Tim John wrote:
Hi,
Luckily, I thought it a little strange to receive an email from WSG
informing me that I'd been removed from their mailing list. Especially as
the email was from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and contained a download -
which I ignored! I'm just wondering, as I use MailWasher Pro, I could
tee:
These are domains but the one Anders provided does have a path in Japanese
character, and it works in FF.
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/sec-iri-3
I looked at ja.wikipedia.org and they use this practise.
What doesn't always works well, is links from pages with other charsets
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 00:06:32 -0400, Bert Doorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to add to what Alan said...
remember to put spaces between images unless their is
good reason not to otherwise the following:
img src='hello.png' alt=Hello/img src='world.png' alt=World/
will look like HelloWorld
I see that it is possible, but how many folks use it? Like an individual or a small business...is it common enough (yet)?
The below links aren't working in Safari...
I've been researching how alot of open source cms's and blog tools deal with this issue and they don't. Most of them either
tee wrote:
How does Asp/PHP works if amp' replace to because the
'' is generated by the server. He said he can't find any
information on PHP official website.
This article from w3c might help in reference to PHP
http://www.w3.org/QA/2005/04/php-session
Regards
Jason
Title: absolute positioning, objects inputs
http://www.engineerrecords.com/abspos.htm
This page is a quick example, it's got form inputs and a flash file with nothing done to them, then OVER THE TOP of that, is a blue absolutely positioned div.
In IE - The select appears above the div
In
You can unsubscribe yourself at any time by going to
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/ (log in and select your
preferences).
--
~john
Just fair-weather words
from a four-letter friend.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Hi,
I'm writing a function to do all manner of clever stuff and need to
create very complex ID attributes for links. As far as I know the only
valid characters you can use in an ID (and as a class name, too) are:
A-Z, a-z, 0-9, _, -
Is that true? Are there any other valid characters that I can
Hi, Chris
As from W3C: ID and NAME tokens must begin with a letter ([A-Za-z])
and may be followed by any number of letters, digits ([0-9]), hyphens (-),
underscores (_), colons (:), and periods (.).
But I'd avoid using underscore for id/class names... I've already had
Can you repost that link for me Mike? It's not working atm...
On 6/7/05, Mike Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mlol.signify.co.nz/templates/searchtest.html
In IE6 I can't fully fully mouseover the dropdown menu items before they
disappear. It works in IE5 and Mozilla. The HTML and CSS
Title: RE: absolute positioning, objects inputs - FIXED
Sorry, cancel that! Have fixed it, you have to place an iframe directly below the absolutely positioned div on a lower z-index to fix selects showing through in IE.
http://www.engineerrecords.com/abspos2.htm
In my case (not the
On 6/7/05, XStandard Vlad Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
[Ian] 4. Author decides to send the same content as application/xhtml+xml,
because it is, after all, XHTML.
[Vlad] Author wants to learn more about XHTML.
What?
...
I think arguments like this don't help Web standards. And
Great, thanks. I'm very pleased that I can use periods and colons, that
makes it much easier. Because this system will only be reading the ID
through the DOM and not referring to it for style reasons I'm going to
stick with the underscores. However I'll remember that advice for the
future.
Many
Chris Taylor wrote:
Great, thanks. I'm very pleased that I can use periods and colons, that
makes it much easier.
Not sure this applies to your case but note that colons are fine in HTML
but forbidden in XHTML.
--
Robin Berjon
Senior Research Scientist
Expway, http://expway.com/
Thanks, obviously ideally I'd like my function to be XHTML-compliant as
well. Fortunately I've worked out a way I can do what I want to do using
just dashes, periods and alphanumeric characters.
Thanks for all the help.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Web standards should not be an exclusive club for those that do
everything right from the get go. We need to welcome everybody to the club
who makes an effort. And if they don't get it right the first time or the
second time, that is okay!
Thank you i needed to hear that.
Apparently the MIME/DOCTYPE argument of XHTML vs HTML has been going on
for a while, a bit out of my scope. I only have one argument to
contribute, which I don't believe I've seen before and may be of some
value.
On Jun 7, 2005, at 7:17 AM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
Yes. Only critical
On 6/7/05, Ben Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
XHTML is useful to me because I can swap out the DOCTYPE and serve it
as HTML, because it *is* HTML, giving it broad support today while
giving it a predictable and flexible future. This is, essentially,
XHTML-compatible HTML 4.01 Strict.
Jason
sorry about that. I managed to get it working and took it down. The
problem was I hadn't added a background colour for the ul and that was
affecting the dropdown in IE. Imagine! :)
Mike
Jason Foss said:
Can you repost that link for me Mike? It's not working atm...
On 6/7/05, Mike Brown
I am using a Simple View Flash gallery created by
http://www.airtightinteractive.com/simpleviewer/
Everything works fine except on Gecko based browsers on Mac. It's unlikely
that problem is caused by the swf file or XML data, so the only reason I
could think is CSS
Please see the screenshot here:
Yeah thanks, we know. No need to repost it or send it to us. I'm trying to
find a solution that won't screw up a lot of member's filters.
Please just delete these if they continue. A word of advice. NEVER open any
attachment from this list. We don't allow attachments (it's in the
guidelines) so
I have just blacklisted the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address and this is to
check that the list actually still works (as that is the list owner account).
Sorry, no other way to test it and this is the only solution I can think of
without changing the address it's sent from which may affect the filters
Title: Sec: u resizing problem
Hi
I've got a 3-column page:
http://home.vicnet.net.au/~persia/final/saf_test/demo.html
When reducing the width of the window below c. 930 pixels in IE 6, the content in the centre column jumps down the page about 500 pixels. In Firefox, it behaves as you
G'day
Gallagher, Robin wrote:
http://home.vicnet.net.au/~persia/final/saf_test/demo.html http://home.vicnet.net.au/~persia/final/saf_test/demo.html
When reducing the width of the window below c. 930 pixels in IE 6, the content in the centre column jumps down the page about 500 pixels. In
24 matches
Mail list logo
