-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Peter Firminger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 5 maart 2004 8:38
PS: While I'm at it a quick member country count...
[...]
Netherlands 1
[...]
The Netherlands 2
[...]
Mmm... :)
Total 309 members in 35 countries
Tom Verhoeve,
from
On Friday 05 March 2004 09:37, Peter wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
Firstly thanks for joining! You wrapped up one of the two continents we
were missing in our members. Only Antarctica to go now (I think?).
Thanks a bunch James/Peter. I'll take your recommendations to heart.
Actually, I'm a big
Carl
You should be able to do a blah://blah.blah.tld in the text and the
client *should* be smart enough to pick up that this is hyperlink and
display it as hot. The Mozilla clients and Eudora do this.
Additionally adding mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *should* be rendered by the
browser as a mail
don't care. I hope that one day both
vacation messages and the extremely rude read receipts will be dropped
from email specs.
P
-Original Message-
From: Carl Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 5:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Email Standards
Hyperlinking URIs and email addresses in plain text emails is
handled by the
client (e.g. Outlook) so there is no need.
Let me add to that. With a URI , starting with http:// or www. should kick
in a link. For a site like webstandardsgroup.org (which doesn't ever use
www.) you would need to
Hi all,
I realise this may not be 100% relevant to this discussion group, but is there
some kind of standard for email html design?
I refer specifically to techniques that allow for graceful degradation when a
newer feature (e.g. CSS2) isn't supported by an email client.
I've spent some time
Hi
One of the many RFC's on the subject is a good place to start. Use of
plain text is highly recommended. Check out the SitePoint newsletters
for good emails in plain text. If you do write an HTML email, stick with
a small subset of HTML or send the newsletter etc as a PDF attachment if
your
Hi Lorenzo,
Firstly thanks for joining! You wrapped up one of the two continents we were
missing in our members. Only Antarctica to go now (I think?).
You could try looking at the document on
http://webstandardsgroup.org/go/resource135.cfm
Regards,
Peter
PS: While I'm at it a quick member
