[WSG] delayed rendering of containing div's background colour

2004-09-08 Thread Richard Lake
I have two floating divs #mainbar and #sidebar inside another div: #content.
When the page is rendered the content of the two floating divs is rendered
then the background colour of the #content div seems to roll-out. This
occurs in both IE 6 and Firefox 0.9 at dial-up speeds, Opera 7.52 is fine.
It's not a very professional looking effect. Is there something that I can
do differently to stop this? The relevant CSS is shown below. A sample page
can be found at: http://www.pricklypair.co.nz/register.php
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Richard

/**/
/* Content*/
/**/
#content {
  margin: 0;
  padding: 10px 20px 20px 20px;
  color: #000;
  font-weight: normal;
  background-color: #cc9;
  border-left: solid 1px #993;
  border-right: solid 1px #993;
  border-bottom: solid 1px #993;}

/**/
/* Main content   */
/**/
#mainbar {
  float: left;
  width: 66%;
  padding: 0 10px 0 0;
  background-color: transparent;
  border-right: solid 1px #660;}

/**/
/* Side content   */
/**/
#sidebar {
  float: right;
  width: 30%;
  padding: 5px 0 5px 5px;
  margin: 0 0 5px 0;
  font-size: .90em;
  background-color: transparent;}


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Tantek Celik on Ten CSS tricks you may not know

2004-09-08 Thread Nick Cowie
Recent Evolt article
Ten CSS tricks you may not know,
http://www.evolt.org/article/Ten_CSS_tricks_you_may_not_know/17/60369/index.html

You should know most of the tricks.

Tantek's peer review
http://tantek.com/log/2004/09.html#d07t1434
I found far more informative and I learnt more.

Like why IE/Win ignores !important (it does not, IE/Win just has problems processing 
of multiple declarations of the same propertry in the same style rule.)

Defintely worth the read.

Nick
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Does display:none work on img replacements?

2004-09-08 Thread Patrick Lauke
display:none has been discourages early on in the whole image
replacement discussion, as it completely hides the element
from screen readers.

Patrick

 -Original Message-
 From: Lorenzo Gabba @ Quirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 08 September 2004 14:52
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [WSG] Does display:none work on img replacements?
 
 
 | CSS |
 
 h1
 {
 background: url(widget-image.gif) no-repeat;
 }
 
 h1 span
 {
 display: none;
 }
 
 | HTML |
 
 h1spanBuy widgets/span/h1
 
 | Question |
 
 Is this an acceptable alternative to #5 on:
 http://www.evolt.org/article/Ten_CSS_tricks_you_may_not_know/1
7/60369/index.html
... or will search engines ignore the contents of the span tag?
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Does display:none work on img replacements?

2004-09-08 Thread Lorenzo Gabba @ Quirk
ah... just read http://tantek.com/log/2004/09.html#d07t1434

nevermind. =P

On Wednesday 08 September 2004 15:51, Lorenzo Gabba @ Quirk wrote:
 | Question |

 Is this an acceptable alternative to #5 on:
 http://www.evolt.org/article/Ten_CSS_tricks_you_may_not_know/17/60369/index
.html ... or will search engines ignore the contents of the span tag?
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Better Flexible Rounded Corners Option? and Site Check

2004-09-08 Thread JW
Hi

I am looking for a flexible rounded corners (with borders) that is not
restrictive to size. Googled for some but most are filled with lots of
complex solutions (lots of html meddling and tones of css codes).

Did anyone come across something good?


Right now this page - http://design.sodesires.com/tictap/ - I am working on
is using a fix width image (top bit and bottom bit image using css for side
borders). Not the best solution as my width is fixed...Just temporary markup
for me to look at the site.

In IE, if you hover over menu, the side borders will disappear. It looks ok
upon loading or refresh of page. I have no idea why this is happening.
Perhaps someone knows?



I have checked the site in Win-IE5-6, Firefox and Opera 7. Can any Mac users
kindly help me to check it in IE 5? 


