Hi,
Web 2.0 is basically what Web 1.0 was meant to be, before it was hijacked
by commerce, i.e. collaborative information sharing, social networking,
etc.
The difference is that nowadays we have Web technologies which make this
much easier and more extensive, e.g. Wikipedia and other wikis,
that is by far the most profound statement ive heard regarding web 2.0
totally spot on. funny how simple things become when you look at it that
way...
love your work.
On 2/13/08, Stuart Foulstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Web 2.0 is basically what Web 1.0 was meant to be, before it was
I suggest a definition to web 2.0:
The lysergic side of Internet.
Why?
As Timothy Leary, he defined a thought.
As Beatles on Seargent Peppers
As Bush on War against terror
Is impossible to describe.
Genau Jr
Midiaweb Internet
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Could somebody enlighten me as to what any of these irrelevant ramblings
about a marketing buzzphrase have to do with Web Standards?
NickFitz in about time to unsubscribe from this list if it's going to
degenerate into pretentious drivel mode...
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
Nicely said.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Nick Fitzsimons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:38:14
To:wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] hello
Could somebody enlighten me as to what any of these irrelevant ramblings
about a marketing
Very ironic.
On Wed, February 13, 2008 12:38 pm, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
...
NickFitz in about time to unsubscribe from this list if it's going to
degenerate into pretentious drivel mode...
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
touch.
Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Very ironic.
On Wed, February 13, 2008 12:38 pm, Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
...
NickFitz in "about time to unsubscribe from this list if it's going to
degenerate into pretentious drivel" mode...
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
Hi Naveen
Options are, as discussed, fieldsets and labels to assist with positioning.
There is nothing illegal about using form elements in a table - some see it
as the widget labels being in the th and the actual widgets being in
the td. For a quick, single fieldset form, it's a useful layout
OK enough. Lets stay on topic before we irritate the masses!
Russ
List-get-back-on-topic-person
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
James Ellis wrote:
and remember that Wine is an emulation layer, it may not give the same
results as virtualising Windows (which is a standard Windows install). It
depends on how good the emulation is.
For instance, before using virtualisation to test IE in XP, I was using Wine
and
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrew WC Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Feb 13, 2008 11:06 PM
Subject: navaigation list rendered bad in ie
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Hi WSG,
I'm currently working on a web-site and I've bumped my head on IE rendering
things in its own weird way.
On Behalf Of Andrew WC Brown
Here's an image to the problem
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/5567/iefirefoxlistcb1.jpg
Here's a link to the page
http://dutchakscrap.com/about.html
Hi Andrew,
Try this:
div.navigation a {zoom:1;}
As a side note, I don't see a need for that DIV, you could
This is a much better and interesting description of web 2.0.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmP4nk0EOE
if less technical...
Joe
On Feb 12 2008, at 13:14, russ - maxdesign wrote:
Have a read of these for the official definitions or descriptions
of web 2.0:
13 matches
Mail list logo
