]
Subject: Re: [WSG] w3c badges
Here are two nicer looking ones
http://blog.dalegroup.net/images/validx.gif (xhtml 1.1)
http://blog.dalegroup.net/images/validc.gif (css)
Michael Dale
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Rick Faaberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] w3c badges
Thank google ;)
http://images.google.com.au/images?q=validate+w3chl=enlr=start=20sa=N
Michael Dale
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Mike Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:04:11 +1000
Subject: RE
On 18 Oct 2004, at 12:50, Rick Faaberg wrote:
Hi all,
Who can I send a suggestion to at W3C that they make their web badges
a lot
more subtle (and smaller) so that I would actually use them on my
sites?
I work for the W3C and I've heard your suggestion.
While I'm not the badges guy, I know they
On 18 Oct 2004, at 13:37, Ryan Christie wrote:
You're free to make your own W3C badges to place on your site. Most
people I see, incl. myself, just use text links in the footer. W3C
won't hunt you down for infringement or anything.
There are definitely some copyright issues in using the logo
Make sure to grab my served as 'application/xhtml+xml' where available
badge ;)
http://www.splintered.co.uk/about/
Patrick
_
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
Hi all,
Who can I send a suggestion to at W3C that they make their web badges a lot
more subtle (and smaller) so that I would actually use them on my sites?
Or do I just put up text that says W3C Valid? Is that what you do?
Or just forget it entirely, 'cause who beside developers care in the
Maybe you can try making your own here: http://kalsey.com/tools/buttonmaker/ You can
make the colors match your site.
hope that helps,
Zulema
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
Z u l e m a O r t i z
W e b D e s i g n e r
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website : http://zoblue.com/
· · · · · · · · · ·
Hi Rick,
You're not tied to using the W3C images, and there are a few good
replacements around. I'm using a pretty common set of examples on the front
page of my site (http://www.klp.com.au/). They're not mine, and I've
forgotten exactly where I borrowed them from (so apologies to the original
I also agree with your last point - the general public neither knows nor
cares about this stuff. We developers only do it for self-congratulation and
brownie points from other developers and standards zealots. I'd certainly
think twice (or more) before putting them on a client's site.
What is
Faaberg
Sent: Monday, 18 October 2004 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] w3c badges
I also agree with your last point - the general public neither knows
nor cares about this stuff. We developers only do it for
self-congratulation and brownie points from other developers
I think for most clients you just don't go there - after all, it's their
site, not yours. They don't know or care about web standards, and neither do
their clients - it just doesn't mean anything to them, so is hardly useful
for evangelical purposes. Imagine if all TV commercials had a SMPTE
On 10/17/04 8:58 PM Michael Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Here are two nicer looking ones
http://blog.dalegroup.net/images/validx.gif (xhtml 1.1)
http://blog.dalegroup.net/images/validc.gif (css)
Michael Dale
Those are pretty nice! Are there more?
Thanks
Rick Faaberg
and help build
awareness. I don't think it does any harm...
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faaberg
Sent: Monday, 18 October 2004 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] w3c badges
I also agree with your
The only other one I have is this:
http://blog.dalegroup.net/images/w3c_xhtml.png (html 1.0).
Michael Dale
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Rick Faaberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:19:30 +1000
Subject: Re: [WSG] w3c badges
On 10/17/04
14 matches
Mail list logo
