Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets

2008-03-01 Thread Melissa Forrest
aaah no, there is nothing invalid about more than one stylesheet link tag in the markup On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Tim MacKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think its also improper markup to have more than one stylesheet link so @import might be a way to keep the code modular and still

Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets

2008-03-01 Thread dwain
On 3/1/08, Melissa Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: aaah no, there is nothing invalid about more than one stylesheet link tag in the markup do you have a link for your side? dwain -- dwain alford The artist may use any form which his expression demands; for his inner impulse must find

Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets

2008-03-01 Thread Matthew Pennell
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:47 PM, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do you have a link for your side? validator.w3.org? -- - Matthew *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets

2008-03-01 Thread dwain
On 3/1/08, Matthew Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:47 PM, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do you have a link for your side? validator.w3.org? what about the w3c specs? dwain -- dwain alford The artist may use any form which his expression demands; for his

Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets

2008-03-01 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
dwain wrote: On 3/1/08, Melissa Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: aaah no, there is nothing invalid about more than one stylesheet link tag in the markup do you have a link for your side? Validity isn't a problem, but don't add too many stylesheet links or style elements in the markup -

Re[2]: [WSG] multiple css style sheets

2008-03-01 Thread Martin Heiden
dwain, !-- Document Head ===-- !ENTITY % head.misc (script|style|meta|link|object)* !-- content model is %head.misc; combined with a single title and an optional base element in any order -- !ELEMENT head (%head.misc;, ((title,

Re: [WSG] multiple css style sheets

2008-03-01 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
dwain wrote: On 3/1/08, Matthew Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:47 PM, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do you have a link for your side? validator.w3.org? what about the w3c specs? http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/present/styles.html#h-14.3 I think this gives us

[WSG] Experience with Adobe Contribute

2008-03-01 Thread Elizabeth Spiegel
Hi all I'm working to replace a horribly non-compliant website with a standards-compliant one for a non-profit organisation. The people who currently manage the site are a bit worried about moving away from their current host (who insists on the horrible template) because they find their current

Re: [WSG] Experience with Adobe Contribute

2008-03-01 Thread Joe Ortenzi
Hi Elizabeth The concept behind Contribute is that the designers/coders create the pages and place special codes within some portions of the HTML for others to write into, but not break the hopefully compliant code created. Contribute sees the code and only allows the writer to edit the