Lea de Groot wrote:
Last night's Brisbane meeting was a roaring success.
Our new venue at the Library was great, with the only downside being no
internet connection. It seems Brisbane's standard is the leading edge
- an interstate visitor tells us we are far ahead of Melbourne in
catering.
On 4/16/05, Steven Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The other most noticable thing off the bat was the drop down menu and top
nav disappears entirely with JavaScript disabled.
Companies often don't care about accessibility... regardless of
whether they should or not (obviously we all think they
Oh - my - insert deity here.
http://www.markme.com/mesh/archives/007504.cfm
http://www.markme.com/mesh/archives/007504.cfm
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/invrelations/adobeandmacromedia.html
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/invrelations/adobeandmacromedia.html
Where do things go from
From: Brendan Smith
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/invrelations/adobeandmacromedia.html
Holy smokes...had to double check the date to make sure it wasn't 1st April.
Where do things go from here for standards aware tools?
They'd be fools to reverse the positive steps in that direction made
Mind boggling, to say the least.
Maybe the next big graphic design program will be Fireshop, or Photoworks?
--
Johnno Shadbolt
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED], www.code215.com
It is easy to make a website that any computer likes.
It is hard to make a website that any user likes.
InfoForce Services (Angus MacKinnon) wrote:
This brings up a question. How effective are Skip navigation links? I
have heard that half the people do not understand what skip
navigation links are. I design web sites to get to the main content
or with very few links until the main content.
I'm in
On 4/18/05, Johnno Shadbolt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mind boggling, to say the least.
Maybe the next big graphic design program will be Fireshop, or Photoworks?
Wow. Like Patrick, I had to check that it wasn't a belated April Fools thing.
Holy cow. I totally didn't see that one coming.
No, that's not it. Now I'm totally dying because I can't find it.
Some guy had figured out, and I believe had tested a way to
audtomatically keep column heights at equal heights to each other. No
javascript and it didn't even appear to be a hack.
He made some comment that he stared at his
pixeldiva
I'll be happy so long as they don't ditch Fireworks entirely. I like
Fireworks and I like Photoshop, but for entirely different things.
If I can hazard a prediction, they'll obviously keep Photoshop and
merge the functionality of Fireworks into ImageReady.
Hopefully they'll drop
Oh, and sorry...this is fairly off topic. Apologies...
Patrick
Yes I was thinking the same. Very interesting news with on-topic
repercussions down the track but not really a valid discussion point here
and now. However, I have set up a page in the WSG Blog for this
discussion...
Vaska.Wsg wrote:
A short while ago somebody wrote an article about achieving 100% height
divs when using multiple columns. Their solution was something really
simple but for the life of me I can't remember the trick - it was some
kind of one line rule...height: ???. But I'm not sure.
You
Hi, Siggy
I know this site : http://cssvault.com/. It is a very good collection
of GOOD CSS layout and design.
Cheers
Angela
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la
part de Sigurd Magnusson
Envoyé : lundi 18 avril 2005
One of the recent suggestions on balancing columns without javascript
was to put a tiny graphic in the columns set at the appropriate repeat.
From Vaska.WSG, we have:
Digging around in there I don't think I see the article I was
originally looking for, but this seems to be the same thing
Hello Siggy,
I know about these 2 other websites:
http://www.webstandardsawards.com/
http://www.stylegala.com/
Hugues Brunelle
Concepteur graphique
//
ECHO tridimension
2139 rue Masson
Montréal QC H2H 1A8
1-(514)5211360
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helen Court | Formandsubstance wrote:
One of the recent suggestions on balancing columns without javascript
was to put a tiny graphic in the columns set at the appropriate repeat.
Well, I asked on here about something I was working on, early on
Saturday morning (see
Some of my 100% column bookmarks:
http://www.pixy.cz/blogg/clanky/css-3col-layout/
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/challenge/3cols/?add=right
http://www.redmelon.net/tstme/3cols2/
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=AnyColumnLongest
hope you find something there :)
cheers
kemie
Actually i don't know any specific pitfalls to build web site for cell
phone, in this case i build a specific CSS that disable image and
positioning attribute. I also specify the text size in Em (that wold
be a reasonable mannet to adapt text to screen size). Surely, now
cell-phone are interesting
Hello
Sigurd,Web awards, you said?Some are the kind you're looking
for, promoting to a certain extent,standards compliance and
accessibility.That may require you some prospection, Google search
for "awards for sites"should also provide you some links... the first one is
my own.You can also
Hi Helen,
In the link for the consumer's association change the ampersand to the
html entity for ampersand (amp;) and try validation again. The
validator is trying to identify a system identifier 'catId...' and
because it hasn't been terminated with a semicolon, it generates all
those other
HTMLTidy is the only useful piece of software I've found for web page
development, and I use it to clean up my pages and get proper encoding
of my Norwenglish lines of text into numeric entities (UTF-8) where
needed.
