[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this definition list code I feel is not the most semantic way to
solve the problem (not using the dl as it was intended). However, I
also feel that what I have currently is also not perfect (and if it is,
is em better than strong??).
Hi Nathan,
why don't you
06, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Most semantic XHTML markup possible - your thoughts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this definition list code I feel is not the most semantic way to
solve the problem (not using the dl as it was intended). However, I
also feel that what I have currently is also
Nathan
I have considered this myself. Its almost tabular data really - th and td
- in some respects more so than a definition list.
I have built my own cms over the years which outputs similar data - these
days i just use :
pstrongTitle/strong data/p
I do not think a standard ordered, or
@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Most semantic XHTML markup possible - your thoughts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this definition list code I feel is not the most semantic way
to solve the problem (not using the dl as it was intended).
However
problem.
Regards,
Nathan
- Original Message - From: Ian Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Most semantic XHTML markup possible - your thoughts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this definition list code I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, in my case, I just felt that 100 223 578 does not define
Customer Identification Number (CID). ...So am I wrong in my
thinking about definitions lists?? Can a random bunch of digits such
as 100 223 578 really be a definition that means Customer
Identification
Thanks everyone for your feedback. I think I will go down the dl path for
now. I have a WSG meeting I will be attending this Friday (in Canberra). If
there is room to raise it I will, to get some others peoples reaction and
possible solutions they may have found.
Thanks again,
Nathan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I quickly scanned the archive but cannot find a discussion that exactly matches
what I am trying to achieve. I want to markup some text and want to know if I'm
doing it the most semantic (and accessible) way possible.
ok, here is an example of some text and
@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Most semantic XHTML markup possible - your thoughts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I quickly scanned the archive but cannot find a discussion that exactly
matches what I am trying to achieve. I want to markup
I just felt that a definition list was intended to define terms.
So am I wrong in my thinking about definitions lists?
Partly. The scope of their usage is pretty much wide. For me the sign of
the possibility to use them is equivalency. Not only an explanation,
even any equivalent relation in
10 matches
Mail list logo
