Hi list,
Something I've been pondering - how best to handle buttons and other purely
functional content residing within a block of selected text? Often a user
will select a bunch of text and get something like:
Some Headingminimiseclose
Some text etc etc.
I was thinking about adding JS mouse
I'm curious how others might approach this problem. The goal is elegant text
selection.
Solution — good structure of content, so user may easily select only text he
need. Wisely use spaces and problem disappears.
***
List
At 6/12/2009 01:42 AM, James Ducker wrote:
Something I've been pondering - how best to handle buttons and other
purely functional content residing within a block of selected text?
Often a user will select a bunch of text and get something like:
Some Headingminimiseclose
Some text etc etc.
html
body
This is a input type=button value=test / of the copied content
/body
/html
Firefox: This is a of the copied content
Chrome: This is a of the copied content
IE: This is a of the copied content
Just style the button to look like regular text etc, add your javascript to
For all you know, their purpose in copying text from the page is to illustrate
in a document that aspect of the page layout that includes the controls.
That's very true.
A more elegant bulletproof solution might be to rethink the page layout and
visually place the controls above or to the
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:48:06 -0600, Shane Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An external link to another site doesn't validate (line 40). I get
several errors.
Did you read the information provided by the validator?
The first error picked up by the validator is on Line 40, column 69.
cannot
Shane,
One way around the problem is to use some _javascript_ and the rel="external" property.
Firstly, here is the _javascript_:
function externalLinks() { if (!document.getElementsByTagName) return; var anchors = document.getElementsByTagName("a"); for (var i=0; ianchors.length; i++) { var
I have a site I am working on. All the pages I've created validate
except:
http://sonze.com/isl/res1.html
An external link to another site doesn't validate (line 40). I get
several errors. Is there anything I can do to make the page validate
or is it a lost cause since I don't control the
You need to encode your ampersands as amp;
For example, this:
http://domain.com/foo.php?barcar
Should be changed to this:
http://domain.com/foo.php?baramp;car
-Sage
On Jul 16, 2004, at 3:48 PM, Shane Helm wrote:
I have a site I am working on. All the pages I've created validate
except:
Shane,
You can create TinyUrls for the long list of links.
More info here: http://tinyurl.com/
Or you can also go to Dan Benjamin's excellent URL cleaner
http://automaticlabs.com/products/urlcleaner/
All the best.
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 16:48:06 -0600,
This thread is now closed. Please put up your editors on the WSG website
in the category provided. I've provided instructions on how to do this
in a previous post.
regards
James
Michael Donnermeyer wrote:
On the Macs I usually use either Dreamweaver MX 2004 (code view) or
BBEdit 7.1 for all my
WinSyntax for winsucks
BlueFish for mandrake
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 10:17:55 +1000, James Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all
I have started a new category on the WSG site call Development and
design tools. I think at this point it would be a good idea for
everyone to login and start
At 05:07 on Sunday, 06 Jun 2004, helmut wrote:
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing?
Topstyle Pro 3.1 is my choice. Simply the best windows application for
handcoding html / CSS includes most language syntax coloring and mapping
for local live previews via
Accessible Web Developer (without shares in TopStyle)
www.seowebsitepromotion.com
www.gawds.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John McDougald
Sent: 06 June 2004 05:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] What Editors do you guys use
Without question, the best editor out there (at least until the next
version come out--which should be soon) is TopStyle 3.10. Full support
for XHTML 1.1 (a default template is missing, but can be added in under
a minute), CSS-2, and Ruby. It has code highlighting for several
scripting
On 6/6/04 3:39 AM Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Ruby
What is Ruby?
TIA
Rick Faaberg
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
helmut wrote:
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing?
vim. (and occasionally dreamweaver.)
no. really.
http://www.vim.org
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
is not cool. Complain to the developer
directly if you have a problem.
Play nice now...
P
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Faaberg
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 8:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys
Rick Faaberg wrote:
On 6/6/04 3:39 AM Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Ruby
What is Ruby?
http://www.ruby-lang.org
it's an object-oriented scripting language. very powerful language, and
pushed object-oriented programming to its limit.
but this is now off-topic...