CSS Markup for Rounded Corners:

#corners-mainT, #corners-mainB {float: left; width: 660px;}

#corners-mainT {background: #FF
url(../../../images/global/corners/main-T.gif) no-repeat left top;}

#corners-mainB {background: url(../../../images/global/corners/main-B.gif)
no-repeat left bottom;}

#corners-main 
{
border-right: 3px solid #DBD7BD;
border-left: 3px solid #DBD7BD;
margin: 15px 0px;
padding: 5px 0px 0px;
}


CSS Markup for Rounded Corners' Content (if it helps to give a better
overview):

#step-one, #step-two, #step-three {width: 173px; padding-top: 180px;
padding-left: 15px;}

#step-one {background: url(../../../images/home/step-1.gif) no-repeat;}

#step-two {background: url(../../../images/home/step-2.gif) no-repeat;}

#step-three {background: url(../../../images/home/step-3.gif) no-repeat;}

#steps li {font-size: 0.9em; color: #5F4A3F; float: left;margin-left: 25px;}

* html #steps li {margin-left: 22px; ma\rgin-left: 17px;} /* IE6-win has
larger padding than IE5-win */


HTML Markups:

div id=corners-mainTdiv id=corners-mainBdiv id=corners-main

ul id=steps
li id=step-onecontent here/li
li id=step-twocontent here/li
li id=step-threecontent here/li
/ul

div class=divClearnbsp;/div

/div/div/div



With Regards - Jaime


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Standards-based PHP tutorials for beginners...

2004-09-08 Thread Nick Lo
Hi Michael,
One thing I'd suggest if you're learning PHP is to from the very start  
try as much as possible to avoid having PHP generate your HTML (as in  
your example).

I started coding PHP over 4 years ago using an e-commerce system that  
generated large amounts of the HTML and I still now have to  
occasionally work on it. I can tell you that debugging HTML is a scary  
task when it is being generated all over the place. It's a frequent  
complaint that database-driven/content-managed/whatever sites produce  
horrible HTML because of their engines.

This is not really the right list for too much discussion on PHP itself  
but I'd suggest you separate out your HTML into templates which can  
be done using template engines as tricky (and some say overkill) as  
Smarty or as simple as using ?php echo $whatever; ? in your HTML. The  
important thing being to only allow php code in your HTML that is  
responsible for actually generating the HTML. e.g. not database  
queries. In fact I was recently doing a quick update on the above  
system and realised the one improvement I'd do first would be to  
separate out the HTML as much as possible. A great place to get some  
idea of the approaches is sitepoint.com PHP forums; search for php  
template or similar.

I'll not go too far into the nitty-gritties as it could drift  
off-topic. I do however think that the way a lot of systems are built  
does make building valid standards compliant sites very difficult if  
not done carefully.

Nick
... a bit much to ask?
Just wondering if anyone knew of any such tutorials. Those on php.net
seem as if they were written by C programmers wanting to learn php. Yet
those on webmonkey are so old that they still use things like:
echo FONT COLOR='red'Hi there;
Makes it very hard to help HTML newbies (who've learned standards-based
html from the start) learn PHP!
The best I could find was:
http://www.free2code.net/tutorials/programming/php/4/ 
Introduction_to_PHP.php

Any suggestions welcome!
-Michael
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


Re: [WSG] Standards-based PHP tutorials for beginners...

2004-09-08 Thread Joshua Street
Couldn't agree more.  One other suggestion, though, is to extend that
separation a little further by generating XML with PHP, and then parsing
that XML into whatever templating engine you end up using.  This just
provides another degree of separation, and reduces the temptation to
hard-code ANY HTML into your back-end... something which I wish I'd been
aware of 6 months ago!

Having your content available in XML will also simplify the presentation
of content in other formats in the future, if you choose to do so --
thinking of syndication (RSS) amongst other things.

From a standards perspective, this separation just reduces the chance of
making some early mistakes which will take ages to correct six months
down the track.

