My experience tells that Videos and anmimated things should be
made in Flash as streaming is the melody to make this the best way.
http://www.vivrecotesud.fr/
script type=text/javascript
var so = new SWFObject(swf/visit.swf, objflash, 352, 242, 6,
#3f);
/script
Ohh i didnt
Joseph Taylor wrote:
Great information and clarification everyone.
If anyone hasn't taken an underlying message away from the conversation
so far, it is to use HTML 4.01 Strict for you web documents when possible...
I wonder where you're getting that message from, to be honest...
P
--
Hi Thom,
finally someone who addressed my original question ;-)
We'd tested a few sites, build over the last 18...24 months, and I'm not
sure about how much IE-only styles there are. I guess the doctype is
mainly XHTML Transitional if at all.
I hope once IE8 is out of beta we'll have more
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Quirks mode is the best mode for the old bugger known as IE6,
IMO,
Care to clarify why, exactly?
I listed a few reasons down this page some time ago...
http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_additions_16.html
...and nothing seems to have changed
Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
Did anyone do some more testing with IE8?
Yes, and I've concluded here...
http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/wd_additions_32.html
Do we know any better release date than mid year?
The later the better, as the IE-team got plenty left to fix if they want
IE8 to end up as a
If there isn't any doctype you won't have to worry. IE8 will use the old
render engines for that.
--
From: Jens-Uwe Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:07 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] IE8 beta's a
And if JavaScript is turned off?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Persson
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 7:37 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] valid video in (x)html?
My experience tells that Videos and
Dear Michael,
Im not ure about the solution with no JavaScript
but i consider that alistapart.com or 456bereastreet has
clear some solutions.
I read about some Satay solution but im not sure that
was related to this question..
I believe flash need to be published with javascript as it is
also
I use the firefox plug in, only one i have used, just run it on the
page you want testing.
James Gordon
On 30 Apr 2008, at 11:10, Gaspar wrote:
Hello, iam looking for a software to check accessibility but in pages
were it needs to be logon.
Thanks,
Gaspar
2008/4/17 dwain [EMAIL
Hello, iam looking for a software to check accessibility but in pages
were it needs to be logon.
Thanks,
Gaspar
2008/4/17 dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
marvin,
here are some tools i use for accessibility and link checking.
http://www.tawdis.net -- there is an offline accessibility checker here
Morning all,
Not really used the API much, but im digging into it. I was thinking, would
it be worth setting up a .php library (and maybe a .js), object-orientated
obviously.
For example, someone wanting to get a list of video's from a users account
can do something like:
$yt-usr-list = new
VIDEO_ID should be USER_ID
My bad ... just woke up with my little idea :P
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:03 PM, James Jeffery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Morning all,
Not really used the API much, but im digging into it. I was thinking, would
it be worth setting up a .php library (and maybe a
Yeah i understand that, i agree totally.
One member said create a scrolling block with CSS for users that have JS
disabled. I said that wouldn't be ideal. I only want to serve up large
quanitites of images to users that have JS enabled. If i server up large
quantities when JS isn't enabled then
On Apr 30, 2008, at 7:17 AM, James Jeffery wrote:
could be the case when a user has JS enabled and not CSS
I'm having a hard time picturing the circumstances that would prompt
a user to choose this option - surely, if such a case does indeed
exist, it must rare as ... (pick your cliche).
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Hassan Schroeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One argument against the use of transitional doctypes is that they're
now more than eight years old which makes them about half as old as
the Web itself. Do you want to base your site on what was status quo
half
Hi Andrew
Dont worry im not considering those rare users :P
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Maben [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Apr 30, 2008, at 7:17 AM, James Jeffery wrote:
could be the case when a user has JS enabled and not CSS
I'm having a hard time picturing the
Patrick,
To clarify the below statement:
It's really aimed at people who are newer to this stuff and who may be
confused/ignorant about doctypes and/or just using whatever doctype
Dreamweaver defaults to or whatever, after reading through both Thierry
and Russ's example links and thinking
On Apr 30, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Joseph Taylor wrote:
stick with HTML 4.01 Strict while the work is completed on (X)HTML5
IMHO (and given the depth and breadth of the replies to my original
post I'm feeling very humble right now, as well as extremely grateful
to you all) - I do think that
Andrew,
Of course its based on taste. Personally I prefer the stricter coding
rules of XHTML, but I've found that WYSIWYG editors for the CMSs I
produce for clients are far happier in a plain ol' HTML environment.
Its probably the editor I usebut none are perfect!
My own site is XHTML
To throw water into hot oil. Choosing transitional or strict will, in
Gecko browser, determine whether your browser activates
almost-standards-mode or standards-mode respectively [1].
[1] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/doctype/
--
Ca Phun Ung
Web: http://yelotofu.com
Hi,
I've got a search box and login area that I want to use a fieldset and
legend on for accessibility but I don't want to show the legend to normal
users. Now I can easily hide it with display: none; but I understand this is
hidden from certain screenreaders as well, which well render the
Hy simon,
Legends a very nasty to style and position you should wrap the legend
text in a span (or some other inline! element) to be able to position
it.
--
cheers
Milan
***
List Guidelines:
Tried display: none;?
Regards,
Svip
2008/4/30 Simon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I've got a search box and login area that I want to use a fieldset and
legend on for accessibility but I don't want to show the legend to normal
users. Now I can easily hide it with display: none; but I understand
I can't believe I didn't try that.
Works a treat, thanks!
Simon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lord Armitage
Sent: 30 April 2008 20:46
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Best way to hide form legends?
Hy simon,
Legends a
Well then, only tell him to use the hidden part for specific media,
such as projection or whatever. Don't screenreaders obey that?
Regards,
Svip
2008/4/30 Dan Brickley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Svip wrote:
Tried display: none;?
Now I can easily hide it with display: none; but
Apparently
I've got a search box and login area that I want to use a fieldset and
legend on for accessibility but I don't want to show the legend to normal
users.
I'm sorry but what is a normal user?
Dennis
***
List Guidelines:
By that I meant someone who sees and interacts with the website in the most
common way. Seeing the page, viewing it with CSS images on, using a mouse
etc.
The user most people design their sites for.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
By that I meant someone who sees [...]
-Original Message-
I've got a search box [...]
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
--
Jens Brueckmann
.hidden {
position: absolute;
left: -999em;
width: 990em;
}
For that method you're missing the overflow rule. Try this:
.hidden {
position: absolute;
left: -5000px;
width: 4000px;
overflow: hidden;
}
cheers,
Ben
--
--- http://weblog.200ok.com.au/
--- The future has arrived; it's just
I figured that was what you meant.
At the same time, it can be a dangerous assumption. For example, by the
time an individual starts kicking at 40 years old, changes to the eyes
occur. It's called presbyopia. It's a normal course of aging that
literally affects 100 percent of people at some
Hi,
I recently come across a problem in Firefox with screen readers (Jaws
and Window Eyes) when using the HTML 4.01 MAP element to group links,
and thought it would be of interest to others on the list who may be
using it as well. It also affects Braillenote's Keyweb.
The technique is
31 matches
Mail list logo
