Re: [WSG] Jello Mold not working right in IE/Win

2006-01-11 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Jan 10, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Seona Bellamy wrote:As a result, the last button of my main navigation is dropping down to the next line. We had this a lot. For us, it was a matter of making sure the actual content didn't exceed the available width of the content's container (possibly 'wrapper', if

Re: [WSG] Jello Mold not working right in IE/Win

2006-01-10 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Jan 9, 2006, at 5:25 PM, Seona Bellamy wrote:Can anyone who is running a larger resolution than 1024x768 please have a look and tell me if the layout is holding up? Sorry no time to peek, but I am using this on a current project...#sizer {width:_expression_(document.body.clientWidth 1554 ?

Re: [WSG] Mac FF hidden div still shows scrollbars

2005-12-23 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Dec 22, 2005, at 9:44 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: If we give it a height and apply overflow:scroll; (or auto) it looks and works dandy, except for Mac FF (1.5). We are still seeing the div's scroll bars when in it's hidden state. Try display:none, if that fits in your design.

[WSG] Mac FF hidden div still shows scrollbars

2005-12-22 Thread Thomas Livingston
Hi listers, We have a div being hidden (visibility:hidden;) and then using javascript to show hide layers (sort of a pop-up but not sorta thing). If we give it a height and apply overflow:scroll; (or auto) it looks and works dandy, except for Mac FF (1.5). We are still seeing the div's

Re: [WSG] Setting Up Font Sizes

2005-12-21 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Dec 21, 2005, at 5:43 AM, Felix Miata wrote: properly configured By this you mean default install? - Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist Media Logic www.mlinc.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

Re: [WSG] Setting Up Font Sizes

2005-12-21 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Dec 20, 2005, at 11:24 PM, Ric Raftis wrote: underlying agression I've seen it. - Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist Media Logic www.mlinc.com ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

Re: [WSG] IE on the MAC is history

2005-12-19 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Dec 19, 2005, at 11:03 AM, Richard Stephenson wrote: but does it mean we can stop coding for it now There's an IE for Macs??? - Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist Media Logic www.mlinc.com ** The discussion list for

Re: [WSG] CSS Driven?

2005-12-16 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Dec 15, 2005, at 6:32 PM, Terrence Wood wrote: How can you be stuck without a choice? Would you not at least alert them (clients or peers) to the fact that a better solution may exist? All good points sir. What I took from your original post was this (maybe I was just off base

Re: [WSG] CSS Driven?

2005-12-16 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Dec 16, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Terrence Wood wrote: My apologies, I never realised the visual design was non-negotiable. If you have the complete and total luxury of doing whatever the heck you want no matter what your clients want or ask for, then you are a lucky man indeed. - Tom

Re: [WSG] CSS Driven?

2005-12-16 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Dec 16, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Terrence Wood wrote: No, I don't want you to tell them the technical reason's of why one design is better than another. Yes, you do. The whole basis to my point is that in our little virtual situation, it's too late. The client saw the design. the client

Re: [WSG] CSS Driven?

2005-12-16 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Dec 16, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Christian Montoya wrote: My thinking is that if I ever had to do one of these sites, I would not put it in my portfolio. Oops. My mistake. I accidentally wandered in to the elitist teachers' lounge. I'll just get back out into the hall where I belong. Do

Re: [WSG] CSS Driven?

2005-12-15 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Dec 15, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Terrence Wood wrote: encouraging your clients to look to other design solutions that don't reply on the use of tables for layout This is just completely unrealistic. First, don't submit a design that you can't build. Otherwise, if you are not the designer, and

Re: [WSG] positive-discrimination === not positive and IMG properties

2005-12-13 Thread Thomas Livingston
On Dec 13, 2005, at 3:50 PM, Jonathan Bloy wrote: You mean everyone who uses Internet Explorer. That's the only browser that treats alt attributes as a tool tip. Modern browsers, Firefox, Opera, Safari, etc. correctly only display the alt attribute if the image is not available. If I am

Re: IE Compliant (was RE: [WSG] (No subject header))

2005-05-27 Thread Thomas Livingston
On May 27, 2005, at 1:05 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Funny how one can play with words. If a Web _site_ advertised that, I'd take it as We hacked the crap out of our code so IE users can see it too. ;-) Tom Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist Media Logic www.mlinc.com ---

[WSG] Anyone see this?

2005-05-26 Thread Thomas Livingston
Curious about what The Pros ;-) thought of this. Anyone got any insight/info/anecdotes/opinions? Is it a new wrapper on IE? Is it compliant? http://www.deepnetexplorer.com/ Thomas Livingston Senior Multimedia Artist Media Logic www.mlinc.com --- www.browsehappy.com