so how'd you get this thread?
hehe sorry. thanks for the tip, I'm setting it up now (so I won't hear
your reply to my smart-ass comment I guess) ;)
Neerav wrote:
Making a mail filter similar to this:
IF
Subject contains : out of office
AND
Subject contains : [WSG]
MOVE TO Trash
Works fine for me
tested in IE (I suspect that's were the
problems emerge?)
Darian
Michael Kear wrote:
Second try I didnt see anyone post about this yesterday everyone
was too busy debating PHP and javascript instead. Perhaps today then ..
Ive added a specials box to my auslegs site using that cute
I've never seen a discussion quite like this... I'm sorry is this OT?
Just a sec, I'll check my dictionary (-_-; )
For all you avid dictionary readers out there -
A reference book containing an alphabetical list of words, with
information given for each word, usually including meaning,
(^_^) But it would be a bit
easier for the viewer if the text sized better.
Congradulations on the new site!
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cabot Consultants Pty Ltd
Software Engineer / Website Design
http://www.cabotconsultants.com.au
I'm guessing the solutions you've tried have been js?
How have you tried to validate it? As long as the js is correctly
implemented in the html (xhtml?) using the script tags it should validate.
Maybe I've missed the point (_; )
Regards,
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cabot
Well I have very little js experience also... I do know that and id is
meant to be used only once in a html document. Does the code still work
with the repeated ids converted to class?
I guess that's worth a try anyways if you haven't already ;)
btw... It's Darian, not Damien (_) I get
on the top of every page, pdf is really the
easiest and safest way. In saying that, that doesn't stop most people
printing straight from the webpage (_)
Goodluck,
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cabot Consultants Pty Ltd
Software Engineer / Website Design
http
IE to work with it. Personally I steer clear of it for
the time being.
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cabot Consultants Pty Ltd
Software Engineer / Website Design
http://www.cabotconsultants.com.au
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I'm not sure if my understanding of min
*
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cabot Consultants Pty Ltd
Software Engineer / Website Design
http://www.cabotconsultants.com.au
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
*
The discussion list for http
No problems on Win98SE with...
IE 6.0 SP1
FireFox 0.8
Opera 7.23
Netscape 7.1
Tested with 1024x768 and 800x600 res.
Nice looking site btw :)
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cabot Consultants Pty Ltd
Software Engineer / Website Design
http://www.cabotconsultants.com.au
Oops! Just tried it with largest text in IE 6.0 SP1 on Win98SE, I got the
same problem, the right sidebar spills into the center. Different text
sizes seemed fine in firfox 0.8 and netscape 7.1 (and of course Opera).
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cabot Consultants Pty Ltd
This is probably obvious...
I would like to open a link in a new window. I used to use target=_blank
attribute, but that isn't xhtml strict. Can anyone enlighten me on a xhtml
strict method? as I'd like my pages to verify ^^
Cheers,
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cabot
look into it. I had no ideas my posts were so late until
recently.
Regards,
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cabot Consultants Pty Ltd
Software Engineer / Website Design
http://www.cabotconsultants.com.au
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I think there must be something wrong
Sorry. Everytime I reply it takes a long time to appear in the thread. I
dunno if it's my mail service or what, but that message I wrote didn't
appear for ages. (_)
...you might see this one by tomorrow?? :P and by that time maybe it's
also on the discussion board (-_-; )
Darian Cabot
You have the leftDiv inside MainDiv. leftDiv is 100% height... Just...
100% height of mainDiv (it's parent). You'll need to set mainDiv to 100%,
whatever height mainDiv is, leftDiv will follow in your setup.
Hope that helps!
Oh by-the-way, you have an awesome name ;)
Regards,
Darian Cabot
G'day Gary
Toowoomba, I think it's about the same distance as Brizzy from Gold
coast.(_)
Anyways, nice to know of someone in my area!
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Software Engineer - Website Design
http://www.cabotconsultants.com.au
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hi
People of brissy and nearby...
we've seriously got enough for some kinda gathering of some sort. It's a
definate possibility in the pipeline.
