Not sure about the __VIEWSTATE error other than the first character
of an ID should be alphanumeric, I thought.
also Tidy said: The character encoding specified in the HTTP header
(utf-8) is different from the value in the meta element
(iso-8859-1). I will use the value from the HTTP
ID Attribute values MUST begin with a letter and may be followed by letters
(A-Za-z), digits (0-9), hyphens (-), underscores (_), colons (:), and
periods (.).
James
On 9/28/07, Tim Offenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a page I want to validate. W3C says it's valid XHTML Transitional
Can't recall seeing an answer to this post, so I thought I'd have
a look at the issue.
Eg. http://www.business.ecu.edu.au/schools/mtl/staff/index.htm and
http://www.business.ecu.edu.au/schools/mtl/staff/spettigrew.htm
In IE I get the 3px jog and in FF dd's that are shorter than their
Thanx Bert for all your help...
Gerardo
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En nombre de gchairez
Enviado el: Jueves, 08 de Diciembre de 2005 01:21 a.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: RE: [WSG] problems!!!
Well, you fixed another problem that I had
G'day again
Thanx for your response Bert,
My problem is this: If I display the page on 800*600 it would look
correct, the thing is when I use a higher resolution as 1024*786 or
bigger... the quienes somos text would move right below the bienvenidos
section, I need that the twocols items display
G'day
On this address: http://www.addictivemedia.com.mx/limpeq/
I need to display the quienes somos and Nuestros clientes divs right below
the photo and bienvenidos section. I already clear them both, clear them right,
left, and it doesnt do it...
I've done a quick test in Firefox (with the
://www.addictivemedia.com.mx/limpeq/finalLimpeq.jpg
Thanx for al your help...
Regards,
Gerardo
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En nombre de Bert Doorn
Enviado el: Miércoles, 07 de Diciembre de 2005 04:05 p.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: Re: [WSG
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
En nombre de Bert Doorn
Enviado el: Miércoles, 07 de Diciembre de 2005 10:46 p.m.
Para: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Asunto: Re: [WSG] problems!!!
G'day again
Thanx for your response Bert,
My problem is this: If I display the page on 800*600 it would look
correct
James Gollan wrote:
The site address is
www.abbychambers.com
and the style sheet is:
www.abbychambers.com/themes/greenstripe/print.css
Also, if you are looking at the site, any general issues would be good
to know about.
FWIW: The emphasis seems to be on the designer rather than the painter
James Gollan wrote:
The site address is
www.abbychambers.com
and the style sheet is:
www.abbychambers.com/themes/greenstripe/print.css
Also, if you are looking at the site, any general issues would be good
to know about.
FWIW: The emphasis seems to be on the designer rather than the painter
You could make the page background one pixel wide, and the column background 1 pixel high... that should cut off a few kb's.
- Christian
Hi David,
thanks for the feedback. I have to agree that the text, particularly on
the home page, lacks contrast. I will look to make it a little darker.
As for the emphasis being on the designer rather than the painter, I
don't feel this was the case. The painter was very involved during the
James Gollan wrote:
Hi David,
thanks for the feedback. I have to agree that the text, particularly
on the home page, lacks contrast. I will look to make it a little
darker. As for the emphasis being on the designer rather than the
painter, I don't feel this was the case. The painter was very
James Gollan wrote:
Hi, I am having a problem getting a print stylesheet to work in
Firefox 1.04 Win. It works in opera and IE, but in Fireforx the home
page doesn't show up the images as expected. Actually, I have found
the print preview in most recent versions of Firefox to cause crashes
It may be because your img elements in the gallery section aren't
closed, and you're using strict XHTML. Try changing the imgs to
img /s and see if that fixes anything.
On 7/6/05, Bruce Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am *trying* to get my thumbnail images to align center to their
focusing so much on the other rotten
issue.
Thanks again guys
jackie
- Original Message -
From:
Ajay Jadhav
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 9:15 PM
Subject: RE: [WSG] problems with
links
Hi,
My suggestion on this would
jackie reid schrieb:
... www.mackayports.com
The problem is when viewed in firefox:...
in the left hand column div class=whiteblock I can't stop the logo images
from having an underline, its underlining the whole link.
