Re: [WSG] DIV Javascript Problem

2009-06-29 Thread Nathan de Vries
that client that they should find someone who is a little more proficient with Javascript and HTML to solve the problem. Cheers, Nathan de Vries *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe

Re: [WSG] Outlook 2010

2009-06-24 Thread Nathan de Vries
? I agree with you that Microsoft not being allowed to package their own browser with their operating system is a farce, but it's a bit of a stretch to say that it's driven their decision to switch to using Word as the rendering engine for Outlook. Cheers, Nathan de Vries

Re: [WSG] Outlook 2010

2009-06-24 Thread Nathan de Vries
versions of Outlook. Cheers, Nathan de Vries *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org ***

Re: [WSG] Outlook 2010

2009-06-24 Thread Nathan de Vries
, Nathan de Vries *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org ***

Re: [WSG] Ecomm using Paypal

2009-06-21 Thread Nathan de Vries
On 19/06/2009, at 4:17 PM, Rohini Goyal wrote: ...where can i find the right list of the attributes... Not really a web standards question, but if you do a search on the PDN you'll find this page [1] which outlines all the variables available and the expected values. Cheers, Nathan de

Re: [WSG] Safari background image problem with transparent PNGs

2009-03-31 Thread Nathan de Vries
On 30/03/2009, at 5:46 PM, Christian Montoya wrote: Any ideas? Not really helpful, but the example works fine in Safari 4. Could mean this is a bug specific to Safari 3. Cheers, Nathan de Vries *** List Guidelines: http

Re: [WSG] add to favorites?

2009-03-25 Thread Nathan de Vries
, Nathan de Vries *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org ***

Re: [WSG] add to favorites?

2009-03-25 Thread Nathan de Vries
*and* proprietary features of browsers (with a preference towards standards) is my definition of someone who takes standards seriously. Surprisingly (and unfortunately for many users of their software), some of the more vocal on this list seem to disagree. Cheers, Nathan de Vries

Re: [WSG] add to favorites?

2009-03-25 Thread Nathan de Vries
in positive ways, more often than not leading to standardisation. If vendors sat around holding hands trying to reach consensus before releasing features in their browsers, innovation would halt altogether. Nathan de Vries

Re: [WSG] add to favorites?

2009-03-25 Thread Nathan de Vries
and vendors, and contrary to (in my not so humble opinion) the spirit of the WSG mandate. Nathan de Vries On 26/03/2009, at 10:59 AM, Stuart Foulstone wrote: The Web Standards Group is for web designers developers who are interested in web standards (HTML, XHTML, XML, CSS, XSLT etc

Re: [WSG] add to favorites?

2009-03-25 Thread Nathan de Vries
on anyone when used appropriately. Appropriately being the key word there, and where people such as you and I may sometimes disagree. Cheers, Nathan de Vries *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm

Re: [WSG] Marking up news

2009-02-19 Thread Nathan de Vries
On 20/02/2009, at 7:05 AM, Essential eBiz Solutions wrote: I'm making a news plugin but I'm un-sure what the best/most accesible way is to mark it up? Try http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom#Examples_in_the_wild Cheers, Nathan de Vries

Re: [WSG] Frames/iFrames [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2009-01-12 Thread Nathan de Vries
Javascript, I don't see this as a problem at all. There's no hard-and-fast rule, though. Frames and/or iFrames in some situations might be wildly inappropriate. Cheers, -- Nathan de Vries *** List Guidelines: http

Re: [WSG] Code for Firefox, hack for IE

2008-09-01 Thread Nathan de Vries
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 22:09 +1000, willdonovan wrote: I do find that Opera can give a good idea of what might be happening with Safari if your a PC user... Safari has been available for Windows for a little while now. -- Nathan de Vries

Re: [WSG] firefox treatment of wrapper overflow height

2008-08-11 Thread Nathan de Vries
On 18/07/2008, at 7:45 AM, David Hucklesby wrote: Of course, there are several other ways to enclose floats that do not require that extra DIV. I would have thought that the method described by PIE [1] would be the only sane way to do this. -- Nathan de Vries [1] http