Joshua Street

base10solutions

Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060
Fax: (02) 8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469

E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded
as confidential. Please do not distribute or publish any of the contents
of this e-mail without the senders consent. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to the e-mail, and
then delete the message without making copies or using it in any way. 

Although base10solutions takes precautions to ensure that e-mail sent
from our accounts are free of viruses, we encourage recipients to
undertake their own virus scan on each e-mail before opening, as
base10solutions accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by
the contents of this e-mail.

On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 09:55, Nick Lo wrote:
 Hi Michael,
 
 One thing I'd suggest if you're learning PHP is to from the very start  
 try as much as possible to avoid having PHP generate your HTML (as in  
 your example).
 
 I started coding PHP over 4 years ago using an e-commerce system that  
 generated large amounts of the HTML and I still now have to  
 occasionally work on it. I can tell you that debugging HTML is a scary  
 task when it is being generated all over the place. It's a frequent  
 complaint that database-driven/content-managed/whatever sites produce  
 horrible HTML because of their engines.
 
 This is not really the right list for too much discussion on PHP itself  
 but I'd suggest you separate out your HTML into templates which can  
 be done using template engines as tricky (and some say overkill) as  
 Smarty or as simple as using ?php echo $whatever; ? in your HTML. The  
 important thing being to only allow php code in your HTML that is  
 responsible for actually generating the HTML. e.g. not database  
 queries. In fact I was recently doing a quick update on the above  
 system and realised the one improvement I'd do first would be to  
 separate out the HTML as much as possible. A great place to get some  
 idea of the approaches is sitepoint.com PHP forums; search for php  
 template or similar.
 
 I'll not go too far into the nitty-gritties as it could drift  
 off-topic. I do however think that the way a lot of systems are built  
 does make building valid standards compliant sites very difficult if  
 not done carefully.
 
 Nick
 
  ... a bit much to ask?
 
  Just wondering if anyone knew of any such tutorials. Those on php.net
  seem as if they were written by C programmers wanting to learn php. Yet
  those on webmonkey are so old that they still use things like:
 
  echo FONT COLOR='red'Hi there;
 
  Makes it very hard to help HTML newbies (who've learned standards-based
  html from the start) learn PHP!
 
  The best I could find was:
  http://www.free2code.net/tutorials/programming/php/4/
  Introduction_to_PHP.php
 
  Any suggestions welcome!
  -Michael
 
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
 Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
  Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
 To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Better Flexible Rounded Corners Option? and Site Check

2004-09-08 Thread Hill, Tim
There is an article on A List Apart that has something like that, not
sure if you have seen that one.
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/customcorners/ 

But I guess this has html meddling...


Tim Hill
Computer Associates
Graphic Artist
tel: +612 9937 0792
fax: +612 9937 0546
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of JW
Sent: Thursday, 9 September 2004 6:58 AM
To: Mailing List :: WSG | CSS
Subject: [WSG] Better Flexible Rounded Corners Option? and Site Check

Hi

I am looking for a flexible rounded corners (with borders) that is not
restrictive to size. Googled for some but most are filled with lots of
complex solutions (lots of html meddling and tones of css codes).

Did anyone come across something good?


Right now this page - http://design.sodesires.com/tictap/ - I am working
on is using a fix width image (top bit and bottom bit image using css
for side borders). Not the best solution as my width is fixed...Just
temporary markup for me to look at the site.

In IE, if you hover over menu, the side borders will disappear. It looks
ok upon loading or refresh of page. I have no idea why this is
happening.
Perhaps someone knows?



I have checked the site in Win-IE5-6, Firefox and Opera 7. Can any Mac
users kindly help me to check it in IE 5? 


