Quoting Daniel Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Seems like keeping developers employed in jobs that support web
standards would be important to web standards themselves.
I agree.
All the best,
--
Ian Fenn
Chopstix Media
http://www.chopstixmedia.com/
Ian Fenn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Seems like keeping developers employed in jobs that support web
standards would be important to web standards themselves.
I agree.
Me too. Whose decision was not to allow job vacancies to be posted?
Before anyone else decided to comment on a thread that has already been
closed, here are a few things you should all know about jobs and closed
threads...
1. we asked all members for opinion on job posts to the list in our recent
survey. For those who may have forgotten, the results are here:
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:32:23 -0500, Bruce wrote:
reply where?
Thread closed, please.
Daniel was being very naughty (gosh, I feel like the alternate
personality for the Heart of Gold in HHGTTG g) in posting the job
here - the mail guidelines clearly say that 'Employment opportunities'
aren't
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lea de Groot
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 1:46 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: ADMIN - thread closed Re: [WSG] Web Standards Developer Job
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 19:32:23 -0500, Bruce wrote:
reply where?
Thread closed
At the risk of being slightly OT, it's good to see that finally big
business are hiring Web Standards Developers (although I wonder who's
hiring - Microsoft Australia perhaps?):
http://mycareer.com.au/jobseeker/job/viewjob.aspx?jobid=2699588j_o=web+
