frames, iframes and targets become modules in XHTML 1.1. So they
will still be around, but not in the core XHTML DTD.
Fascinating stuff. I had no idea about modules. I'll have to read in
detail before I can claim to understand the whole thing, but at least
it solves the mystery and shows how
Isn't that what XHTML-1.0-Frameset is for??
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#a_dtd_XHTML-1.0-Frameset
- Original Message -
From: John Horner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:28 AM
Subject: [WSG] Target Attributes
| The last thing I want to do is
Isn't that what XHTML-1.0-Frameset is for??
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#a_dtd_XHTML-1.0-Frameset
Well no, the FRAMESET document is the one which defines the frames,
i.e. it would say that left.html occupies 25% of the window and
right.html occupies the remaining 75%, but I'm talking about the
I had the same question with the same use in mind: web applications.
What you're presumably driving at is that pages look to need be either
XHTML 1.0 Transitional or Frameset in order to allow the target
attribute. The question that follows from that, albeit somewhat
academic at this stage, is
Have you seen Flex from Macromedia?
I think digital web did an article on it a couple of week back.
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flex/solutions/business/
If you check out the first example on the page about the shopping cart,
the forms are very usable.
Although I guess it could cost a bit
You are correct, you can not use a strict XHTML doctype if you want to
use the target attribute. You can use transitional XHTML.
./tdw
On 2004-10-26 3:44 PM, John Horner wrote:
Isn't that what XHTML-1.0-Frameset is for??
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#a_dtd_XHTML-1.0-Frameset
Well no, the
frames, iframes and targets become modules in XHTML 1.1. So they will
still be around, but not in the core XHTML DTD.
A brief overview of XHTML and modules can be found here:
http://www.juicystudio.com/tutorial/xhtml/index.asp
./tdw
On 2004-10-26 5:28 PM, Nick Lo wrote:
I had the same question