CSS Markup for Rounded Corners:

#corners-mainT, #corners-mainB {float: left; width: 660px;}

#corners-mainT {background: #FF
url(../../../images/global/corners/main-T.gif) no-repeat left top;}

#corners-mainB {background:
url(../../../images/global/corners/main-B.gif)
no-repeat left bottom;}

#corners-main 
{
border-right: 3px solid #DBD7BD;
border-left: 3px solid #DBD7BD;
margin: 15px 0px;
padding: 5px 0px 0px;
}


CSS Markup for Rounded Corners' Content (if it helps to give a better
overview):

#step-one, #step-two, #step-three {width: 173px; padding-top: 180px;
padding-left: 15px;}

#step-one {background: url(../../../images/home/step-1.gif) no-repeat;}

#step-two {background: url(../../../images/home/step-2.gif) no-repeat;}

#step-three {background: url(../../../images/home/step-3.gif)
no-repeat;}

#steps li {font-size: 0.9em; color: #5F4A3F; float: left;margin-left:
25px;}

* html #steps li {margin-left: 22px; ma\rgin-left: 17px;} /* IE6-win has
larger padding than IE5-win */


HTML Markups:

div id=corners-mainTdiv id=corners-mainBdiv id=corners-main

ul id=steps
li id=step-onecontent here/li
li id=step-twocontent here/li
li id=step-threecontent here/li
/ul

div class=divClearnbsp;/div

/div/div/div



With Regards - Jaime


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/  Web standards,
accessibility, inspiration, knowledge To be held in Sydney, September 30
and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Brisbane Meeting, Wednesday

2004-09-08 Thread Barry Beattie

thanx to the WSG(bris) organisers and John Allsopp for a very
interesting presentation. I certainly got some ideas out of last night.

SO... while we wait for John to blog the resources of the presso, can
anyone remember some of the links he had? 

- esp the W3C semantic viewer tool?

thanx again
barry.b


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Allsopp
Sent: Monday, 6 September 2004 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WSG] Brisbane Meeting, Wednesday

Lea,

can I just say I am very much looking forward to being there.

But just one slightly off topic question for any who lives in Brisbane 
or travel there frequently (please answer offlist)

What's the best way to get from the airport to the CBD. Taxi? Bus? 
Other?

Thanks, and see you in Brisbane Weds night,

John

John Allsopp

:: westciv :: http://www.westciv.com/
software, courses, resources for a standards based web
:: style master blog ::
http://westciv.typepad.com/dog_or_higher/
  :: WebEssentials Sept 2004 Sydney Australia :: http://www.we04.com

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



[WSG] Change defaults in IE with CSS style sheet

2004-09-08 Thread Ralph
Hi everyone

I am wondering if anyone knows how to change the defaults in browsers like
IE.

I recall someone showed how a user can make their default font say Arial,
10, etc with particular colour like black on white background. Its all
configured in a CSS file. So it over rides the CSS style that a website
uses.

I'd like to do some testing of a site and trying to factor this scenario in.

Off-list responses welcomed..

Ralph
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Content Management tools for non-tech authors

2004-09-08 Thread Johan Steenkamp
AssetNow NX (www.assetnow.com) - will be available October. Uses Java editor. 
XHTML/CSS. Pricing will be under US$2k (for 10 editor seats). Disclosure: I am the 
developer.

Johan

 Original Message
 From: Joseph Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, Sep-9-2004 9:36 AM
 Subject: [WSG] Content Management tools for non-tech authors

 Does anybody have any experience with any content management tools
 that produce standards compliant code, and can be used by
 non-standards-savy authors?
 
 Does macromedia contribute produce good code? Editize? any other tools
 out there?
 **
 The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
 
 Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
  Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
 To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
 
  See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
  for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
 **
 
 
 


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Change defaults in IE with CSS style sheet

2004-09-08 Thread Felix Miata
Ralph wrote:
 
 I am wondering if anyone knows how to change the defaults in browsers like
 IE.
 
 I recall someone showed how a user can make their default font say Arial,
 10, etc with particular colour like black on white background. Its all
 configured in a CSS file. So it over rides the CSS style that a website
 uses.
 
 I'd like to do some testing of a site and trying to factor this scenario in.

Like in Gecko, in IE you can go into settings and have a user stylesheet
applied. Unlike in Gecko, to change it does not require a browser
restart.

