On 3/1/06, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Slightly peeved that Microsoft's patent violation ages ago means that
we [may] now have to make changes en-mass to keep websites
functioning, and extend browser discrepancies in implementations of
certain features even further than at
Hi Everyone,
I just noticed Opera have opened the Opera Labs page and they now have
Opera 9 Preview 2 available for testing. The site has minimal content
at the moment (after all it just opened) but there is a short speil on
Opera supported web standards and the direction they are heading in:
It truly is frustrating when FAQ pages hide everything with
invisible DIVs. As already mentioned it makes Ctrl-F useless (which
I personally find very annoying), and it also makes me click a whole
bunch of useless + symbols if I want to read more than one question on
the page.
On 1/30/06, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still keen to hear anyone's suggestions as to the Firefox 1.0.x render
problem... :)
Josh
Hi Josh,
While on the topic of rendering bugs I just thought I would mention
that in Opera 9 beta there is some funky stuff happening with the
On 1/19/06, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it? I'm using AHAH (H = HTML, as opposed to XML) to dynamically
retrieve some content and innerHTML seems infinitely more sensible:
...
innerHTML doesn't work with XHTML, etc,. I know... and it's not a DOM
method... but do people consider
On 1/20/06, heretic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just discovered the 'small screen rendering' tool in Firefox (web
developer toolbar). Am I right in thinking this is an attempt to show
what a site looks like on a mobile device or similar? Is it a good
guide? etc.
That's the theory,
On 1/15/06, Sarah Peeke (XERT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW I have found this article:
http://jeffcroft.com/blog/archives/2004/10/styling_fieldset_and_legend.
php which talks about an IE underscore hack using:
fieldset{position:relative} legend{position:relative;_top:-0.5em}
Does anyone
On 1/14/06, Helmut Granda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the tips, unfortunately no Server Side technology can be used,
just static HTML files.
If the pages must be static then you only have two options that I can
think of...
1) Use a current class (or id) on the navigation element that
On 1/10/06, Seona Bellamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone who is running a larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a
look and tell me if the layout is holding up?
Even better, can someone explain to me what the code in this conditional
comment is doing in the first place? According
On 1/10/06, Justin Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'm seeing in IE6 is a fixed width layout that is centered at
resolutions above 1024x768. I'm also seeing a horizontal scrollbar on
my second monitor at 1024x768 (maximised), so it seems the width might
need to be 1 or 2 pixels less
I have noticed Firefox behaving a little differently to IE when using
floated elements inside a fieldset. I think you may need a clearing
div (or other element if you wish) *inside* the fieldset below the
definition list, rather than trying to put the clearing on the
'buttons' div which is outside
IE7 will be far from a disappointment. Sure Beta 1 doesn't seem to
give us anything much new and the UI is a bit topsy-turvey but I think
it's mostly due to the fact that it has come straight out of Longhorn
(Vista).
From the IMPRESSIVE list of fixes and newly supported features posted
on the IE
On 7/15/05, wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont think XAML needs to be hosted inside IE?
No it doesn't need to be. I said You will be able to, not you must :)
People need to take a step back here and stop the off topic rants. Go
do some light reading or something:
On 7/15/05, David Pietersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We all do, really. I am at home, and don't have the research here, but
current statistics show that 97.4% of all devices accessing web content are
running on Windows. Every one of these machines has IE on it. Really, are
we mad to
You're also missing a semi-colon after San Serif =)
- carter
On 6/26/05, Tatham Oddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tee,You've got the wrong selector. Use:strong{ font: 1em bold #369 Arial, San Serif
text-transform: uppercase; text-decoration: none;}Or consult the
i thinkReset buttons can have their merits depending on the context of their use. think of an application where a user is Editing data in a form, not starting with a blank form!
- the user is wanting tochange 2 fields in a customer record, an address and a phone number...
- they change an address
16 matches
Mail list logo