This construct does expand the link in some line-boxes, but the entire
On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 01:39:14 -0400, jackie reid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i have been having the most appalling time with my links here
www.mackayports.com
css here www.mackayports.com/styles/newport2.css
in the left hand column div class=whiteblock I can't stop the logo
images from having
jackie reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have been having the most appalling time with my links here
www.mackayports.com css here www.mackayports.com/styles/newport2.css
in the left hand column div class=whiteblock I can't stop the logo images
from having an underline, its underlining the
Hi,
My suggestion on this would be the same as Alex James
Ajay
Alex James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jackie reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: i have been having the most appalling time with my links here www.mackayports.com css here www.mackayports.com/styles/newport2.css in the left hand column
I
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:23:40 -0500, Alan Trick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting undefined instead of DOCUMENT_NODE or 9? I used
if(aNode.tagName){ ...} to achive the required result, but it's a hack
and I want to know what's wrong with nodeType?
I suspect it's because you've returned a
On 12 Mar 2005, at 12:23 AM, Alan Trick wrote:
I was tying to use nodeType to make sure that a node was an element in
my javascript, but it wasn't working. Then when I did
alert(aNode.nodeType); I got undefined, I was really confused so I
tried alert(document.nodeType); and I got undefined
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:03:19 -, Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it just me, or is this list turning into javascriptgroup.org?
HTML and CSS aren't the only web standards. DOM and ECMAScript are too.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
I was tying to use nodeType to make sure that a node was an element in
my javascript, but it wasn't working. Then when I did
alert(aNode.nodeType); I got undefined, I was really confused so I
tried alert(document.nodeType); and I got undefined again! Is there a
reason I'm getting undefined
I don't know what the problem was, but I copied Gez's code and it
started working, O:-) . Possibly just a spelling error or a missing a '
or one = instead of two.
Thanks,
Alan
Ben Curtis wrote:
I was tying to use nodeType to make sure that a node was an element
in my javascript, but it wasn't
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 17:07:28 +, Stuart Homfray
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Have a look at:
http://www.stuarthomfray.co.uk/temp/WorkingPage.html
(CSS: http://www.stuarthomfray.co.uk/temp/WorkingCSS.css)
As to why it seems to work, I have no idea. Anyone?
HTH
Stuart
Stuart, I regret to say
David Laakso wrote:
Stuart, I regret to say Opera7.54u2 is not happy with it.
Best,
~david
Absolutely - well spotted!! ;) (grins sheepishly)
Seriously, stupid of me not to have checked before posting - the
fieldset isn't clearing the submit button.
I noticed that Tatham has an empty paragraph
Stuart, I regret to say Opera7.54u2 is not happy with it.
fieldset p {
clear: both;
}
BTW: Latest Opera 8 beta has issue with floating fieldsets fixed (well,
mostly).
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The discussion list for
A quick answer would be to create a new left-hand side image with an
extra 25px(?) of the grey gradient background on the left, and then set
the horizontal background position to -25px(?) on decent browsers, eg.
Firefox, et al.
background-position: -25px 0;
IE6
background-position: 0 0;
Maybe
Claudia Frers wrote:
I know that the code has worked on other machines so I am a bit puzzled.
[...]
lia href=# onclick=#menu2List.style.visibility='visible'Show Menu 2
Contents/a/li
lia href=# onclick=#menu2List.style.visibility='hidden'Hide Menu 2
Contents/a/li
Remove the # in the onclick
Well, Bruce, it is broken in FF 0.9.3 Win too...
http://tmp.alphanumeric.cz/Image31.png
--
Jan Brasna :: alphanumeric.cz | webcore.cz | designlab.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
**
The discussion
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:38:31 -0500, Bruce Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I was hoping someone could look at a test page I am workin on located at:
http://www.echs.dpsnc.net/testing/html/public_affairs.htm.
the CSS can be found at
http://www.echs.dpsnc.net/testing/css/DPS_top_level.css
The
Bruce Gilbert wrote:
http://www.echs.dpsnc.net/testing/html/public_affairs.htm.
the problem I am having is in IE Win, the text in the third column
(on the right) is not fitting inside the column borders. I originally
tested using firefox,...
A few things:
- A lot of margins and paddings,
Hey Joey,
On first inspection I think your problem is setting the width to 100%. The
three overflowing divs within the ctpost have settings that have the width of
the parent element and are then shifted 175px to the right, hence the overflow.
Try just using margin-left: 175px (no need for the
Hi Damian,
Thanks for that info, i have ammended my CSS file as you said, and voila!
http://www.burninthespotlight.com/topics/page1810666.html (Page with
problem)
http://www.burninthespotlight.com/styles/layout3.css (CSS File)
It fixed some of the overflowing, only problem i have now, is that
Works fine on a MAC with IE-5.2.3
Will
inline: SigThkLong200.jpg
William H. Jensen, Jr.
