Hi
The first thing you should do, and it's probably a topic for project
decision maker/manager is to ask the question... if we need a skip
link then is the intro useful in the first place?.
If the intro describes the company somehow then serve the homepage and
provide a link to the flash piece on
Hi,
Which is more standards compliant the i-frame of div overflow auto or
scroll. Some issues in version 4 browsers exist with the div method,
but what share of the viewing populace uses any version 4 browser.
What problems are presented by either method in alternative media, such
as handheld
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:29:54 +0100, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is more standards compliant the i-frame of div overflow auto or
scroll. Some issues in version 4 browsers exist with the div method, but
what share of the viewing populace uses any version 4 browser.
Iframe has
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:04:57 +0200, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sarah,
Guess it is confusing to many newbies
Newbie David raises hand...
On this page you write:
IE6 will go into quirks mode if there's anything above the DTD in our
source-code. We may put a comment or whatever up
David Laakso wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:04:57 +0200, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
IE6 will go into quirks mode if there's anything above the
DTD in our source-code. We may put a comment or whatever up there at
the top, but I use an ***xml prolog***.
Yes, there's an error on a
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 07:04:57 +0200, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sarah,
Guess it is confusing to many newbies
Newbie timidly raises hand...
On this http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_1_02_01.htmlpage you write:
IE6 will go into quirks mode if there's anything above the DTD in our
Georg,
I think the decision has more to do with maximising the expectation that
your design will appear the same on any browser than to do with the features
that are available. Also allowing that expectation to continue as standards
and browsers move forward and browsers implement standards more
Hi all,
Don't know if anyone remembers seeing a sort of rip off of CSS Zen
Garden a while back? Someone did a manky looking old school design, not
on the main site.
I'm after the URL if anyone has it.
Cheers :)
**
The discussion list for
http://brucelawson.co.uk/garden
?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
I was wondering if anyone knew of a popular sites to promote semanitc or
compliant (or good in general) websites?
Furthermore, if there was a site or an award that would be considered
quite an achievement or endorsement for your work?
I have submitted several items to www.w3cSites.com, however
This is a great issue and one where I think the WSG can take the lead and
put forward a standard.
To Patrick's comment
'header' is a tricky one and your points about its print origins are very
valid. Perhaps we can take that and still use the print reference by calling
it 'masthead' as this
Rebecca Cox wrote:
Don't know if anyone remembers seeing a sort of rip off of CSS Zen
Garden a while back? Someone did a manky looking old school design, not
on the main site.
Off topic, but I remember Dave Shea sending me a chuckling reply when I
pointed him to my own - admittedly super simple
http://www.webstandardsawards.com/ Is one site that showcases good design
and standards.
http://www.weeklystandards.com/ This was a great site, and it looks like it
is about to get going again.
There is two. Not really sure about all of the other generic Award sites,
seems like you get awards
Sigurd Magnusson wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knew of a popular sites to promote semanitc
or compliant (or good in general) websites?
Guild of Accessible Web Designers have a 'Site of the Month' award,
voting is by members only, you can nominate a site at
2005/4/18, Richard Czeiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe we can formalise this list so that it becomes a
'see-if-any-of-these-are-relevant-first' list of values that people can use.
If what they need is not on the list then they can make up their own...
I agree this point. I think it should be
Kazuhito Kidachi wrote:
I agree this point. I think it should be useful especially for
beginners, and it may prevent them from using presentational names.
The list could be a kind of good dictionary, I guess.
But, every site has its own name space controlled by its original
naming rule. The list
hi there,
I'm wondering if a site would be more accessible if the flash intro (never
mind how it's a bad idea to have a flash intro!) skipped automatically if
the viewer had seen the intro before. I'm also wondering if I could detect
browser for the sight impaired and skip the intro then
I'm working on this website for a charitable organisation:
http://www.lienhoatemple.org.au/vi/index.html
and I don't know what it looks like to you, but in my browser
(FireFox 1.0 Mac) the Vietnamese characters which should be bold or
italic are coming out as plain.
It's only the
Richard,
you wrote:
I think the decision has more to do with maximising the expectation
that your design will appear the same on any browser than to do with
the features that are available. Also allowing that expectation to
continue as standards and browsers move forward and browsers
implement
Oh Damn, I guess I will have to make it visible again. I have only tested
it on FF, IE6 and IE5.
FYI, on the first tab Opera 8 beta 3 jumps to the name input at the bottom.
h
--
--- http://www.200ok.com.au/
--- The future has arrived; it's just not
--- evenly distributed. - William Gibson
Hi
I have a page in the site I am working on
(http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/wip/sbi240/module3/agriculture.html) that
won't validate because of an external link I have to the Australian
Consumers' Association -
http://www.choice.com.au/defaultView.aspx?id=102314catId=100165
I'm getting these sorts
This needs to be rewritten as:
http://www.choice.com.au/defaultView.aspx?id=102314amp;catId=100165
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have a page in the site I am working on
(http://learnline.cdu.edu.au/wip/sbi240/module3/agriculture.html) that
won't validate because of an external link I have to the
http://www.choice.com.au/defaultView.aspx?id=102314catId=100165
I'm getting these sorts of errors
Line 298, column 70: cannot generate system identifier for general entity
catId
You need to replace the character in the URL with amp;. The
short version of why this is a problem is in HTML,
On 18 Apr 2005, at 11:54 am, John Horner wrote:
I'm working on this website for a charitable organisation:
http://www.lienhoatemple.org.au/vi/index.html
and I don't know what it looks like to you, but in my browser (FireFox
1.0 Mac) the Vietnamese characters which should be bold or italic
On 4/18/05, Rebecca Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Don't know if anyone remembers seeing a sort of rip off of CSS Zen
Garden a while back? Someone did a manky looking old school design, not
on the main site.
I'm after the URL if anyone has it.
Thanks to everyone who's responded so far. This in particular from
Philippe seems to have fixed the immediate problem:
For both FF and Safari, it might help if you specify 'Lucida Grande'
as the first font-family (sans-serif). I'm not aware of any trick
for sans-serif. And using shorthand
26 matches
Mail list logo
