Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash

2010-09-29 Thread Sam Sherlock
MS is on board but for vista windows 7 users only So ie pre ie9 is still going to be out there; I think that ie9 should be released as an xp version also the other browsers all make versions that work for xp and support html5; though though some things would only work on ie9 (pinning tasks)

Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash

2010-09-29 Thread Patrick H. Lauke
On 29/09/2010 09:59, Sam Sherlock wrote: So ie pre ie9 is still going to be out there; I think that ie9 should be released as an xp version also the other browsers all make versions that work for xp and support html5; though though some things would only work on ie9 (pinning tasks) let's not

Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash

2010-09-29 Thread cat soul
On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:59 AM, Sam Sherlock wrote: MS is on board but for vista windows 7 users only Quite true. All for-profit companies are in things for themselves. No news flash there. But if I could tease out the original purpose of my question once more, it'd be to say that Flash

Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash

2010-09-29 Thread Jason Arnold
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, cat soul cats...@thinkplan.org wrote: Flash offers a one-stop shopping tool, and as has been said, most/many people have the flash plug-in, so playback is more or less assured across the intertoobs. Except when dealing with the Mobile market where Flash isn't

RE: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash

2010-09-29 Thread Foskett, Mike
Arnold Sent: 29 September 2010 14:41 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, cat soul cats...@thinkplan.org wrote: Flash offers a one-stop shopping tool, and as has been said, most/many people have the flash plug-in, so playback is more

Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash

2010-09-29 Thread Sam Sherlock
Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Jason Arnold Sent: 29 September 2010 14:41 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 8:06 AM, cat soul cats...@thinkplan.org wrote: Flash offers

Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash

2010-09-28 Thread Sam Sherlock
Kroc Camen video for everybody http://camendesign.com/code/video_for_everybody I think Steve Jobs is thinking about everyone using Safari browser (or another modern browser that support h.264 not ff3.6 but ff4 will maybe, chrome does) but in reality for now such modern browsers are not as wide

Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash

2010-09-28 Thread cat soul
On Sep 28, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Sam Sherlock wrote: Kroc Camen video for everybody http://camendesign.com/code/video_for_everybody I think Steve Jobs is thinking about everyone using Safari browser (or another modern browser that support h.264 not ff3.6 but ff4 will maybe, chrome does) but

Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash

2010-09-28 Thread Sam Sherlock
transitions with css here http://timvandamme.com/ some icons use transition with css with in . vcard in firefox the icons just use hover active - S On 29 September 2010 01:12, cat soul cats...@thinkplan.org wrote: On Sep 28, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Sam Sherlock wrote: Kroc Camen video for

Re: [WSG] CSS and h264 vs Flash

2010-09-28 Thread cat soul
that's pretty nice.. I've also been reading that MS is on board with the HTML5+ h264 combo as an alternative to Flash, so perhaps a critical mass is forming... I do feel that flash has its place, but that it was a mistake jumping in head first as the web seemed to do over flash so many