[WSG] skip to content (was: Site Review Request)

2004-10-27 Thread john
So, what do others think? A. skip to content B. skip to main content C. skip navigation ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Development http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter Damian Sweeney wrote: Regarding skip to content links, I found this article recently about usability

RE: [WSG] skip to content (was: Site Review Request)

2004-10-27 Thread Mike Foskett
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] skip to content (was: Site Review Request) So, what do others think? A. skip to content B. skip to main content C. skip navigation ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Development http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter Damian Sweeney wrote

ADMIN Re: [WSG] skip to content (was: Site Review Request)

2004-10-27 Thread Lea de Groot
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 09:37:41 +0100, john wrote: A. skip to content B. skip to main content C. skip navigation I think we have strayed way off topic now. Can people please direct replies directly to John? Thanks, Lea -- Lea de Groot WSG Core member

RE: [WSG] skip to content (was: Site Review Request)

2004-10-27 Thread Aaron Pollock
Skip Navigation because it's conventional. Oh, and hello, this is my first post :) Aaron Pollock -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of john Sent: 27 October 2004 09:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] skip to content (was: Site Review

Re: [WSG] skip to content (was: Site Review Request)

2004-10-27 Thread Kevin Futter
PROTECTED] Subject: [WSG] skip to content (was: Site Review Request) So, what do others think? A. skip to content B. skip to main content C. skip navigation ~john _ Dr. Zeus Web Development http://www.DrZeus.net content without clutter Damian Sweeney

RE: [WSG] skip to content (was: Site Review Request)

2004-10-27 Thread Kathryn Ross
Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] skip to content (was: Site Review Request) document