If you don't mind me asking, what are your reasons for making this decision?
Purely based on font size. ... and in response to this:
just because you use higher resolutions doesn't mean you have smaller text...
... *nod* I know. I have messed with that several times. It all ends
up looking most
I appologize if this is off topic. The validator does not like float:
center;. What is the correct way to center an image? IE6 shows a centered
Scottish flag which I would like and Firefox 1.5 does not.
HTML: http://infoforce-services.com/personal/mackinnon_namehistory.php
CSS:
Angus at InfoForce Services wrote:
I appologize if this is off topic. The validator does not like float:
center;.
That's because the value is undefined for the 'float' property.
What is the correct way to center an image? IE6 shows a
centered Scottish flag which I would like and Firefox 1.5
Hi folks,
I hereby publicly declare that my days of complaining to website
authors that I cannot view their site at 800x600, and then opening my
big mouth about other dubious issues I notice on their site, are now
over.
I dropped a line to my ISP (ostensibly to enquire about my account)
and
On 27/02/2006, at 1:16 PM, SunUp wrote:
I will now be a good little backyard hobbyist web-designer as they
called me (actually, it's my day job too), and never mention standards
again.
completely gobstopped
These guys are professional service providers?
If the tone of the message was as bad
SunUp wrote:
When I could not find what I was looking for I was told: I recommend
that this issue in this case has not been a usability issue but
instead has been a logic issue on the clients side, and I would
recommend that you re-attend year 10-12 english classes in order to
know this in
On 06/02/26 21:36 SunUp apparently typed:
Lachlan Hunt wrote Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:34:29 -0800:
If you don't mind me asking, what are your reasons for making this decision?
Purely based on font size. ... and in response to this:
Steve Olive Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:20:03 -0800 wrote:
...just
On 2/26/06, SunUp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I hereby publicly declare that my days of complaining to website
authors that I cannot view their site at 800x600, and then opening my
big mouth about other dubious issues I notice on their site, are now
over.
Ah, but when annoying little
Hi there
http://www.ilisys.com.au/
Get a new ISP dudedon't just stand there and break
Ray
At 02:16 PM 27/02/2006, you wrote:
Hi folks,
I hereby publicly declare that my days of complaining to website
authors that I cannot view their site at 800x600, and then opening
my
big mouth about
Hi,
I hereby publicly declare that my days of complaining to website
authors that I cannot view their site at 800x600, and then opening my
big mouth about other dubious issues I notice on their site, are now
over.
[snip]
I'm astonished at the tone - although not especially surprised by the
Christian Montoya wrote:
On 2/26/06, SunUp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I hereby publicly declare that my days of complaining to website
authors that I cannot view their site at 800x600, and then opening my
big mouth about other dubious issues I notice on their site, are now
over.
I dropped a line to my ISP (ostensibly to enquire about my account)
and mentioned I could not find certain information on their website
(and suggested it might be a usability issue), that the horizontal
scrolling was giving me RSI (joke), commented on their massive use of
javascript in the
Well at least they're not using tables for layout :-)
On 27/02/06, SunUp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I hereby publicly declare that my days of complaining to website
authors that I cannot view their site at 800x600, and then opening my
big mouth about other dubious issues I notice on
I have been courting disaster with a potential client on these points exactly.
I am risking losing a potentially valuable contract with my
standardista (and I am pretty moderate) standpoint. Heck, I'd just
like to get their sites to validate, but they are old-skool asp guys
who learned all there
I think you have come across a key lesson for the standards community:
techies know about standards, they are not ignorant, they just have
their own reasons (however lame) for not following them.
...which is why they can be a tough group to pitch to. They can be far
more set in their ways than
On 27/02/2006, at 4:08 PM, Ben Buchanan wrote:
Not to mention the fact that the people who implemented those
bohemoths can't always separate standards advice from personal
vilification - no matter how polite, rational, independently
verfiable...
I think its important to understand that, for
Lea de Groot wrote:
On 27/02/2006, at 4:08 PM, Ben Buchanan wrote:
Not to mention the fact that the people who implemented those
bohemoths can't always separate standards advice from personal
vilification - no matter how polite, rational, independently
verfiable...
I think its important
SunUp wrote:
Hi folks,
My own fault, I asked for it, obviously.
I will now be a good little backyard hobbyist web-designer as they
called me (actually, it's my day job too), and never mention
standards
again.
I don't think you need to go back to 10th grade, but - for your own
sake - you
Any business owner with half a brain would march that person straight out
the door.
Not only would I forward the offending email to management with a polite
assurance that I had not YET made the companies name public, but I would
follow it up with all the messages of outrage and disgust that
19 matches
Mail list logo
