Nothing wrong with using WYSIWYGs - so long as they are standards-compliant. I tell
you what - if you can get our WYSIWYG to create non-standards compliant markup, we'll
get you a Firefox t-shirt. Use the link below, this version will run in Firefox PR1:
http://xstandard.com/misc/beta/x-pro.exe
Quoting john [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I thought this was interesting. Jennifer Kyrnin, About.com's Web
Design/HTML Guide, wrote an article recently regarding XHTML and CSS.
In it, she mentions that she asked one of the About.com developers why
their site isn't using Web Standards. She stated that
://xstandard.com/misc/beta/x-pro.exe
Regards,
-Vlad
XStandard Development Team
http://xstandard.com
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Tate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] about.com's Web standards article
Quoting john
Back about a year ago about.com were using Movable Type for all there sites.
So they should be in complete control of their code. If they wanted to save
money on bandwidth why don't they gzip up all their pages and configure the
server to send those to user agents who handle them, which, I think,
Hi Vlad,
Will Xstandard run on Mac? If not, do you know if there is something similar to
it that will?
Thanks,
Byn
-Original Message-
From: info
Sent: Monday, 11 October 2004 11:22 AM
To: wsg
Subject: Re: [WSG] about.com's Web standards article
Hi Aaron,
wysiwyg monkeys - Eh
Hi Robyn,
Sorry, not yet.
Regards,
-Vlad
- Original Message -
From: ROBYN BALL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2004 9:38 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] about.com's Web standards article
Hi Vlad,
Will Xstandard run on Mac? If not, do you know
