Bert, Am Freitag, 22. April 2005 um 11:10:20 haben Sie geschrieben:
> Sending this off-list since it doesn't appear to be standards > related (it's not DOM ECMAscript?) IMHO it is on topic, because following the standard it should be possible to test, if a method exists. > Without seeing why you would use convoluted javascript to load a > different page, given a regular link works in any browser, it's > hard to work out what you want to do. Well, this little code snip is part of a flash detection. The user should be automatically redirected after detection. There is a noscript-part with a simple link for users with disabled javascript. We are going to drop this detection soon, but now we have to keep it, because there are several parts of a complex web application which depend on it. I need the replace method because the detection page may not be recorded in the browser history. (Otherwise we'll get some problems with google and their ad-words policies). Martin ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
