Hi all,
I have Googled @media but it is hard to get to what I want because Google
doesn't seem to recognise the '@'. So, please stick with me whilst I ask
some daft questions:
1. Is there a list showing browser support for @media?
2. I want to combine my ordinary CSS with my print style
Try searching for css at'media - google'll ask if you meant css
@media and voila!
Regards,
Jon Warner
Tel: 07890 299 836
http://thepixelforge.net/
57 Arnold Road
Eastleigh
Hampshire
SO50 5AR
England
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:52 PM, designer
desig...@gwelanmor-internet.co.uk wrote:
Hi all,
1. Is there a list showing browser support for @media?
Try the ever-helpful Site Point. The chart shows generally good
support (with some caveats):
http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/at-media
The chart mentions IE and Firefox are buggy - but be aware that they
are buggy in the opposite
Hi Tom,
Sorry, I should have provided examples in my last email.
1. Below is a normal CSS rule (like the first rule in the
456bereastreet article) - which does not need a media type to be
defined:
body { background: #fff; }
2. Below is an @media rule, which DOES need a media defined
Hi people,
I see that the Australian government has required all government agency web
sites to be WCAG 2.0 compliant by 2015.
http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/Accessibility
I work for a non profit organisation that receives government funding, but I
am unaware of our legal obligation to
Nedlud wrote:
Hi people,
I see that the Australian government has required all government
agency web sites to be WCAG 2.0 compliant by 2015.
http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/Accessibility
I work for a non profit organisation that receives government funding, but
I am unaware of our
Thanks for that Kerry.
On 24 February 2010 14:17, Webb, KerryA kerrya.w...@act.gov.au wrote:
Nedlud wrote:
Hi people,
I see that the Australian government has required all government
agency web sites to be WCAG 2.0 compliant by 2015.
http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/Accessibility
Does this mean the moral obligation alone is not compelling enough for your
organisation to be convinced to follow the requirement, and they will only
do so if there is a danger of legal issues?
sp. ( in a similar situation).
.
Lucien wrote:
I work for a
That's exactly what it means ;)
Sad but true.
Resources ... blah blah ... deadlines ... blah blah ... too much work ..
blah blah ...
I suspect it's a familiar story to many.
L.
On 24 February 2010 14:59, sans principles sans.princip...@gmail.comwrote:
Does this mean the moral obligation
Please note that whilst you may not go to jail for failing to provide
accessibility aspects and compliance within a website, you may be held
responsible and found negligent and be required to pay compensation as
directed by a court of law.
Ref case : Maguire vs. SOCOG
Jason wrote:
Please note that whilst you may not go to jail for failing to provide
accessibility aspects and compliance within a website, you may be held
responsible and found negligent and be required to pay compensation as
directed by a court of law.
Ref case : Maguire vs. SOCOG
Indeed, nor if you supply an alternative source of information.
Sent from my iPhone
On 24/02/2010, at 4:28 PM, Webb, KerryA kerrya.w...@act.gov.au
wrote:
Jason wrote:
Please note that whilst you may not go to jail for failing to
provide accessibility aspects and compliance within a
12 matches
Mail list logo
