Remember that few people are as 'browser-aware' as we developers. Most
people just want to get on with their lives and businesses. The
technology they use to do so should be, ideally for them, transparent.
So for now, yes, I test and hack where necessary for IE5. To not do so
is to
If there were a california meeting, my vote goes for L.A.
Sacramento, is well, Sacramento. Not exactly my idea of a place to visit
and spend an extra day. San Francisco is great, but expensive. L.A. is
more central, has plenty of room, and can be affordable. Of course, if my
job covered
On Wednesday, May 5, 2004, at 23:54 US/Pacific, russ - maxdesign wrote:
Be more specific please. What is problem?
Russ
There is no visible navigation in Safari.
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
I also looked at the page at (1280x1024) and the text is overlapping the
photo. Is that intentional?
Hi! I tested your website and it's looking nice ;)
One problem though, I viewed the about us in 1024 X 768 resolution and
it looked fine, however, in anything less (e.g. 800 X 600) the padding
Hi guys,
[snip]
So what am I actually asking? I'm interested in what you guys consider
reasonable to expect from a graphic designer who also does some
overflow html. What would you be looking for? What would you ask in
the interview?
Thanks for any ideas,
K.
--
Kay Smoljak
When you make both height and width 76.1% of the default, the result is
less than 58% of the original.
But in the end, it seems to me the user gets the same font size as if
'body
{font-size: 100%;}, given that all the other font-sizes are set above 1em
for regular paragraphs and above 0.9em
I know... but I can't get around the Mac IE bugs and it makes things even
harder as I do not have a Mac to check against those bugs. Rather Mac IE
and
NS users see a plain text page than a broken design page.
So got to hide the styles till I am able to buy me a Mac but by that time
maybe
Hmm your comment is interesting. Interesting as in it makes me want to
rethink the need to hide stylesheets or not to.
There are many sites out there (be it professional or personal sites)
hiding
stylesheets from older browsers for e.g. the most common is Netscape 4x.
Wouldn't Netscape 4x
Somewhere out there, I lost my link to it in an old HDD crash, there is
a
site that allows you to test your site using the various perceptions
people
with various types of color blindness suffer from - it was actually quite
handy. But there is other sites out there now that atleast let you
The short hand will only work for web safe colors. That being said...
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A 10
B 11
C 12
D 13
E 14
F 15
F is the most on a color channel can be.
0 is the most off a color channel can be.
The color channels are: R G B (red, green, blue) and the color mixing
is additive. So as you
I have always written standards compliant css for a site around a
clients recommendations as to colours and position of logos etc. Now
I've been asked:
You'd be fine doing the templates from supplied photoshop files?
I guess this would mean replicating the look of a PSD file with css
code?
I've worked for companies that have websites that are so far afield of web
standards that using something standard will break their web pages. This
happens most often with web based content management systems. In those
cases, it is best just to work with the company's standards rather than
the
On Saturday, Mar 13, 2004, at 02:13 US/Pacific, Jaime Wong wrote:
I use these for some fancy header.
.icon-Gal
{
background-image : url(icon_gal.gif);
background-repeat : no-repeat;
background-position : 125px;
padding-top : 1em;
border-bottom : 1px dotted #448687;
padding-left :
Hi Peter,
The design appears to be clean. The site loads fast for me. My only wee
critique is that the gray font color doesn't have much contrast
compared to the background colors used. If it were a bit darker it
would be easier to read. Otherwise, I'm going to enjoy reading through
the site.
CSS is great that way. The text is easier to read now.
Cheers
Sarah
On Thursday, Mar 11, 2004, at 20:28 US/Pacific, Universal Head wrote:
Now THIS is why I love CS - I've just increased the contrast a little. Easss
Peter
On 12/03/2004, at 3:13 PM, Sarah Sammis wrote:
If it were
15 matches
Mail list logo
