Title: RE: [WSG] CSS vs tables - the untitled posts
Ok, Rimantas, replicate http://seowebsitepromotion.com without tables and without hacks.
- Mike Pepper
Hi,
I don't want to lower the tone, but was that comment a joke or were you serious? Your site is a standard 3 column layout, it's
From: Jamie Mason
Ok, Rimantas, replicate http://seowebsitepromotion.com without tables
and
without hacks.
- Mike Pepper
Hi,
I don't want to lower the tone, but was that comment a joke or were
you
serious? Your site is a standard 3 column layout, it's perfectly
possible to
build that in
Title: RE: [WSG] CSS vs tables - the untitled posts
No,
Jamie, not a joke.
As I
said in an earlier post, it's possible to achieve almost anything with CSS but
at what cost in time and nested divs to achieve the same result. And it's not a
'standard' 3 column layout; the right is fixed
-Original Message-From: Mike Pepper
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 May 2004
16:07To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS
vs tables - the untitled posts
No,
Jamie, not a joke.
As I
said in an earlier post, it's possible to achieve almost anything with CSS but
at what cost in time
PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jamie
MasonSent: 28 May 2004 16:21To:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS vs tables - the
untitled posts
Hi,
You could
absolutely position the right hand column, put a right margin on the centre
column of the width of the right column and have
of the main content area.
Patrick Griffiths (PTG)
http://www.htmldog.com/ptg/
http://www.htmldog.com
- Original Message -
From: Mike Pepper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] CSS vs tables - the untitled posts
widths.
Cheers,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Patrick Griffiths
Sent: 28 May 2004 17:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] CSS vs tables - the untitled posts
I like the design of the site. And it's particularly impressive from