Perhaps you could try nested lists.
On Fri, March 21, 2008 1:56 am, Elizabeth Spiegel wrote:
Hi all
I'm developing a site for a non-profit organisation and one page is their
constitution. I'm trying to get the clauses to appear with a hanging
indent
as they currently do in the word
Elizabeth
I believe the solution Mike came up with to be a sound one. However maybe
you should step back and think why this should be a web page at all. You
are facing the great problem of trying to make the screen look like print.
Something which drives most of us up the wall at some point.
I am about to start coding for a new site, and client asked me to make
sure my code will work for IE8, meaning when IE 8 comes out, she
doesn't need to pay me extra to fix any problem that may occur in IE
8. Client is from a web media company, though I understand her
concerns and that she
tee wrote:
I am about to start coding for a new site, and client asked me to
make sure my code will work for IE8, meaning when IE 8 comes out, she
doesn't need to pay me extra to fix any problem that may occur in IE
8.Client is from a web media company, though I understand her
concerns and
On 20 Mar 2008, at 19:34, Keryx Web wrote:
tee skrev:
I thought fieldset (with legend) are used only for form elements,
I am curious why you would used it in your right column's content.
A. It is valid. You may use it according to the DTD.
Many things are valid. The DTD is not
David Dorward skrev:
From the spec:
The FIELDSET element allows authors to group thematically related
controls and labels. ---
As I said, I am no minimalist. And yes, I have read the spec. It does
not forbid me to use fieldsets outside of forms. Specs use the language
of MAY NOT, SHOULD,
The document could be made available for download as a PDF and also RTF (for
accessibility purposes).
Joe Clark pulled me up on this, and after checking into it, it is
something of a myth that RTF is good for accessibility. RTF has no
structure and (if I remember correctly) no means of
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:52 AM, tee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last time with IE 7, there was no problem and none of the sites I
coded for her break when IE 7 came out. I think this version
targeting thing really got people worry.
Um, could you just not add the meta tag saying 'treat as
Hello Rob,
facing the great problem of trying to make
the screen look like print.
Good point. I had that issue with a site I recently made. The client wanted
every entry to look like it did in print. For example, the print version
used uppercase headings. The client was adding this content
Thanks for your email. I'm currently out of the office and will be returning on
Wednesday 26 March 2008.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Mike Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://webstock.org.nz/past/recordings.php
Enjoy!
Mike
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Also Spracht Thierry Koblentz:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Mike Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://webstock.org.nz/past/recordings.php
Enjoy!
Could anyone download these files?
I couldn't download them either
Overall access to the site seems slow. I figured I would try copying
I need to wrap phone numbers, what's the best way to go for this?
[div class=phones]
[span class=tel][span class=typeHome[/span] +1.415.555.1212[/span]
[span class=tel][span class=typePager[/span] +1.415.555.1212[/span]
[span class=tel][span class=typeOffice[/span] +1.415.555.1212[/span]
[/div]
hi,the second one seems more strict to me.
i think our microformats-philosophy is to make it as readable by bots as
possible.
IMHO:
[span class=type]Office[/span][span class=value] +1.415.555.1212[/span]
is simpler to parse than
[span class=tel][span class=typeOffice[/span] +1.415.555.1212[/span]
Nor I.
--
E. Michael Brandt
www.divahtml.com
www.divahtml.com/products/scripts_dreamweaver_extensions.php
Standards-compliant scripts and Dreamweaver Extensions
www.valleywebdesigns.com/vwd_Vdw.asp
JustSo PictureWindow
JustSo PhotoAlbum, et alia
--
the second one seems more strict to me.
i think our microformats-philosophy is to make it as readable by bots as
possible.
IMHO:
[span class=type]Office[/span][span class=value]
+1.415.555.1212[/span]
is simpler to parse than
[span class=tel][span class=typeOffice[/span]
Return Receipt
Your RE: [WSG] Webstock recordings now available
document:
Return Receipt
Your RE: [WSG] Webstock recordings now available
document:
I'd also add that the 'Web 2.0' as a word / phrase and phenomena is a
way of describing the internet and new design concepts to those who make
decisions on it but don't really have any idea about it.
e.g. Marketing Managers whom have developers and designers telling them
we need to do this
19 matches
Mail list logo
