A directory is a good idea, however there are quite a few sites doing
similar things these days.
Somebody could write a bot that validates as it crawls. Then you could
have a standards compliant SE.
Andy Budd
http://www.message.uk.com/
*
The
Andy Budd wrote:
A directory is a good idea, however there are quite a few sites doing
similar things these days.
Somebody could write a bot that validates as it crawls. Then you could
have a standards compliant SE.
Andy Budd
http://www.message.uk.com/
Hello.
I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A Web
Directory where only Valid W3C sites will be accepted. What do you
think? Should I continue?
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
HELL YEAH!!!
- Original Message -
From: Razvan Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:58 AM
Subject: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory
Hello.
I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A Web
Directory where
Message-
From: Razvan Pop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] OT - Standards Compliant Websites Directory
Hello.
I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A Web
Directory where only Valid W3C sites
Razvan Pop wrote:
I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A
Web Directory where only Valid W3C sites will be accepted. What do you
think? Should I continue?
Interesting idea. If you do so, you'll need to recheck validity on a
regular basis. In which case, you should do
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:58:25 +0300, Razvan Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A Web
Directory where only Valid W3C sites will be accepted. What do you
think? Should I continue?
I think it's a great idea. However, rather than only sites
hi
Russ have a post on this list check list for development
I'v post it in my personal blog
http://www.jadmadi.net/site/index.php?p=21
I'm not sure if you can search for it in this list archive.
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 06:46:25 +0800, Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003
Off topic etc...
But this email is dated on my machine as the 24th June 2003...
What the hell?!?!
Razvan Pop wrote:
Hello.
I've started to build a Standards Compliant Websites Directory. A
Web Directory where only Valid W3C sites will be accepted. What do you
think? Should I continue?
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:53:19 +1000, Chris Stratford wrote:
But this email is dated on my machine as the 24th June 2003...
Razvan computer has the date set incorrectly. Its quite common.
People, could we please not clutter the list with this sort of thing?
If you have an issue with the
10 matches
Mail list logo
