[WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread Collin Davis
Hey everybody, I just asked for some advice on css-d, regarding gallery pages, very similar to www.strombergarchitectural.com/products.php - the same pages I asked for help on with cleaner, more semantic code on this list not too long ago. The advice I received from several people, and

Re: [WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread Chris Moncus
(X)HTML is so dualistic sometimes. Meaning that there are so many ways that work fine but yet they are still not correct. In your case, the extremes argue no tables, period vs tables within tables within tables. The same extreme views apply to lists as well. The best use of (X)HTML is to

RE: [WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread Collin Davis
Jan Brasna wrote: Well, although definition lists are IMHO OK, I use just anonymous elements (+ headings, paragraphs etc.) - http://wellstyled.com/css-photo-cards.html or http://murphy.cz/hofy/galerie-plavacek.htm Jan, I see how the technique on the two pages you linked to works, and I like

RE: [WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread Collin Davis
Chris, Thanks for your response. It's funny - before I went to using unordered lists for this, I had been using ALA's recommendation. However I wasn't very happy with it semantically. Ted Drake made this distinction: With the current div setup, you have information but there is no connection

Fwd: [WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread Chris Moncus
On Jan 4, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Collin Davis wrote: I don't agree with either position - I think tables should be used when displaying tabular data, but definitely not overused as is the case when using tables for presentation. Sorry, I left out the sentence that I meant to say And neither of those

Re: [WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread JohnyB
The only thing I would bring up with regards to the markup is that I really don't see how those elements could be marked up as paragraphs. I definitely agree with you Collin. I just want to show this as an example how to structure it in a different way than by some types of lists. It is neither

Re: [WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread Charles Martin
Collin Davis wrote: Tables wouldnt do this. Also, lists are just easier for me to use than tables, and tables create more code weight than do lists. Anybody have thoughts on this? Well, for me, the deciding factor on using a table is if the elements contained in the table are 2 dimensional.

Re: [WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread Michael Wilson
Collin Davis wrote: I just asked for some advice on css-d, regarding gallery pages, very similar to www.strombergarchitectural.com/products.php http://www.strombergarchitectural.com/products.php - the same pages I asked for help on with cleaner, more semantic code on this list not too long

RE: [WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread Collin Davis
Charles Martin wrote: Well, for me, the deciding factor on using a table is if the elements contained in the table are 2 dimensional. In other words, can they be grouped in two dimensions. For example, a list of population grouped by cities AND age ranges would be two dimensional and would

RE: [WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread Collin Davis
Jan Brasna wrote: (PS: I'm sorry for my English, I hope you can understand it...) Your English is far better than my Czech ;) Cheers, Collin Davis - ACE, MCP Web Architect Stromberg Architectural Products p 903.454.0904 f 903.454.3642 e [EMAIL PROTECTED] web

Re: [WSG] Gallery markup

2005-01-04 Thread Charles Martin
Paul Novitski wrote: At 11:34 AM 1/4/05, Charles Martin wrote: Tables wouldn't do this. Also, lists are just easier for me to use than tables, and tables create more code weight than do lists. Anybody have thoughts on this? Well, for me, the deciding factor on using a table is if the elements