Re: [WSG] IE7 may ship ahead of Longhorn

2005-02-16 Thread Kornel Lesinski
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:57:17 +1100, Chris Blown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know why MS just don't do what Apple did with Safari and leverage an open source rendering engine like Gecko or KHtml. That doesn't fit world domination plan. MS must OWN everything. Oh, that's right they'd break all

[WSG] IE7 may ship ahead of Longhorn

2005-02-15 Thread Chris Blown
This doesn't appear to have been posted to the list yet. Sorry in advance if it has. http://news.com.com/Reversal+Next+IE+update+divorced+from+Windows/2100-1032_3-5577263.html Good news for web standards? Chris ** The discussion list for

Re: [WSG] IE7 may ship ahead of Longhorn

2005-02-15 Thread John Allsopp
Chris, http://news.com.com/Reversal+Next+IE+update+divorced+from+Windows/2100-1032_3-5577263.html Good news for web standards? Being the eternal naysayer that I am, I'll say, um, nay. Why? >From the article linked, this quote from a ms spokesperson Microsoft's Nash declined to shed any

Re: [WSG] IE7 may ship ahead of Longhorn

2005-02-15 Thread Bruce Morrison
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 10:03, John Allsopp wrote: Chris, http://news.com.com/Reversal+Next+IE+update+divorced+from+Windows/2100-1032_3-5577263.html Good news for web standards? Being the eternal naysayer that I am, I'll say, um, nay. Why? From the article

Re: [WSG] IE7 may ship ahead of Longhorn

2005-02-15 Thread Chris Blown
On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 10:03, John Allsopp wrote: Being the eternal naysayer that I am, I'll say, um, nay. On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 11:35, Bruce Morrison wrote: Also it should be noted that IE7 will only be for Longhorn and XP SP2. Older IE browsers will be with us for a while yetor