On Mar 13, 2006, at 5:14 PM, John Wells wrote:
Can we get a summary of this CAPS lesson? Are we saying that:
- ONLY when serving XHTML as application/xhtml+xml, stylesheet
selectors must be all lowercase.
?
Some browsers are sensitive to case when XHTML is served as text/
html. iCab
On Mar 12, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
A solution is to move your image of screen for screen display (like
img {position:absolute; left: -1px}) instead of using
{display:none}.
I once posted an article about this:
http://emps.l-c-n.com/articles/52/print-media-oddity
Hi all,
I'm hoping to get some feedback from people regarding a solution to a
usability issue. I work for a large organisation and we have very
large/detailed processing required. Because the applications we develop are
very detailed and change dynamically depending upon the current input,
Designer wrote:
Incidentally, I would be interested in any browsers you know which won't
support application/xhtml+xml, apart from IE of course.
http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/results
--
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
Hi Nathan,
First of all I don't see any reason why the Help icons need to be in the tab
order. You could set a more appropriate tab order in the markup that skips the
Help icons, whilst still providing other methods of accessing the help text.
For example, you could use a server-side scripting
Hello,
Can anyone please recommend a standards compliant slideshow script
that uses a list of images within the HTML markup to dynamically
create the show.
Thanks
Daz
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Hi,
Maybe you could take a look at HTML Sildy
(www.w3.org/2005/03/slideshow.html )?
-Ben
Hello,
Can anyone please recommend a standards compliant slideshow script that
uses a list of images within the HTML markup to dynamically
create the show.
Thanks
Daz
Keep in mind too, that most tabbers are familiar with shift + tab as
well for navigating backwards.
Should we assume that keyboard navigators can competently do this, or is
that giving too much of an assumption?
Joseph R. B. Taylor
Sites by Joe, LLC
http://sitesbyjoe.com
(609)335-3076
[EMAIL
Can anyone please recommend a standards compliant slideshow script that
uses a list of images within the HTML markup to dynamically
create the show.
http://slayeroffice.com/code/imageCrossFade/xfade2.html
--
DonkeyMagic: Website design development
http://www.donkeymagic.co.uk
Thats cool, thanks all, although I think I may have miss explained
myself - will simplify with links :)
Basically I am trying to setup pagination - here are the pages:
http://ta.rt-ms.net/teamengine/property.html
http://ta.rt-ms.net/teamengine/assets/js/media.js
And is the markup:
div
Return Receipt
Your Re:[WSG] Usability issue with form help
document:
Maybe I'm missing your point, but using the tabindex attribute does not
solve your problem?, You can set the tabindex to cycle trough the
inputs and then continue with the help links. It is a totally
accessible method; a bit uncomfortable (to have to pass through all the
input fields to get to the
Thanks for your replies to date. To give you a deeper understanding of the
situation:
- despite quite skilled users, double tabbing hundreds and hundreds of times
a day is seen as a efficiency issue too (x 5days x 45weeks)
- the sample form
Darren West wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone please recommend a standards compliant slideshow script
that uses a list of images within the HTML markup to dynamically
create the show.
Slightly self-promoting but try http://scooch.gr0w.com . The current
demo is woefully out of date already with a lot
Designer wrote:
Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Designer wrote:
Incidentally, I would be interested in any browsers you know which won't
support application/xhtml+xml, apart from IE of course.
http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/media-types/results
Thanks, Lachlan. I studied the list, and the
I have a question. I am using Navstudio for menus and I am having a
problem with it overflowing and making me have a scroll at the bottom. Can
anyone take a look and see what my problem might be. I'll go ahead and say
it now, but it is not up to standards, it is still in the beginning.
Well it's a little hard to explain but I'll try. Inside
this tag div id="menu" I have a couple of Nav Studio
Menus. It is making my page have an unnecessaryhorizontal scroll bar
at the bottom. I was hoping someone with fresh eyes could take a look and
see if they spot the reason for this.
On 06/03/13 21:35 Paula Petrik apparently typed:
When I read the W3C specs (not the most riveting exercise on the
planet), it seems that the developers emphasize absolute positioning.
For example, they describe using floats to float small bits of text or
images. It seems, however, that floats
The main reason I dont use absolute positioning for all my layout is
that most of the sites I build require footers at the base of the page
content.
With every page of differing content length the only way to achieve
this is to float and then clear for the footer.
Thats just me. There are wiser
Paula Petrik wrote:
When I read the W3C specs (not the most riveting exercise on the
planet), it seems that the developers emphasize absolute positioning.
For example, they describe using floats to float small bits of text or
images. It seems, however, that floats have become the order of the
Leaving aside arguments about whether or not tag clouds are the new
mullets (http://www.zeldman.com/daily/0405d.shtml), I've been
pondering how to make one that is accessible, given the questionable
accessibility of most of the ones out there.
Tag clouds suffer from a number of problems, the
On Mar 14, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Paula Petrik wrote:
When I read the W3C specs (not the most riveting exercise on the
planet), it seems that the developers emphasize absolute
positioning. For example, they describe using floats to float small
bits of text or images. It seems, however, that
Here's a potentially naive response ... does it matter?
As long as the (x)html is semantically marked up, does the rationale behind
your css code make a difference (taking into account the fact that it should
look the same on all browsers)?
The ONLY function of css is the control of the
As an idea, why not make the label for each field a link, which will provide contextual help on that item/field?I'd do some user testing to make sure it works, but it makes sense to me that following such a link would lead to information about that field. The advantage of this would be it reduces
Felix Todd,
Felix, nice to know that I'm in good company. Todd and Phillipe, I
think that the footer business is the sticking point. But what is
sacred about a footer? What information goes into a footer that could
not go elsewhere? This has me puzzled. In the table days, the most
On 3/13/06, Jude Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leaving aside arguments about whether or not tag clouds are the new
mullets (http://www.zeldman.com/daily/0405d.shtml), I've been
pondering how to make one that is accessible, given the questionable
accessibility of most of the ones out there.
Paula Petrik wrote:
When I read the W3C specs (not the most riveting exercise on the
planet), it seems that the developers emphasize absolute
positioning.
For example, they describe using floats to float small bits of text
or images. It seems, however, that floats have become the order of
the
Hi everyone.
Ive been struggling with some z-indexed, positioned
elements that are getting obscured by content further down the page in IE6.
After doing a bit of research, I came across these two sites:
http://www.aplus.co.yu/css/z-pos/index.php
This may sound silly but what about the tabindex attribute?
AFAIK it's still part of the standard and should do what you're after...
R :o)
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I'm well into the development of my Council's new website (replacing the
current inaccessible, tag soup version). A discussion point has been
raised with our Content Editors regarding Introduction pages for each
main section of the site.
What's the general concensus of the direction Introduction
Paul Hempsall:
What's the general concensus of the direction Introduction pages should
take. I've always been concerned that reiterating the section
navigation
via a barrage of links would be a confusing and disorienting method.
quite the opposite: a barrage of links with a supporting
This message has been returned to you because I will be on leave from Wed
15/3/2006 to Friday 17/3/2006. During my absence, please contact Judy Hageman
on 72224
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
[snip- tag clouds]
Thoughts? Mild agreement? Sly refutations?
For a simple tag cloud I'm not sure how a table would work - the cloud
isn't really tabular, in the way I would describe tabular. If a
second rating was applied; eg. popularity + freshness (ie. how many
times does the tag appear, and
This message has been returned to you because I will be on leave from Wed
15/3/2006 to Friday 17/3/2006. During my absence, please contact Judy Hageman
on 72224
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
34 matches
Mail list logo