TIA
Rick
Subject: Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys use?
hmm
Topstyle Pro 3.10 - CSS
Dreamweaver MX 2004 7.01 - XHTML/PHP
Browsers
Mozilla 1.7 RC1
IE 6 SP1
Opera 7.50
http://www.danvine.com/icapture/
Safari testing...
http://www.danvine.com/iecapture/
IE 6/5.5/5/4, Firefox Opera
I use jEdit. Has FTP and SFTP support. Lots and lots of plugins
to install.
helmut wrote:
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing?
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Rick Faaberg wrote:
What is Ruby?
Contrary to what others seem to have thought, I meant the Ruby Annotation
specification from the W3C:
http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby/
I mentioned Ruby support not because I think it's that useful in most
instances, but rather what having the support says
Original Message -
From: "helmut" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] What Editors do you guys
use?
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you
guys use for hand coding and testing?
I now use UltraEdit-32.
Simon
Jessey--mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clean code = HomeSite 5.5!
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Benjamin
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 1:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] What Editors do you guys use?
Homesite 5.5
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of helmut
Sent: Sunday, 6 June 2004 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] What Editors do you guys use?
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing
Title: [WSG] What to do?
Dante,
Best
by example: rebuild without tables and say, Hey, this is how easy it is, would
you like me to do the rest for you? As it's a non-profit org, they will likely
be concerned about bandwidth and if, as you say, the site proves popular, the
bandwidth will go
Title: RE: [WSG] What to do?
Best by Example...
That's what I was going to do (in fact, I came really close, but a certain browser interfered and I gave up). Perhaps I'll try when I come back from Ireland.
He'll have to pay me in Sunflower Seeds (my latest addiction) since I'm under
Hello all
I have started a new category on the WSG site call Development and
design tools. I think at this point it would be a good idea for
everyone to login and start listing all these programs on the WSG
website so that we can refer to these in the future, without having to
navigate thru a
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing?
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
On Sat, 5 Jun 2004 23:07:25 -0500, helmut wrote:
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing?
Under ISX, ATM, subethaedit - http://www.codingmonkeys.de/subethaedit/
HIH
Lea
--
Lea de Groot
Elysian Systems - I Understand the Internet http://elysiansystems.com/
Web
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and
testing?
Adobe GoLive.
Rick Faaberg
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the
On a Mac: BBEdit, but I'm testing HyperEdit (still in beta) when I've
got time because it offers real-time side-by-side comparison of code
and result. Not 100% sure as yet of the rendering side, though...
Nick
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
On
<>Visicom Media's AceHTML Pro. Version 5.09.1 is the latest live
version; version 6.01.1 is a pre-release version with some added
features but isn't the final version yet. I have both, I'm happy with
both, looking forward to the final version 6 release.
Right now you can buy version 5 and
11:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] What Editors do you guys use?
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing?
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
helmut wrote:
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing?
Under Windows, i'm currently using HTML-Kit, nice editor with standards
support.
--
Cristhian Palma
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+593.9.976 1992
*
The discussion list
Title: RE:[WSG] What Editors do you guys use?
I use Notepad. I like to KISS (Keep it Simple Stupid).
/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of helmut
Sent: Sunday, 6 June 2004 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] What Editors do you guys use?
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing
On Friday, January 30, 2004, at 09:56 AM, Paul De Audney wrote:
Hi people,
I was wondering if any one has encountered a situation where you are
aware of some one ripping parts of your code etc, design and colour
schemes and using them on a site competing in a similar field.
Is there much I
Yes it's interesting but not a web standards discussion. Please reply to
this thread off list.
Peter
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*
: Friday, 30 January 2004 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] What to do?
On Friday, January 30, 2004, at 09:56 AM, Paul De Audney wrote:
Hi people,
I was wondering if any one has encountered a situation where you are
aware of some one ripping parts of your code etc, design
Try http://www.archive.org to show prior art... then send an extremely
specific email to them outlining the risks they are taking with some
links to your site on archive.org if possible.
Paul De Audney wrote:
Is there much I can do?
Or should I just deal
41 matches
Mail list logo