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Software Engineer - Website Design
http://www.cabotconsultants.com.au
I just had a play with it and found this...
the CSS is fine. If you delete all the spaces and line brakes between the
list items like this
liitem1/liliitem2/lili
it fixes the probelm. Hope that helps,
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Software Engineer - Website Design
http
the
latest versions of the more popular browsers, but I'm concerned about how
my CSSs hold up against the earlier browsers (IE4, NN4, NN5, IE5Mac - I've
noticed these are mentioned a lot).
Are there any attributes to be careful of as a rule of thumb?
Thanks,
Darian Cabot
: scroll; will give the div scroll bars, and
overflow: visible; will show it usually by stretching the height of the
div.
Maybe that was completely useless, hope it helps though.
Darian
Hi everybody...
I'm having a terrible time trying to figure out just why IE6 (Windows
XP) is throwing scrollbars
with tables apon tables, divs save a ton of code and time but they
take time to get used to.
Darian
Yes, but it's not the overflow of the div, it's the frame itself. The
page is going larger than the frame window - meaning, the divs aren't
respecting the size of the window. Sorry if my
Wow what the hell happened to NS??!! Going by those figures I should be
focassing my attention to Mozilla compatability. Thanks for the stats.
Darian
I actually decided to look in detail at my logs over the past month after
people brought up the Browser compatibility issues:
This is what I
that comment may offend you but I
have been careful to selelct legible and clear fonts.
Thanks for your concern, but I'm quite happy how the wesite functions.
Regards,
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Software Engineer - Website Design
http://www.cabotconsultants.com.au
falty code. I'm all
for streamlining websites
Regards,
Darian Cabot
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Software Engineer - Website Design
http://www.cabotconsultants.com.au
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Trimming excess fat off of the code does add up over time - both in
storage
wondering... What is the difference of
using the percentage font-size as opposed to the preset medium, small,
x-small, etc sizes? Are these 'preset' sizes still relative to the body
user defined font size?
Cheers
Darian
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 15:55, Lorenzo Gabba | Quirk wrote:
I tend to agree
sizes? Are these 'preset' sizes still relative to the body
user defined font size?
Cheers
Darian
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 15:55, Lorenzo Gabba | Quirk wrote:
I tend to agree - I'm a fan of the
p, .etc
{
font-size: 0.75em;
line-height 1.5;
}
I forgot to mention that it's probably
? OR if I then leave it as
medium, x-small, etc, will these be reduced by by the body font percentage
also?
I think the general idea is %s. Just, so many ways to do it (_)
Thanks,
Darian...newby (_)
The x-small and others are refered to as absolute-size keywords
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2
for the suggestions
Darian
Should you have classes with the same name as html tags? ie class body?
How I see it being a problem for a coder, is if you have; body { blah blah
} and then .body { blah blah } it could get confusing.
You may not need the body class, because you could assume all p tags
Wow thanks!
My printer is now working overtime with these articles :P
I can't believe the great response I've got from WSG! I found it last
night, and so far it's helped me more than anything.
- Darian
Hi Darian
This article might answer your questions
http://www.alistapart.com/articles
and as soon as I have a remedied CSS
I'll be sure to let you know (^^
Thanks again, this feedback is very helpful
Darian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a website I've recently developed (www.cabotconsultants.com.au) I
opted
for this...
p.body {
font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif
me :P
Darian
You could also use css to generate specific qualities for say print using
the @media
This allows for you to target say the printer and specify a formatting for
printing your pages instead of relying on browsers default settings which
may not be printer friendly. You can set
the backup font will be arial,
all they'll need to do is change their browser font size the next setting
up.
What are your thoughts?
Darian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tested the webpage on 3 differnet monitor on anything from 800X600
up.
I've also tested it in Netscape, IE, Opera
*phew* ain't that true!!
I'm considering changing the fonts for my website's CSS to arial... maybe.
I still like verdana, I'm so stubborn (_) I don't think either of
these font are really offending to anyone. Maybe if I was considering some
crazy artistic font it could annoy some viewers. I
33 matches
Mail list logo