Hi,
NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT WEB GUIDELINES
I posted to the group late last year regarding formal implementation
guidelines that refer to web standards. Mostly these are created by
public sector (government) or government-related organisations.
For those interested, we've just added a developer's
I get a horizontal scrollbar (only in IE) in the .php-files which worked
fine as long as they were .htm-files.
Stefan, it can't be anything about the design, I've now put the width of the
inner frameset to 760px (was 660) and it's still the same:
Hi all
This is starting to push off topic. Please keep it on the topic of
accessibility (maybe start a new thread that is more descriptive) or
take it elsewhere... and remember our list guidelines about abuse.
Thanks
James
--
admin
**
The
This is tending to drift off-topic, but it is a valid part of standards
because we're discussing accessibility issues in relation to design and the
role of 'image' in design. (So now I feel better :-).
The attitude that says 'visually impaired people don't matter because it
isn't for them' may
On 4/21/05, designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attitude that says 'visually impaired people don't matter because it
isn't for them' may sound insular, but it isn't. It's merely a matter of
fact. The evangelists of the 'everything in the world must be accessible to
all' camp are striving
So far we've discussed sites that are basically a flash container with a
separate html site for accessabilty.
What about hybrid sites where the content is primarily xhtml and the visuals
or branding utilize a swf(with alternate content of course)?
Right now im building a site that is primarily
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:14:35 +0100, Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What about hybrid sites where the content is primarily xhtml and the
visuals or branding utilize a swf(with alternate content of course)?
IMHO that is quite OK, if you put inside object some alternative content
(images,
What about hybrid sites where the content is primarily xhtml and the visuals
or branding utilize a swf(with alternate content of course)?
That's great if it is done by a standards-wise designer, so it's done
properly (with the fallback alternatives).
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB ::
- Original Message -
From: Jan Brasna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility and showcasing heavily visual work (was
IMAGE(was Mystical belief etc))
What about hybrid sites where the content is
Interesting Jan, how would you do that - any examples?
Use the object element properly[1] and insert an alternative in there
(image, any styled code - even image map[2] etc. ...).
No examples, though. Sorry (can't remember any good).
[1] http://alistapart.com/articles/flashsatay
[2]
Hi Daniela,
My first reply didn't make any sense at all when I looked in it
further. (I just woke up when I replied)
I have had the problem myself too. Couldn't find the problem either.
I'm sure there must be a sollution somewhere.. Maybe you could try
using some css instead of tables to
Dear Sirs.
Please give me some advice on Ireland web accessibility guidelines. Is it
exist?
Some links would be fine.
Thanx.
Andrey Stefanenko
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
So, the point is, to say that 'Flash is awful because it's not accessible'
and all that stuff is to completely miss the point - it isn't for folk with
disabilities - the html option is.
Surely?
I'd say Flash is mostly a problem because it frequently breaks all
usability and accessibility
maybe this will help you:
http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum21/9798.htm
Stefan Lemmen
Holland
On 4/21/05, Stefan Lemmen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Daniela,
My first reply didn't make any sense at all when I looked in it
further. (I just woke up when I replied)
I have had the problem
hi andrey,
Dont design for broadband anyway.
Outside of Dublin, Cork and a
few other cities our only options here are SLOW
DIAL UP connections or overpriced isdn lines.
Also i would more or less make the majority of
your content visible at 800 x 600 screen resolution.
-kvnmcwebn
One example that uses the satay method and i think some of the other things
that were talking about here is.
www.disney.com.
I think there is also one in the css vault.
If you do a search for flash
there your will find it.
-kvnmcwebn
**
The
Daniela Hoffmann wrote:
I get a horizontal scrollbar (only in IE)
Jeez, I'd almost gotten over the days of framesets... *shiver* :)
Dani, have you tried changing the 'scrolling' attribute from 'auto' to
'yes' on the 'mainFrame' frame?
cheers,
Stuart
--
===
Is there a filter for Safari?
I'd like to define no-repeat for the rest of the browsers and hide it from
safari.
Thanks
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Philippe Wittenbergh
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 8:26 PM
To:
This reply shifts focus a bit, but with the word aesthetics being
considered relevant to the discussion, if not the only norm for design
of websites, I'd like to speak up for the semiotic dimension. Images
also speak like words, but more shimmeringly. I don't refer to an
animation or Flash
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:46:13 +1000, heretic wrote:
Maybe architecture is different in america, but here in australia
architects write the construction specification which has very little
to do with how anything looks. Yes, aesthetics are a really
significant part of the job; however so is
Hi All
I just finished doing a workshop in Vancouver at the Museums on the Web
conference. I showed museum web site people how they could convert their
sites to standards-based/xhtml/css with my friend Brian Rountree.
After the workshop, I posted a set of links that were compiled from our
Hi all,
I've noticed that many of you are using a container ID as a named anchor
(to create a skip nav for example), but I'm not sure if you're all aware
that this creates an accessibility issue: the user can jump to the location,
but is unable to tab past it.
Also, I've found that most of the
I've been replacing my a name=deepcontent/a with h3 id=deepcontent
Or something similar.
Isn't that the most appropriate way of going?
Are you saying this would cause accessibility issues with tabbing?
I thought name was deprecated.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Drake, Ted C. wrote:
I've been replacing my a name=deepcontent/a with h3
id=deepcontent Or something similar.
Isn't that the most appropriate way of going?
Hi Ted,
Try the 2 methods and you'll see how the latter solution disturbs tabbing
navigation.
Using the former allows UAs to jump to that
Hello!
I am writing website develoment guidelines
that will be distributed to vendors for conforming to the web standards.
I haven't been able to get more information on the implementation of pop-ups
and how it will be read by assistive technologies. Does anyone know more
about this? We are
Hi, I want to express my gratitude to all who answered my question regarding
the Web standards as a selling point. I only managed to read through all
your messages today, your answers have helped me clarified some doubts I
have.
Regards,
tee
From: Jan Brasna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
This may be helpful,
Irish National Disability Authority IT Accessibility Guidelines
Legislation and Policy
http://accessit.nda.ie/policy_and_legislation.html
with regards
Steven Faulkner
Web Accessibility Consultant
National Information Library Service (NILS)
454 Glenferrie Road
Kooyong
The site looks good, works well with Safari, Mozilla, FireFox,
Netscape, IE, and Opera. Good content layout, and best of all no
tables.
- Anthony
On 4/21/05, Pixel n Paints [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I am freelancer from INDIA... I have designed a website
http://www.mad4f1.com for
I must say this site has a very well designed layout and wonderful
structure. I esp. like the Flash implementation.
- Anthony
On 4/21/05, Kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heres a good example of a hybrid site that uses flash for presentation and
css for content as someone had requested
Very nice site presentation and I love the way that everything fits in with the theme. Nice use of standards. Very nice site.
On 4/21/05, Anthony Yeung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The site looks good, works well with Safari, Mozilla, FireFox,Netscape, IE, and Opera. Good content layout, and best of
A few comments:
- the 'driver standings' and 'team standings' are data tables and need to
be marked up as tables using the appropriate elements
-appears to contain no semantic structure elements (e.g no heading or list
markup)
-invalid html
-no alt attributes on IMG elements
with regards
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 21:36, Pixel n Paints wrote:
Hi guys,
I am freelancer from INDIA... I have designed a website
http://www.mad4f1.com for one of my client CSS JS HTML with NO
TABLE tags to make it more search engine friendly...
I tried to make it ... cross browser compatible
But
32 matches
Mail list logo
