Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-08 Thread tee
But if Tee were using an ideographic writing system for one or more of Chinese sites or any other targeted use of his access keys, then he's not working with the limits of 26 alphabetic characters, nor the sum total of punction and other signs, nor both of these with the decimal numerics

RE: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-08 Thread Gian Sampson-Wild \(PurpleTop\)
. ABN 23 090 593 525 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Trick Sent: Friday, 8 April 2005 5:20 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Access Key question If your not one of those 'javascript-is-evil' people you could use

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-07 Thread Albert Gedraitis
But if Tee were using an ideographic writing system for one or more of Chinese sites or any other targeted use of his access keys, then he's not working with the limits of 26 alphabetic characters, nor the sum total of punction and other signs, nor both of these with the decimal numerics 0-9. He

[WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread tee
I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although opinion are spitted, I decided to implement access keys on my sites. While fixing my sites in different languages, I realized I cannot use the same access keys for both, say Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese, and here a

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
tee wrote: I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although opinion are spitted, I decided to implement access keys on my sites. While fixing my sites in different languages, I realized I cannot use the same access keys for both, say Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese, and

RE: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Drake, Ted C.
for some interesting debates. Ted -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tee Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 12:36 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Access Key question I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Kim Kruse
Hi Tee, I don't think you should use access keys for all pages. Only the most important pages as sitemaps, search etc. Kim ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Lennart Fylling
tee wrote: In this case there are only 36 access keys we can use. How can one solves this dilemma if a site involve with more than 36 pages? It might be enough to use accesskeys on your main navigation (home,about etc). I've not seen your page, so I don't know if the MainNav includes more than

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Carl Reynolds
tee wrote: I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although opinion are spitted, I decided to implement access keys on my sites. While fixing my sites in different languages, I realized I cannot use the same access keys for both, say Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese, and

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Luc
Good evening tee, It was foretold that on 6-4-2005 @ 12:35:59 GMT-0700 (which was 21:35:59 where I live) tee would write: snipped a bit t I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although opinion are t spitted, I decided to implement access keys on my sites. Maybe you

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Carl Reynolds
Carl Reynolds wrote: tee wrote: I'd read a couple of blogs regarding the access keys, although opinion are spitted, I decided to implement access keys on my sites. While fixing my sites in different languages, I realized I cannot use the same access keys for both, say Traditional Chinese and

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Peter J. Farrell
Carl Reynolds wrote: How long is your access key? If the access key is only one letter long then there are only 36 possible keys, if it is two letters long there are 36*36 = 1296 possible keys, if three letter 36*36*36 = 46656 possible keys, etc. Carl. Fun, fun, I doubt anyone wants to mash

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Peter J. Farrell
Carl Reynolds wrote: How long is your access key? If the access key is only one letter long then there are only 36 possible keys, if it is two letters long there are 36*36 = 1296 possible keys, if three letter 36*36*36 = 46656 possible keys, etc. Carl. Fun, fun, I doubt anyone want to mash

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
Carl Reynolds wrote: How long is your access key? If the access key is only one letter long then there are only 36 possible keys, if it is two letters long there are 36*36 = 1296 possible keys, if three letter 36*36*36 = 46656 possible keys, etc. You can't have multi-letter accesskeys... --

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread tee
tee wrote: In this case there are only 36 access keys we can use. How can one solves this dilemma if a site involve with more than 36 pages? It might be enough to use accesskeys on your main navigation (home,about etc). My site is fine. I don't need 36 access keys :) It has three

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread tee
Thanks for the links, Luc. I sure will read them. By the way, are you the same Luc I recently known? How do you pronounce your name if I may ask. tee Good evening tee, It was foretold that on 6-4-2005 @ 12:35:59 GMT-0700 (which was 21:35:59 where I live) tee would write: snipped a

Re: [WSG] Access Key question

2005-04-06 Thread Luc
Hello tee, It was foretold that on 7-4-2005 @ 16:50:48 GMT-0700 (which was 1:50:48 where I live) tee would write: snipped a bit t By the way, are you the same Luc I recently known? Yes, the one and only ;-) t How do you pronounce your name if I may ask. For native english speakers