Not sure if this is on-topic, but I've taken Russ's job and asked Dean
Edwards (of IE7 and WHATWG fame) a few questions regarding IE7, his
WaSP status, and general web speak. You can see it at
dantecubed.com/publications/dean-edwards-interview/.
--
Dante
dantecubed.com: Web Design, Development
The only reason was for this:
a href=#A cool link a href=#via/a/a. I thought it to be
logically correct.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
Is nesting one link inside another semantically incorrect? Such as a
href=#This is a a href=#link/a/a?
--
Dante
dantecubed.com: Web Design, Development more
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Way back in May of 2004 I asked this mailing list about their
favourite text editors. I am quite satisfied with TSW Web Coder, which
someone from this list pointed me to, but the new version is quite
obstrusive, and not XHTML compatible (only HTML 4). I am looking for a
Text Editor that has 4
Use Javascript. Insert the content with innerHTML.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
What about frames? Use ID too?
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
Well, as they say, if you have to use dropdowns you should probably
rethink your site structure.
The ALA article Andreas mentioned is actually not that good, since it
is still totally inaccessible to IE users with Javascript turned off.
There are no good alternatives on the web (yet), so I don't
The transitions were kinda dizzying but otherwise it looks very nice.
:) Nine thumbs up!
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:47:40 -0800, Chris Kennon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The header, if it were a transition between screens it would be
engaging. As a header element it loses it punch sitting at
If you can, you should try switching to a bigger resolution. It's much
better, and you'll wonder how you ever survived using 800x600.
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:49:45 -0500, Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The site is major better. Looks good, Loads fast, gives choice for
movie, tells size...
