Re: [WSG] old underscore hack question

2008-07-19 Thread Manny Blum
If you don't want to use conditionals, then try this: #shell { background: url(../images/iebg.gif); margin:0 auto; background-repeat:repeat-y; } htmlbody #shell { background: url(../images/bgshad.png); } IE can' read the second block of code cause it gets

Re: [WSG] old underscore hack question

2008-07-19 Thread David Hucklesby
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:52:44 +0100, kevin mcmonagle wrote: hi, i want to use the underscore hack instead of conditional comments because it will be easier to keep track of image paths. Its only an ie6 because transparency workaround. In my understanding the below code should only serve the

RE: [WSG] old underscore hack question

2008-07-19 Thread Thierry Koblentz
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Hucklesby Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 4:10 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] old underscore hack question On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 23:52:44 +0100, kevin mcmonagle wrote: hi

[WSG] old underscore hack question

2008-07-18 Thread kevin mcmonagle
hi, i want to use the underscore hack instead of conditional comments because it will be easier to keep track of image paths. Its only an ie6 because transparency workaround. In my understanding the below code should only serve the gif to ie 6, not later versions? but IE net renderer is