span you see that the image is in the wrong
place within the span;
Doing background-position: bottom right; within the ul#subnav li.last
span { certainly gets you most the way there; had you done that?
Siggy
- Original Message -
From: Mike Brown [EMAIL
G'day
http://cpanz.signify.co.nz/test/national-pod-template.html
I have an unordered list being used for navigation. The bottom item on
the list needs to have a rounded corner. I figure:
Any ideas? I've spent way too long trying to figure this out, so no
doubt have missed something basic!
Why
Your message could not be delivered. The User is out of space. Please try to
send your message again at a later time.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
Your message could not be delivered. The User is out of space. Please try to
send your message again at a later time.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
Well if you put a border on the span you see that the image is in the
wrong place within the span;
Doing background-position: bottom right; within the ul#subnav li.last
span { certainly gets you most the way there; had you done that?
No! I hadn't thought it necessay
Your message could not be delivered. The User is out of space. Please try to
send your message again at a later time.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some
Alternatively, fast forward to the the future, and use
border-bottom-right-radius :P
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-background-20050216/#the-border-radius
Someone here mentioned that this is already implemented in FireFox with a
different name.
Siggy
- Original Message -
From:
more details
www.blooberry.com/indexdot/css/properties/extensions/nsextensions.htm
http://www.webreference.com/dhtml/column70/
-moz-border-radius,
-moz-border-radius-topleft, -moz-border-radius-topright,
-moz-border-radius-bottomleft, -moz-border-radius-bottomright
Support: Netscape 7+, Mozilla
That entirely depends on what email clients you need to support.
Outlook express, Thunderbird , Outlook 2000 and above, Entourage all have
fairly good html / css support (even some positioning)
Hotmail, yahoo, and most web mails tend to strip head so u need to use
inline styles (D'oh)
Older
43 matches
Mail list logo
