John Latter wrote:
You've just started? Crikey - I must have the IQ odf a banana then!
:) (see? I can't even spell off!)
No apparent IQ problems at your end ;-)
(must be the keyboard's fault...)
Call me a slow starter... :-) ...as I've been handling bits and bytes
and code since before they
Thanks Georg - not least for the idea of blaming my keyboard!
It's only the code that is for Google, the content is for humans but I'm
interested in such an unpopular are of evolution that getting the
css/html code right is quite important (cos I need all the help I can get).
I'm offline in
On 18/02/2006, at 4:09 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:Just a question: is it "xhtml 1.0 which may be served as xhtml and/orhtml" or "html with an xhtml DTD, lowercase and slashes, and served ashtml" you are recommending?I have no problems with the former since I use it all the time, but thelatter is
Steve Olive wrote:
:-) pony below
I guess it's just a matter of trying to keep up the good ideals and
getting more designers on board with XHTML served as XHTML HTML.
I'm actually surprised how many tutorials I see that use HTML 4.01 in
computer magazines in 2006. If we can't convince
On 2/16/06, John Latter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://evomech2.blogspot.com/2006/02/re-evomech-re-peer-review-and-genetic.html
Its a 2 column layout and I think the relevant css code is:
div#mainClm{float:right;width:66%;padding:30px 7% 10px
3%;border-left:dotted 1px #E0AD12;}
John Latter wrote:
http://evomech2.blogspot.com/2006/02/re-evomech-re-peer-review-and-genetic.html
The first problem (which occurs on Firefox but not IE6) can be seen
at the bottom of the above page where the sidebar text overflows
into main content area. I have tried to fix it myself but with
Thank you Gunlaug, I'm quite new to css and had to read your comments
several times before they even began to sink in!
I chose the current Doctype largely out of ignorance but also because I
believed that browsers would be more tolerant of bad/incorrent css
coding - the word 'strict' made me
I would recommend using the XHTML 1.0 Transitional DTD instead of HTML 4.01 - for the simple reason that there is a bit more tolerance for user-friendly options but you are following the XML standards of lower case tags and attributes, all tags being closed, preferably CSS for positioning but
Steve Olive wrote:
I would recommend using the XHTML 1.0 Transitional DTD instead of
HTML 4.01 - for the simple reason that there is a bit more tolerance
for user-friendly options but you are following the XML standards of
lower case tags and attributes, all tags being closed, preferably CSS
On 2/17/06, Steve Olive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would recommend using the XHTML 1.0 Transitional DTD instead of HTML 4.01
- for the simple reason that there is a bit more tolerance for user-friendly
options but you are following the XML standards of lower case tags and
attributes, all tags
On 18/02/2006 Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
John Latter wrote:
Thank you Gunlaug, I'm quite new to css and had to read your comments
several times before they even began to sink in!
:-)
...and I've just started ;-)
Just take your time and get the basics right from the beginning. Much
easier
Thanks Steve! The Firefox extensions will be useful (providing I
understand what they do) - I also have HTML-Kit which I haven't used for
ages. I recently downloaded a new version but have yet to find out how
to put HTML Tidy into it again.
Could I have a link to your template please?
John
12 matches
Mail list logo
