On Mar 3, 2004, at 10:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but why is everyone so enthused about safari?,
Because it's a very good, very fast browser. And it's very well
integrated with OS X. The debug menu is extremely useful: it can
pretend to be a bunch of different browsers, it has a basic
What tha - how does this work?
On 04/02/2004, at 6:17 PM, Sean A Corfield wrote:
The debug menu is extremely useful: it can pretend to be a bunch of different browsers, it has a basic load test engine built in, it can show the DOM tree...
x-tad-bigger
/x-tad-biggerPeter Gifford
Universal HeadÂ
Title: Message
OK I have now
changed all my anchor tags to the following
a
name="c44"/a
as you can see there
is nothing in between the tags, this is to overcome the issue where I have a
global style for the a element which is also applied to the a name
element.
Is this still
correct
Here's how to enable it:
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20030110063041629
However, before you get too excited it can pretend to be a bunch of
different browsers merely refers to it's ability to set the User Agent
HTTP header to say it's another browser. Useful e.g. when online
Nick Lo wrote:
Here's how to enable it:
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20030110063041629
However, before you get too excited it can pretend to be a bunch of
different browsers merely refers to it's ability to set the User
Agent HTTP header to say it's another browser. Useful
This is my first post.
I'm pleasantly surprised with the use
of
overflow:
scroll
because it seems to be the W3C's answer to frames
pages. Would I be right there?
Also I've noticed the vertical scrollbar is active,
but the horizontal scrollbar is greyed out unless it has work to
do.
Is
use overflow:auto
and as long as your content isn't too wide... no
horizontal scroll...
- Original Message -
From:
John Penlington
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 2:09
AM
Subject: [WSG] Overflow scrollbars
This is my first post.
Hello,
scrollbar-track-color: #whatever; works in IEx, and some other browsers
(Preferences... "enable scrollbar colors"), but it's an IE propriety - and it
does not validate XHTML Strict.
Having said this, I do like the
colorizing of scrollbars, as it makes for a "branding" of the site
Martin E wrote:
Hello,
Having said this, I
do like the colorizing of scrollbars, as it makes for a "branding" of
the site with the browser itself.
But I can't see your branding... let the user have their widgets.
Just my 1 1/2 cents,
Martin E.
Taco,
Blacklisted? Now there's an idea ;-)
-
You see, I knew you guys were thinking about it ;-))
-
The simple answer to your question is:
HTML 4.01: User agents should be able to find anchors created by empty
A
Taco,
Your initial post stated the issue was:
quoteto overcome the issue where I have a global style for the a
element which is also applied to the a name element./quote
At this stage, you're trying fix your fix:
HTML 4.01: User agents should be able to find anchors created by empty
A
i. Can you apply your styles to a:link instead? Thus keeping a
unstyled.
I could, but I prefer not to.
ii. Are you wrapping your named anchors around headings? You might
style the a, and override with h2 styles.
I'm not wrapping my anchors around anything anymore (on development anyway)
Title: RE: [WSG] Second try with [a name]
Taco wrote:
my suggestion was to put nbsp; between
the tag, and then set its style to not
display so it does not take up any space,
something like a name=c44 class=anchor/a
If you set display:none on the links opera and mozilla wont
Hi all,
I need to do a small test in IE5, but I don't have access to a copy of it.
And since the bit I need to test is the hover action on the menus,
BrowserCam is not going to do the trick I think.
So could someone who has IE5 please have a look at
http://www.flemingclinics.com.au and run the
Ok, if anyone is interested, I decided to go down the 'sliding doors'
(http://www.alistapart.com/articles/slidingdoors/)
path, which has given me the result I was hoping for.
The right image now slides over the top of the left instead of breaking and going onto
a new line.
Maybe not the best
hi Seona,
macintosh ie 5.2
x-tad-smaller
/x-tad-smallerx-tad-smallerscript/x-tad-smallerx-tad-smaller language=JavaScript type=text/JavaScript>
/x-tad-smallerx-tad-smaller!--
function MM_reloadPage(init) { //reloads the window if Nav4 resized
if (init==true) with (navigator) {if
On IE5 / Mac the dropdown menus don't expand at all.
On Feb 5, 2004, at 11:34 AM, Seona Bellamy wrote:
Hi all,
I need to do a small test in IE5, but I don't have access to a copy of
it.
And since the bit I need to test is the hover action on the menus,
BrowserCam is not going to do the trick I
What about Netscape?
On 05/02/2004, at 3:09 PM, Mark Stanton wrote:
Here's a screeny of IE5 on windows. My cursor is over the work removal.
There's a pretty easy way to get different versions of IE running side by
side - check some of these links:
Netscape isn't tied to the OS like IE is on Windows, so it
isn't an issue. You can load any number of other browsers, but without the
aforementioned installations, you are generally stuck with one version of IE
unless you set up a dual-boot system.
P
From: Universal Head
19 matches
Mail list logo
