* Paul Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-16 00:12]:
Great topic!
I had some experience using xml / xslt earlier this year. I was
fiddling with w3schools xslt tutorial which uses client-side xslt
transformation and I finally saw what all the xml fuss was about.
The content could be marked
Paul Bennett wrote:
As soon as there is consistent browser support for client side xslt,
we'll be able to deliver pure xml to the client and have it apply style
and layout as the / browser chooses. True accessibility and universality.
The problem, though, would be that everybody will invent
On 8/16/05, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Bennett wrote:
As soon as there is consistent browser support for client side xslt,
we'll be able to deliver pure xml to the client and have it apply style
and layout as the / browser chooses. True accessibility and universality.
The
The beauty of this is that you can include xslt libraries to pretty
much rewrite the most horrid html to clean standards based xhtml.
The additional bonus of this is that you can rearrange the semantic
layout of the html at will using nothing more than xslt.
Before I unsub because you all
Rick Faaberg wrote:
Before I unsub because you all are way over my head, how do you know this?
Do you just pull it out of your *ss?
Sorry? Nice way to get an answer.
I know this because I have been doing this for the last 12 months -and
so have many, many others.
I guess I just don't
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:33:31 -0700, Rick Faaberg wrote:
Before I unsub because you all are way over my head, how do you know this?
Do you just pull it out of your *ss?
Don't unsub - where else will you be exposed to so much stuff you
hadn't even dreamed of?
:)
warmly,
Lea
--
Lea de Groot
Rick Faaberg
The beauty of this is that you can include xslt libraries to pretty
much rewrite the most horrid html to clean standards based xhtml.
The additional bonus of this is that you can rearrange the semantic
layout of the html at will using nothing more than xslt.
Before I
Hi,
Wasn't quite articulating this prior to your reply but the PHP
includes and serving the correct doctype, with PHP are true boons to
smaller sites attempting semanticity.
On Aug 15, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Rei Paki wrote:
Paul
Separating core content from other structural content was
Great topic!
I had some experience using xml / xslt earlier this year. I was fiddling with
w3schools xslt tutorial which uses client-side xslt transformation and I
finally saw what all the xml fuss was about. The content could be marked up
meaningfully (according to the actual data) then xslt
Great topic!
I had some experience using xml / xslt earlier this year. I was
fiddling with w3schools xslt tutorial which uses client-side xslt
transformation and I finally saw what all the xml fuss was about. The
content could be marked up meaningfully (according to the actual
data) then
10 matches
Mail list logo