What characters needs encoding into numeric entities when using UTF-8?
I try to
Just curious what tidy parameters you are using. I have some European (Polish,
Czech, Russian)
language sites I'm working on and would prefer to convert the UTF-8 to some
numeric equal for
certain high-range letters.
Paul
--- Anders Nawroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HTMLTidy is the only
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:10:44 +0100, Paul Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just curious what tidy parameters you are using. I have some European
(Polish, Czech, Russian) language sites I'm working on and would prefer
to convert the UTF-8 to some numeric equal for certain high-range
letters.
I have [...] Czech, [...] sites I'm working on and would prefer to convert
the UTF-8 to some numeric equal for certain high-range letters.
Well, I'd suggest you not to do this, as nobody here would do it this
way :) However it'd make the maintenance easier for non-CZ/PL person.
--
Jan Brasna
Anders Nawroth wrote:
What characters needs encoding into numeric entities when using
UTF-8?
I try to avoid entities with exception for '
Look for some answers here:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/Unicode.html
...so I don't have to give incomplete answers about something I'm not an
Hi,
The following: ((http://www.ckimedia.com/c/print.css)) works when
tested locally in firefox 1.0 on mac os 10.2.8, but when uploaded to
the server it fails. What did I goof?
CK
__
Knowing is not enough, you must apply;
willing is not enough, you must do.
You say try test extensively... but from what I've seen there is SO much
variation between rendering on different cell phone and PDA's. And I don't
know about the rest of the world, but in NZ it is VERY expensive to use the
browsing on the cell phone.
Is there a web site or an accurate way of
Hi,
Solved it, a typo.
On Monday, April 18, 2005, at 02:36 PM, Chris Kennon wrote:
Hi,
The following: ((http://www.ckimedia.com/c/print.css)) works when
tested locally in firefox 1.0 on mac os 10.2.8, but when uploaded to
the server it fails. What did I goof?
CK
Dunno if you already fixed this but I would try:
Change media for print.css to screen see if its still no show.
Try not using @import for it?
Or possibly, ref the @import css files from root - eg /c/print.css, not
c/print.css
Cheers :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyone ever found a way to do this? (besides with scripting that is)
Cheers :)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
Hi all
I'm converting a ton of pages and I came across a textarea with
wrap=virtual. Can I move this to the style sheet? When I read the HTML
description, it wraps the text in the textarea box but sends it to the
server in one line, it sounded like more of a behavior than a style.
It seems to be
I think its because html {width: 100%} is not the
right way of doing it... have you tried body {width:
100%}? This works fine with my work.
Cheers
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
Rachel Radford wrote:
Is there a web site or an accurate way of 'testing' websites on PDA's
and cell phones if you don't have access to them?
Not really. Too many non-standards around...
There is a real standard: 'media handheld', but support for it is
sketchy to non-existent for most
This is the second time I am coming across the IE three pixel bug, but this
time it really got me:
http://www.addictivemedia.com.au/clients/gta/home.html
Please ignore the green line that shows up in IE (didn't get around to
dealing with that one yet). The three pixel bug shows itself in IE on
First, take a look here in Firefox or Netscape: http://www.x7m.us/_clients/danielik/dev/testing/index.htm
Perfect. both floats line up vertically to the top nav bar as
desired.
Now, take a look in IE6.
Somehow, some right-padding or right-margin has crept into the
right side of the red
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
This is the second time I am coming across the IE three pixel bug, but this
time it really got me:
http://www.addictivemedia.com.au/clients/gta/home.html
Andreas
not sure if this will fix it, but try ending the hack with a comment
eg
style
/*
-Original Message-
From: Mike Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 19 April 2005 1:44 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] IE three pixel bug has beaten me
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
This is the second time I am coming across the IE three
Cole Kuryakin - x7m schrieb:
http://www.x7m.us/_clients/danielik/dev/testing/index.htm
Somehow, some right-padding or right-margin has crept into the right side of the red outlined box in IE.
#sideBar { margin: 25px 14px 25px 15px; padding: 0pt; width: 140px;
float: right;
display: inline; /*
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
This is the second time I am coming across the IE three pixel bug,
but this time it really got me:
Only temporarily...
http://www.addictivemedia.com.au/clients/gta/home2.html
Try killing a float-bug with a float:
#home_right {margin: 0; float: left;}
...
Fixed. Thanks so much!
Will review positioniseverything site for better understanding of this
issue - particularly if it only pertains to floats.
Thanks again Ingo.
Cole
- Original Message -
From: Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005
39 matches
Mail list logo
