Re[2]: [WSG] pt, em and ex

2004-11-14 Thread Iain Harrison
Sunday, November 14, 2004, 6:01:52 PM, Mordechai wrote: While pt's are fine for the print media type, when using the screen (by far the most commonly used media with CSS) pixels (px) essentially replace points. When you use points, the system has a chance to compensate for the screen

Re[2]: [WSG] pt, em and ex

2004-11-14 Thread Iain Harrison
Sunday, November 14, 2004, 8:02:50 PM, Patrick wrote: In my experience IE doesn't resize ems consistently. I've come to use % for the base (on the html), then em (on the body) Eh? That makes no sense to me. Body is a child of html. -- Iain

Re[2]: [WSG] pt, em and ex

2004-11-14 Thread Iain Harrison
Sunday, November 14, 2004, 8:28:45 PM, Patrick wrote: it seems that ems and percentages are interchangeable Indeed. Unless you define a unit, I think the base unit is 1em. -- Iain ** The discussion list for

Re[2]: [WSG] pt, em and ex

2004-11-14 Thread Mary Krieger
Barring browser weirdness for a brief utopian moment, is this the way it is supposed to work.? In order for any text to appear, someone somewhere has to have chosen a font face and size. So choosing to use relative rather than absolute units for font size moves where the decision occurs. If