Patrick said:
and once you go from XHTML 1.0 strict to
1.1 (yes, yes, changing mime type and all that) there are a few
more things to look out for ... not being allowed any character
entities apart from the basic amp; lt; gt; quot; and
apo; - so things like copy; for instance will not be
List of XHTML 1.1 entities, served as application/xhtml+xml :
http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/entities/entities-11.xhtml
I really hope I'm right, or I'm gonna have to go back to a lot of
sites to fix a lot of ldquo;s and such.
**
The
Kenny Graham wrote:
Patrick said:
and once you go from XHTML 1.0 strict to
1.1 (yes, yes, changing mime type and all that) there are a few
more things to look out for ... not being allowed any character
entities apart from the basic amp; lt; gt; quot; and
apo; - so things like copy; for
On 6 Jan 2006, at 10:50 am, Kenny Graham wrote:
List of XHTML 1.1 entities, served as application/xhtml+xml :
http://www.w3.org/People/mimasa/test/xhtml/entities/entities-11.xhtml
I really hope I'm right, or I'm gonna have to go back to a lot of
sites to fix a lot of ldquo;s and such.
If
Kenny Graham wrote:
I really hope I'm right, or I'm gonna have to go back to a lot of
sites to fix a lot of ldquo;s and such.
Philippe wrote:
If you want to support Safari (with application/xhtml+xml), I'm
afraid, you'll have to go back...
If these entities are not allowed when served as
Patrick wrote:
*browser support* for named entities can be flaky
Sorry I missed post
I'm still surprised that Safari has limited support
Thanks
Jason
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
On 6 Jan 2006, at 1:42 pm, Jason Turnbull wrote:
Kenny Graham wrote:
I really hope I'm right, or I'm gonna have to go back to a lot of
sites to fix a lot of ldquo;s and such.
Philippe wrote:
If you want to support Safari (with application/xhtml+xml), I'm
afraid, you'll have to go back...