67 Leninski Prospect
Apartment #174, 5th Floor
Moscow, Russia, 117296
Tel: (7)(095) 137-6546
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
US address for mail forwarding to Russia is:
William H. Jensen
c/o IPS, MB 951
Suite 572
666
It's not hopping for me - have you fixed it already?
Cheers
Jason
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:23:41 +0100, Dietmar Albers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi @llz,
Please have a look at http://www.albruco.com/A4F/.
On mouse over and on click the top menu is hopping up and down. This
appaers
Since posting earlier on, I have now remedied problem #2 and improved on
problem #1. I now have the layout sorted on the blog page but IE refuses to
render all of the styling to elements within the page - certain borders and
backgrounds don't appear.
Please look at http://www.bryandavis.info/life
1. I'm having a problem with the IE peekaboo bug on my new blog page. After
the right hand sidebar becomes too tall (not sure how tall too tall is
exactly) the bottom of the left hand sidebar (which should be background
color showing through from the body) becomes obscured by the background of
for once ie is doing as its told and positioning the dropdown in the
right possy but in firefox i can't for the life of me get the darn thing
Arrrggghhh! Surely you've seen the trend when IE is right, Firefox is
wrong. Just how many times has Firefox got it wrong on this list?!
Here's the CSS
<>Jackie wrote
for once ie is doing as its told and positioning the dropdown in the
right possy but in firefox i can't for the life of me get the darn thing
Ben Bishop wrote:
Arrrggghhh! Surely you've seen the trend when "IE is right, Firefox is
wrong." Just how many times has
Kim,
What would happen if you set your navcontainer to clear: left instead
of clear: both?
-Hugh Todd
Could someone please tell me if I need some special hack for Mac IE
or if there is a solution at all?
*
The discussion list for
In my experience, IE5 Mac needs distinct clearing divs, eg:
div style=clear:both/div
rather than just the clear property on existing elements.
Of course, I'm not a Mac user, so take that advice with a grain of salt!
--
Kay Smoljak
http://developer.perthweb.com.au
What would happen if you set
Could someone please tell me if I need some special hack for Mac
IE or if there is a solution at all?
I think I know the answer to this one (as I just spend hours on the
same type of IE5/Mac dilemma).
There seems to be a bug in IE5/Mac involving inherited clearing (in
lack of a better term for
On May 23, 2004, at 8:09 pm, Kim Kruse wrote:
Thanks to you this page
http://www.pagemakers.dk/mouseriders/index.htm look the same in every
browser I've tested in except for Mac/IE 5.2.
The problem is a weird bug in IE 5 Mac, where clear is inherited on
child elements
on Browser cam as it doesn't work on PC)
Maybe the layout just don't work on Mac/IE or maybe I just don't get it.
Maybe a combination :o)
Kim
- Original Message -
From: Hugh Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Problems in Mac
Kim,
I've implemented Kay's suggestion. It involves taking out your other
clears, which are redundant:
http://www.fortyfivedegrees.com/test/
-Hugh
If I follows Kay's suggestion corretly then it doesn't work on Mac. It
works
just fine on PC.
*
On May 11, 2004, at 9:30 pm, Vaska.WSG wrote:
I'm having the wost time right now trying to get IE to handle this
test page. I have two columns and inside of each column is a table
(one of which has a width of 100%). But IE just will not allow both
tables to align side-by-side. I have the
On 11 May 2004, at 15:41, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
For one - you have a width defined container (#middle) next to a
floated box, this is sometimes (hmm) problematic in IE - the 3px jog
is messing things up.
Do you think so? I have a space in between the left and middle divs
that is left
Since it seems like a rather common problem...
My solution certainly required the box model hack. Plus instead of
left and right floats I used only left floats. All my column widths
are obviously fixed. Perhaps things were helped by the fact that only
one of the tables required a width of
Hi Mark,
First of welcome from lurker status :)
1. invalid page
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.phunky.co.uk/bs/
Just three items in the head of your document need / to be valid XHTML.
Always validate before testing or posting - like cleaning your teeth :)
Peter and I have been
:D eeeK trust me not to validate before posting!!!
Ta for that little float tip :) thats worked a treat!
Thanks very much for your help, great stuff that the first reply fix's the problem :D
Many Thanks
Mark Harwood
www.phunky.co.uk
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 23:08 , russ weakley [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
www.neester.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harwood
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004
11:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Problems
getting Mozilla to like Floats
:D eeeK trust me not to validate before
53 matches
Mail list logo