So, as example to see what user css can do, go using the most recent
Gecko (Mozilla or Firefox daily trunk builds, about a month old or
newer) to http://newlifechurchofbr.org/
http://newlifechurchofbr.org/newlife.css (a site discussed on another
list today) and take a look using the defaults. Then, shut it down, and
in a file in your Gecko's chrome directory named userContent.css
(create as plain text if it doesn't already exist), put:

@-moz-document domain(newlifechurchofbr.org) {
body {font-size: medium !important;}
#navigation {font: small 'trebuchet ms' !important;}
}

When you restart, body will be medium instead of 80%, and #navigation
will be small trebuchet instead of 80% arial, verdana, sans-serif, *but
only* on that site.

Similarly, generic rules can be used to apply to all sites, both in IE
and Gecko. The result of generic rules is that some web sites will be
pretty much as the user intended via his generic user css overrides,
while many others, those using custom or combination selectors, will
look more or exactly as the author intended.

Now that you've done that, you should see that user css is really only
for people who understand css and have the time to apply it on the user
side, so few that it is really nothing any web designer needs to spend
more than two seconds pondering.
-- 
Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord.Psalm 33:12 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/auth/

**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



RE: [WSG] Change defaults in IE with CSS style sheet

2004-09-08 Thread Peter Firminger
Go to Tools | Internet Options and at the bottom of the General tab click
the Accessibility button and add your stylesheet there.

P

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph
 Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 11:59 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [WSG] Change defaults in IE with CSS style sheet

 Hi everyone

 I am wondering if anyone knows how to change the defaults in
 browsers like
 IE.

 I recall someone showed how a user can make their default
 font say Arial,
 10, etc with particular colour like black on white background. Its all
 configured in a CSS file. So it over rides the CSS style that
 a website
 uses.

 I'd like to do some testing of a site and trying to factor
 this scenario in.

 Off-list responses welcomed..

 Ralph


**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Brisbane Meeting, Wednesday

2004-09-08 Thread Andrew Krespanis
 I second that, it was a very interesting night... Thanks guys!

...and I third (?) that motion; most enjoyable.

I've been looking for the web related design patterns that John
mentioned, not sure if I've found it though.

http://www.e-gineer.com/articles/design-patterns-in-web-programming.phtml
http://www.appropriatesoftwarefoundation.org/cgi-bin/wiki.cgi?PatternsForDoingWebsites
http://www.welie.com/patterns/
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WebsitePatterns
..and here's a page full of related resources
http://www.pliant.org/personal/Tom_Erickson/InteractionPatterns.html

Although in the end I think I just got lost in the web of dated documents.

Andrew Krespanis

http://leftjustified.net/
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
 Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**



Re: [WSG] Content Management tools for non-tech authors

2004-09-08 Thread Justin French
I imagine new versions of Contribute are pretty good (there's a demo, 
why not try it out?).

It depends on how much they need to do -- if it's just basic formatting 
of text, I'd say Textile[1] or Markdown[2] which are ASCI-to-XHTML 
converters with simple shorthand for links, bold, italics, etc.

Textile especially is quite in depth if needed (tables, styles, and all 
sorts of stuff) but it generally just gets out of the way and let's 
text be XHTML.  Textile is available as part of Textpattern[3], a GPL'd 
CMS written in PHP so you should be able to use it in some way in your 
app, but I'd review the license for yourself.  It's also been ported to 
Perl and even Python I think.

Markdown is written in Perl, but there are ports as well.
1. http://textism.com/tools/textile/
2. http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/
3. http://textpattern.com/
All the in-browser WYSIWYG editors seem to be either cross-browser OR 
standards-compliant, but not both.  Since I have users on all sorts of 
operating systems (a lot on Mac OS 9 with IE5Mac) they're just not an 
option at all.

Justin French

On 09/09/2004, at 7:35 AM, Joseph Lindsay wrote:
Does anybody have any experience with any content management tools
that produce standards compliant code, and can be used by
non-standards-savy authors?
Does macromedia contribute produce good code? Editize? any other tools
out there?
---
Justin French
http://indent.com.au
**
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list  getting help
**